• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宫内节育器推荐:一项关于患者种族/民族和社会经济地位影响的随机试验。

Recommendations for intrauterine contraception: a randomized trial of the effects of patients' race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;203(4):319.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.009. Epub 2010 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.009
PMID:20598282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3012124/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Recommendations by health care providers have been found to vary by patient race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status and may contribute to health disparities. This study investigated the effect of these factors on recommendations for contraception.

STUDY DESIGN

One of 18 videos depicting patients of varying sociodemographic characteristics was shown to each of 524 health care providers. Providers indicated whether they would recommend levonorgestrel intrauterine contraception to the patient shown in the video.

RESULTS

Low socioeconomic status whites were less likely to have intrauterine contraception recommended than high socioeconomic status whites (odds ratio [OR], 0.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.69); whereas, socioeconomic status had no significant effect among Latinas and blacks. By race/ethnicity, low socioeconomic status Latinas and blacks were more likely to have intrauterine contraception recommended than low socioeconomic status whites (OR, 3.4; and 95% CI, 1.1-10.2 and OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.0-9.6, respectively), with no effect of race/ethnicity for high socioeconomic status patients.

CONCLUSION

Providers may have biases about intrauterine contraception or make assumptions about its use based on patient race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.

摘要

目的

医疗保健提供者的建议因患者的种族/族裔和社会经济地位而异,这些建议可能导致健康差距。本研究调查了这些因素对避孕建议的影响。

研究设计

向 524 名医疗保健提供者展示了 18 个视频中的一个,这些视频描绘了不同社会人口特征的患者。提供者表示他们是否会向视频中展示的患者推荐左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器。

结果

低社会经济地位的白人推荐宫内节育器的可能性低于高社会经济地位的白人(比值比 [OR],0.20;95%置信区间 [CI],0.06-0.69);然而,社会经济地位在拉丁裔和黑人中没有显著影响。按种族/族裔划分,低社会经济地位的拉丁裔和黑人推荐宫内节育器的可能性高于低社会经济地位的白人(OR,3.4;95% CI,1.1-10.2 和 OR,3.1;95% CI,1.0-9.6),而高社会经济地位患者的种族/族裔没有影响。

结论

提供者可能对宫内节育器存在偏见,或者根据患者的种族/族裔和社会经济地位对其使用做出假设。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78c/3012124/49471c0985b0/nihms206439f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78c/3012124/4a8dbf1aaaa1/nihms206439f1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78c/3012124/49471c0985b0/nihms206439f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78c/3012124/4a8dbf1aaaa1/nihms206439f1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78c/3012124/49471c0985b0/nihms206439f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Recommendations for intrauterine contraception: a randomized trial of the effects of patients' race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.宫内节育器推荐:一项关于患者种族/民族和社会经济地位影响的随机试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;203(4):319.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.009. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
2
Discussion: 'Recommendations for intrauterine contraception' by Dehlendorf et al.讨论:德莱尔登等人的“宫内避孕建议”
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;203(4):e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.042.
3
Free-of-charge long-acting reversible contraception: two-year discontinuation, its risk factors, and reasons.免费长效可逆避孕措施:两年停药情况、风险因素及原因。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;223(6):886.e1-886.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.023. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
4
Interdisciplinary perspectives on race, ethnicity, and class in recommendations for intrauterine contraception.关于宫内节育避孕建议中种族、族裔和阶级的跨学科观点。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;203(4):293-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.051.
5
Choice of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device, etonogestrel implant or depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception after aspiration abortion.人工流产后避孕选择左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器、依托孕烯植入剂或醋酸甲羟孕酮长效避孕针。
Contraception. 2015 Dec;92(6):553-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
6
The use of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices in adolescents - own experience.左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统在青少年中的应用——自身经验。
Ginekol Pol. 2020;91(6):342-345. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2020.0054. Epub 2020 May 13.
7
Unprotected intercourse in the 2 weeks prior to requesting emergency intrauterine contraception.在请求紧急宫内避孕前的2周内有未采取保护措施的性交行为。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):592.e1-592.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.028. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
8
Comparison of copper intrauterine device with levonorgestrel-bearing intrauterine system for post-abortion contraception.铜宫内节育器与含左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统用于流产后避孕的比较。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015 Sep;41(9):1426-32. doi: 10.1111/jog.12747. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
9
Cost-effectiveness of emergency contraception options over 1 year.1 年内紧急避孕方案的成本效益。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;218(5):508.e1-508.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.025. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
10
A multicentre, open-label, randomised phase III study comparing a new levonorgestrel intrauterine contraceptive system (LNG-IUS 8) with combined oral contraception in young women of reproductive age.一项多中心、开放标签、随机III期研究,比较一种新型左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统(LNG-IUS 8)与复方口服避孕药在育龄年轻女性中的效果。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016 Oct;21(5):372-9. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2016.1212987. Epub 2016 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The association of patient and clinician demographics and concordance with medicaid sterilization consent form validity.患者及临床医生人口统计学特征与一致性和医疗补助绝育同意书有效性之间的关联。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2025 Apr;117(2):148-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2025.04.003. Epub 2025 May 23.
2
Benefits of Hormonal Contraception Across the Lifespan: A Case-Based, Interactive Curriculum.激素避孕在整个生命周期中的益处:基于案例的互动课程。
MedEdPORTAL. 2025 Apr 4;21:11512. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11512. eCollection 2025.
3
Patient Perspectives on Clinician Support When Pursuing Permanent Contraception in the United States.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of race and ethnicity on receipt of family planning services in the United States.种族和族裔对美国计划生育服务获取情况的影响。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Jan-Feb;18(1):91-6. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.0976.
2
Reproductive health service preferences and perceptions of quality among low-income women: racial, ethnic and language group differences.低收入女性的生殖健康服务偏好及对质量的认知:种族、族裔和语言群体差异
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008 Dec;40(4):202-11. doi: 10.1363/4020208.
3
Physician implicit attitudes and stereotypes about race and quality of medical care.
美国患者对寻求永久避孕时临床医生支持的看法。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Mar;57(1):63-71. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70000. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
4
Inequities in the Application of Behavioral Flags for Hospitalized Pediatric Patients.住院儿科患者行为标志应用中的不平等现象。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2461079. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.61079.
5
Barriers and facilitators to telemedicine contraception among patients that speak Spanish: a qualitative study.讲西班牙语患者使用远程医疗避孕的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Dec 4;5(1):100428. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100428. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Differential associations between experiences of contraceptive care and subsequent contraceptive access and preferences among family planning patients by racial and ethnic identity: Evidence from Arizona, Iowa, and Wisconsin.不同种族和民族认同的计划生育患者中,避孕护理体验与后续避孕方法获取和偏好之间的差异关联:来自亚利桑那州、爱荷华州和威斯康星州的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 11;19(10):e0312111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312111. eCollection 2024.
7
Exploring primary care physician biases in adolescent contraceptive counseling.探索初级保健医生在青少年避孕咨询中的偏见。
Contraception. 2025 Jan;141:110706. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110706. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
8
Social Determinants of Health and Patient-Reported Difficult Discontinuation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.健康的社会决定因素与患者报告的长效可逆避孕法停药困难
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024 Dec;33(12):1635-1644. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0857. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
9
Trends in Continuation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Adolescents Receiving Medicaid.青少年接受医疗补助后长效可逆避孕措施续用趋势。
J Adolesc Health. 2024 Sep;75(3):487-495. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.04.029. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
10
Factors associated with unintended pregnancy and contraceptive practices in justice-involved adolescent girls in Australia.与澳大利亚涉案青少年少女意外怀孕和避孕措施相关的因素。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 18;19(6):e0304825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304825. eCollection 2024.
医生对种族和医疗质量的隐性态度与刻板印象。
Med Care. 2008 Jul;46(7):678-85. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181653d58.
4
Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception.将证据转化为实践的挑战:宫内节育器的提供
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;111(6):1359-69. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318173fd83.
5
Intersections of ethnicity and social class in provider advice regarding reproductive health.在生殖健康方面,医疗服务提供者的建议中种族与社会阶层的交叉情况。
Am J Public Health. 2007 Oct;97(10):1803-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.092585. Epub 2007 Aug 29.
6
Social and racial differences in selection of breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy regimens.乳腺癌辅助化疗方案选择中的社会和种族差异。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jun 20;25(18):2522-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.2749.
7
Reducing racial bias among health care providers: lessons from social-cognitive psychology.减少医疗服务提供者中的种族偏见:来自社会认知心理学的经验教训。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jun;22(6):882-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0160-1. Epub 2007 Mar 3.
8
Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic differences in the discussion of cancer screening: "between-" versus "within-" physician differences.癌症筛查讨论中的社会经济和种族/民族差异:医生“之间”与医生“内部”的差异
Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun;42(3 Pt 1):950-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00638.x.
9
Intrauterine contraception: the pendulum swings back.宫内避孕:钟摆摆回来了。
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2007 Mar;34(1):91-111, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2007.02.004.
10
Sources of variation in physician adherence with clinical guidelines: results from a factorial experiment.医生对临床指南依从性的变异来源:析因实验的结果
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Mar;22(3):289-96. doi: 10.1007/s11606-006-0075-2.