Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zürich, Blümlisalpstrasse, Zürich, Switzerland.
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 May 7;277(1686):1315-23. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1900. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
Strong reciprocity is characterized by the willingness to altruistically reward cooperative acts and to altruistically punish norm-violating, defecting behaviours. Recent evidence suggests that subtle reputation cues, such as eyes staring at subjects during their choices, may enhance prosocial behaviour. Thus, in principle, strong reciprocity could also be affected by eye cues. We investigate the impact of eye cues on trustees' altruistic behaviour in a trust game and find zero effect. Neither the subjects who are classified as prosocial nor the subjects who are classified as selfish respond to these cues. In sharp contrast to the irrelevance of subtle reputation cues for strong reciprocity, we find a large effect of explicit, pecuniary reputation incentives on the trustees' prosociality. Trustees who can acquire a good reputation that benefits them in future interactions honour trust much more than trustees who cannot build a good reputation. These results cast doubt on hypotheses suggesting that strong reciprocity is easily malleable by implicit reputation cues not backed by explicit reputation incentives.
强互惠性的特点是愿意利他地奖励合作行为,以及利他地惩罚违反规范、背叛行为。最近的证据表明,微妙的声誉线索,如在参与者做出选择时眼睛盯着他们,可能会增强亲社会行为。因此,原则上,强互惠性也可能受到目光线索的影响。我们在信任游戏中研究了目光线索对委托人利他行为的影响,结果发现没有影响。无论是被归类为亲社会的参与者,还是被归类为自私的参与者,都不会对这些线索做出反应。与微妙声誉线索对强互惠性的不相关形成鲜明对比的是,我们发现明确的、金钱声誉激励对委托人的亲社会性有很大影响。那些能够获得未来互动中对自己有益的良好声誉的委托人,比那些无法建立良好声誉的委托人更遵守信任。这些结果让人怀疑那些认为强互惠性很容易受到没有明确声誉激励支持的隐含声誉线索影响的假说。