• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互惠声誉会激发大脑的奖励中心。

Reputation for reciprocity engages the brain reward center.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 20;107(29):13099-104. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008137107. Epub 2010 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1008137107
PMID:20615982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2919895/
Abstract

Brain reward circuitry, including ventral striatum and orbitofrontal cortex, has been independently implicated in preferences for fair and cooperative outcomes as well as learning of reputations. Using functional MRI (fMRI) and a "trust game" task involving iterative exchanges with fictive partners who acquire different reputations for reciprocity, we measured brain responses in 36 healthy adults when positive actions (entrust investment to partners) yield positive returns (reciprocity) and how these brain responses are modulated by partner reputation for repayment. Here we show that positive reciprocity robustly engages the ventral striatum and orbitofrontal cortex. Moreover, this signal of reciprocity in the ventral striatum appears selectively in response to partners who have consistently returned the investment (e.g., a reputation for reciprocity) and is absent for partners who lack a reputation for reciprocity. These findings elucidate a fundamental brain mechanism, via reward-related neural substrates, by which human cooperative relationships are initiated and sustained.

摘要

大脑奖励回路,包括腹侧纹状体和眶额皮质,已被独立地涉及到对公平和合作结果的偏好,以及声誉的学习。使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和涉及与具有不同互惠声誉的虚构伙伴进行迭代交换的“信任游戏”任务,我们测量了 36 名健康成年人在积极行动(将投资委托给伙伴)产生积极回报(互惠)时的大脑反应,以及这些大脑反应如何受到伙伴偿还声誉的调节。在这里,我们表明积极的互惠关系强烈地参与了腹侧纹状体和眶额皮质。此外,这种腹侧纹状体中的互惠信号似乎是专门针对始终回报投资的伙伴(例如,互惠的声誉)而产生的,而对于缺乏互惠声誉的伙伴则不存在。这些发现阐明了一种基本的大脑机制,通过与奖励相关的神经基质,启动和维持人类的合作关系。

相似文献

1
Reputation for reciprocity engages the brain reward center.互惠声誉会激发大脑的奖励中心。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 20;107(29):13099-104. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008137107. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
2
Aberrant reward center response to partner reputation during a social exchange game in generalized social phobia.广泛性社交恐惧症患者在社会交换游戏中对伴侣声誉的奖励中枢反应异常。
Depress Anxiety. 2013 Apr;30(4):353-61. doi: 10.1002/da.22091.
3
Neural signatures of trust in reciprocity: A coordinate-based meta-analysis.互惠中信任的神经特征:基于坐标的元分析。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Mar;38(3):1233-1248. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23451. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
4
The caudate signals bad reputation during trust decisions.尾状核在信任决策中发出不良声誉信号。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 20;8(6):e68884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068884. Print 2013.
5
Eyes are on us, but nobody cares: are eye cues relevant for strong reciprocity?大家都在关注我们,但没人在意:眼神暗示与强烈的互惠有关吗?
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 May 7;277(1686):1315-23. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1900. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
6
Oxytocin attenuates trust as a subset of more general reinforcement learning, with altered reward circuit functional connectivity in males.催产素减弱信任,是更广泛的强化学习的一个子集,男性的奖励回路功能连接发生改变。
Neuroimage. 2018 Jul 1;174:35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.035. Epub 2018 Feb 25.
7
"Better the devil you know": a preliminary study of the differential modulating effects of reputation on reward processing for boys with and without externalizing behavior problems.“知根知底的恶魔”:一项关于声誉对有和没有外化行为问题的男孩的奖励加工的差异调节作用的初步研究。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;20(11-12):581-92. doi: 10.1007/s00787-011-0225-x. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
8
Choice selection and reward anticipation: an fMRI study.选择与奖励预期:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(12):1585-97. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.05.011.
9
Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game.在信任博弈中,对道德品质的认知会调节奖励的神经系统。
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Nov;8(11):1611-8. doi: 10.1038/nn1575. Epub 2005 Oct 16.
10
Functional connectivity of specific resting-state networks predicts trust and reciprocity in the trust game.特定静息态网络的功能连接可预测信任游戏中的信任和互惠。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Feb;19(1):165-176. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-00654-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Trust-based health decision-making recruits the neural interoceptive saliency network which relates to temporal trajectories of Hemoglobin A1C in Diabetes Type 1.基于信任的健康决策会激活神经内感受显著性网络,该网络与1型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白的时间轨迹相关。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2024 Feb;18(1):171-183. doi: 10.1007/s11682-023-00816-z. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
2
Economic and social values in the brain: evidence from lesions to the human ventromedial prefrontal cortex.大脑中的经济和社会价值:来自人类腹内侧前额叶皮层损伤的证据。
Front Neurol. 2023 Oct 12;14:1198262. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1198262. eCollection 2023.
3
Does rDLPFC activity alter trust? Evidence from a tDCS study.右侧背外侧前额叶皮层的活动会改变信任吗?一项经颅直流电刺激研究的证据。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Sep 21;17:1213580. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1213580. eCollection 2023.
4
Ethnic discrimination unlearned: experience in the repeated Trust Game reduces trust bias.消除种族歧视:重复信任博弈中的经历可减少信任偏差。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 25;14:1139128. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1139128. eCollection 2023.
5
Theory of brain complexity and marital behaviors: The application of complexity science and neuroscience to explain the complexities of marital behaviors.大脑复杂性与婚姻行为理论:运用复杂性科学和神经科学解释婚姻行为的复杂性。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Mar 7;17:1050164. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1050164. eCollection 2023.
6
Norms and the Flexibility of Moral Action.规范与道德行为的灵活性
Personal Neurosci. 2018 Sep 7;1:e15. doi: 10.1017/pen.2018.13. eCollection 2018.
7
The influence of relationship closeness on default-mode network connectivity during social interactions.社交互动过程中关系亲密度对默认模式网络连通性的影响。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020 May 19;15(3):261-271. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa031.
8
Neural signatures of cooperation enforcement and violation: a coordinate-based meta-analysis.合作执行和违反的神经特征:基于坐标的荟萃分析。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 Sep 30;14(9):919-931. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsz073.
9
The neural mechanisms of social reward in early psychosis.早期精神病患者社会奖励的神经机制。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 Aug 31;14(8):861-870. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsz058.
10
Neurobehavioral Mechanisms Supporting Trust and Reciprocity.支持信任与互惠的神经行为机制。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Aug 13;13:271. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00271. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of the striatum in aversive learning and aversive prediction errors.纹状体在厌恶学习和厌恶预测误差中的作用。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Dec 12;363(1511):3787-800. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0161.
2
Neural correlates of economic game playing.经济游戏中的神经关联。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Dec 12;363(1511):3859-74. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0165.
3
The neurobiology of social decision-making.社会决策的神经生物学
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Apr;18(2):159-65. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2008.06.003. Epub 2008 Aug 7.
4
Processing of social and monetary rewards in the human striatum.人类纹状体中社会和金钱奖励的处理
Neuron. 2008 Apr 24;58(2):284-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.020.
5
The sunny side of fairness: preference for fairness activates reward circuitry (and disregarding unfairness activates self-control circuitry).公平的积极面:对公平的偏好会激活奖励回路(而无视不公平则会激活自我控制回路)。
Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;19(4):339-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02091.x.
6
Game theory and neural basis of social decision making.博弈论与社会决策的神经基础
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Apr;11(4):404-9. doi: 10.1038/nn2065. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
7
Neural correlates of trust.信任的神经关联
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):20084-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710103104. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
8
Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences.社会神经经济学:社会偏好的神经回路
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Oct;11(10):419-27. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.002. Epub 2007 Oct 2.
9
Fairness and cooperation are rewarding: evidence from social cognitive neuroscience.公平与合作有益:来自社会认知神经科学的证据。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Nov;1118:90-101. doi: 10.1196/annals.1412.001. Epub 2007 Aug 23.
10
Differential encoding of losses and gains in the human striatum.人类纹状体中损失与收益的差异编码。
J Neurosci. 2007 May 2;27(18):4826-31. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0400-07.2007.