Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Suite MG361, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
Eur Spine J. 2010 Jul;19(7):1094-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1329-6. Epub 2010 Feb 21.
Unidentified nerve root anomalies, conjoined nerve root (CNR) being the most common, may account for some failed spinal surgical procedures as well as intraoperative neural injury. Previous studies have failed to clinically discern CNR from herniated discs and found their surgical outcomes as being inferior. A comparative study of CNR and disc herniations was undertaken. Between 2002 and 2008, 16 consecutive patients were diagnosed intraoperatively with CNR. These patients were matched 1:2 with 32 patients diagnosed with intervertebral disc herniations. Matching was done according to age (within 5 years), gender and level of pathology. Surgery for patients with CNR or disc herniations consisted of routine microsurgical techniques with microdiscectomy, hemilaminotomy, hemilaminectomy and foraminotomy as indicated. Outcomes were measured using the Oswestry Disability Index and the Short Form-36 Questionnaire. Clinical presentation, imaging studies and surgical outcomes were compared between the groups. Conjoined nerve root's incidence in this study was 5.8% of microdiscectomies performed. The S1 nerve root was mainly involved (69%), followed by L5 (31%). Patients with CNR tended to present with nerve root claudication (44%) compared to the radiculopathy accompanying disc herniations (75%). Neurologic deficit was less prevalent among patients with CNR. Nerve root tension tests were not helpful in distinguishing between the etiologies. Radiologist's suspicion threshold for nerve root anomalies was low (0%) and no coronal reconstructions were obtained. The surgeon's clinical suspicion accurately predicted 40% of the CNRs. Surgical outcomes did not differ between the cohorts regarding the rate of postoperative improvement, but CNR patients showed a trend toward having mildly worse long-term outcomes. Suspecting CNRs preoperatively is beneficial for appropriate treatment and avoiding the risk of intraoperative neural injury. With nerve root claudication and imaging suggestive of a "disc herniation", the surgeon should be alert to the differential diagnosis of a CNR. Treatment is directed at obtaining adequate decompression by laminectomy and foraminotomy to relieve the lateral recess stenosis. Outcomes can be expected to be similar to routine disc herniations.
未识别神经根异常,联合神经根(CNR)最为常见,可能导致一些脊柱手术失败和术中神经损伤。先前的研究未能从椎间盘突出症中临床识别 CNR,并发现其手术结果较差。对 CNR 和椎间盘突出症进行了比较研究。2002 年至 2008 年间,16 例连续患者术中诊断为 CNR。这些患者与 32 例诊断为椎间盘突出症的患者以 1:2 配对。配对根据年龄(5 年内)、性别和病变水平进行。CNR 或椎间盘突出症患者的手术包括常规微创手术技术,如显微切除术、半椎板切除术、半椎板切除术和椎间孔切开术。使用 Oswestry 残疾指数和简短形式 36 问卷来衡量结果。比较了两组之间的临床表现、影像学研究和手术结果。本研究中 CNR 的发生率为行显微切除术的 5.8%。S1 神经根主要受累(69%),其次是 L5(31%)。与伴有椎间盘突出症的神经根病变(75%)相比,CNR 患者更倾向于出现神经根跛行(44%)。CNR 患者的神经缺损较少。神经根张力试验对鉴别病因无帮助。放射科医生对神经根异常的怀疑阈值较低(0%),且未获得冠状重建。外科医生的临床怀疑准确预测了 40%的 CNR。两组患者的术后改善率无差异,但 CNR 患者的长期预后略差。术前怀疑 CNR 有利于适当治疗和避免术中神经损伤的风险。对于神经根跛行和影像学提示“椎间盘突出症”的患者,外科医生应警惕 CNR 的鉴别诊断。治疗的目的是通过椎板切除术和椎间孔切开术获得足够的减压,以缓解外侧隐窝狭窄。预计结果与常规椎间盘突出症相似。