Rosemead School of Psychology, Biola University, 13800 Biola Avenue, La Mirada, CA 90639, USA.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011 Sep;6(4):468-76. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq065. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
The implicit association test (IAT) has been widely used in social cognitive research over the past decade. Controversies have arisen over what cognitive processes are being tapped into using this task. While most models use behavioral (RT) results to support their claims, little research has examined neurocognitive correlates of these behavioral measures. The present study measured event-related brain potentials (ERPs) of participants while completing a gay-straight IAT in order to further understand the processes involved in a typical group bias IAT. Results indicated significantly smaller N400 amplitudes and significantly larger LPP amplitudes for compatible trials than for incompatible trials, suggesting that both the semantic and emotional congruence of stimuli paired together in an IAT trial contribute to the typical RT differences found, while no differences were present for earlier ERP components including the N2. These findings are discussed with respect to early and late processing in group bias IATs.
在过去的十年中,内隐联想测验(IAT)在社会认知研究中得到了广泛应用。围绕着使用这项任务可以深入了解哪些认知过程,存在着争议。虽然大多数模型都使用行为(RT)结果来支持他们的主张,但很少有研究检查这些行为测量的神经认知相关性。本研究在参与者完成同性恋-异性恋 IAT 时测量了事件相关脑电位(ERP),以进一步了解典型群体偏见 IAT 所涉及的过程。结果表明,对于相容试验,N400 振幅显著减小,LPP 振幅显著增大,表明在 IAT 试验中配对的刺激的语义和情感一致性都有助于解释典型的 RT 差异,而对于包括 N2 在内的早期 ERP 成分则没有差异。这些发现与群体偏见 IAT 的早期和晚期加工有关。