Suppr超能文献

西欧家庭政策支出对生育率的影响。

The impact of family policy expenditure on fertility in western Europe.

作者信息

Kalwij Adriaan

机构信息

Utrecht School of Economics, Utrecht University, Janskerkhof 12, 3512 BL Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Demography. 2010 May;47(2):503-19. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0104.

Abstract

This article analyzes the impact on fertility of changes in national expenditure for family allowances, maternity- and parental-leave benefits, and childcare subsidies. To do so, I estimate a model for the timing of births using individual-level data from 16 western European countries, supplemented with data on national social expenditure for different family policy programs. The latter allow approximation of the subsidies that households with children receive from such programs. The results show that increased expenditure on family policy programs that help women to combine family and employment--and thus reduce the opportunity cost of children--generates positive fertility responses.

摘要

本文分析了家庭津贴、产假和陪产假福利以及儿童保育补贴方面的国家支出变化对生育率的影响。为此,我使用来自16个西欧国家的个人层面数据,辅以不同家庭政策项目的国家社会支出数据,估计了一个生育时间模型。后者有助于估算有子女家庭从这些项目中获得的补贴。结果表明,增加在有助于女性兼顾家庭与工作的家庭政策项目上的支出——从而降低生育子女的机会成本——会对生育率产生积极影响。

相似文献

1
The impact of family policy expenditure on fertility in western Europe.
Demography. 2010 May;47(2):503-19. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0104.
2
Female labour force participation, fertility and public policy in Sweden.
Eur J Popul. 1992;8(3):199-215. doi: 10.1007/BF01797210.
5
[Family policy has no effect on birth rate].
Kinderkrankenschwester. 2012 Aug;31(8):314.
6
Economic influences on birth rates.
Natl Inst Econ Rev. 1988 Nov(126):71-81. doi: 10.1177/002795018812600108.
8
Population policies and reproductive patterns in Vietnam.
Lancet. 1996 Jun 1;347(9014):1529-32. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90676-5.
9
The choice of part-time work among Swedish one-child mothers.
Eur J Popul. 1988;4(2):117-44. doi: 10.1007/BF01796925.
10
Who benefits from social investment? The gendered effects of family and employment policies on cardiovascular disease in Europe.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Mar;73(3):206-213. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211283. Epub 2019 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Reversing fertility decline in Japan with foreign pro-natalist policies, 1990-2035: a systematic review and secondary data analysis.
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025 Jun 14;59:101596. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101596. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Universal Transfers, Tax Breaks and Fertility: Evidence from a Regional Reform in Norway.
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2023;42(3):49. doi: 10.1007/s11113-023-09793-z. Epub 2023 May 23.
6
Principal Factors Affecting Couples' Childbearing Policies: A Roadmap for Policymaking.
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2022 Sep 14;27(5):413-419. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_225_20. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
7
Social Investment Policies and Childbearing Across 20 Countries: Longitudinal and Micro-Level Analyses.
Eur J Popul. 2022 Jun 30;38(5):951-974. doi: 10.1007/s10680-022-09626-3. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Fertility Intentions for a Second Child and Their Influencing Factors in Contemporary China.
Front Psychol. 2022 May 19;13:883317. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883317. eCollection 2022.
9
Positive psychology as a strategy for promoting sustainable population policies.
Heliyon. 2020 Apr 7;6(4):e03696. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03696. eCollection 2020 Apr.
10
Are Children a Joy or a Burden? Individual- and Macro-level Characteristics and the Perception of Children.
Eur J Popul. 2019 Jul 16;36(2):387-413. doi: 10.1007/s10680-019-09535-y. eCollection 2020 Apr.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验