Suppr超能文献

大流行性流感疫苗效力-初级保健报告(VIPER):评估大流行性流感 A(H1N1)v 疫苗效力的观察性研究。

Vaccine effectiveness in pandemic influenza - primary care reporting (VIPER): an observational study to assess the effectiveness of the pandemic influenza A (H1N1)v vaccine.

机构信息

Allergy & Respiratory Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jul;14(34):313-46. doi: 10.3310/hta14340-05.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine influenza A (H1N1)v vaccine effectiveness (VE) in the Scottish population at an early stage of the 2009-10 H1N1v vaccination programme, using a sentinel surveillance network of 41 general practices contributing to the Practice Team Information (PTI) network.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study using record linkage. Using the Community Health Index (CHI) number, general practice patient-level data were extracted and linked to the Scottish Morbidity Record (SMR) catalogue, containing information on all inpatient hospitalisations in Scotland. The Health Protection Scotland (HPS) data set was also used, consisting of laboratory-confirmed cases of influenza A (H1N1)v from the practices. The study involved a longitudinal evaluation of the aspect of the influenza A (H1N1)v vaccination programme implemented through general practice in autumn/winter 2009.

RESULTS

At 25 December 2009, vaccine uptake estimates for the study population were 12.0% (95% CI 11.9 to 12.1). For those patients in an at-risk group (n = 59,721), the uptake rate was 37.5% (95% CI 37.1 to 37.9). Among the 1492 patients swabbed, 467 were positive for H1N1, giving a positivity rate of 31.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 29.0 to 33.7]. Among those in a clinical risk group who were not vaccinated, 41.3% (95% CI 35.6 to 46.9) tested positive for influenza A (H1N1)v, a significant difference from the H1N1 positivity percentage among patients with no clinical risk (p < 0.01). Among those vaccinated and in a clinical risk group, only one patient (5%, 95% CI 0.3 to 23.6) tested after vaccination was positive for influenza A (H1N1)v. By comparing postvaccination swabs in those who were vaccinated with swabs taken in those who remained unvaccinated, the VE was found to be 95.0% (95% CI 76.0 to 100.0). In the study population there were 2739 admissions to hospital, of which 1241 were emergency admissions; all 48 emergency hospitalisations for influenza and pneumonia occurred in patients who did not receive the vaccine. VE for single or combined end points of influenza and pneumonia hospitalisation for all patients was estimated at 100.0% (95% CI infinity to 100.0). There were 132 hospitalisations in the unvaccinated group versus five in the vaccinated group for cardiovascular-related conditions. There were 193 hospitalisations in the unvaccinated group versus nine in those vaccinated in the group of patients admitted for influenza, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular-related conditions. VE for cardiovascular-related conditions alone, or in individuals with influenza, pneumonia COPD and cardiovascular-related conditions, was 71.1% (95% CI 11.3 to 90.6) and 64.7% (95% CI 12.0 to 85.8) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from swabs submitted from patients in the cohort who presented in general practice with influenza-like illness suggests that the introduction of influenza A (H1N1)v vaccine in Scotland during 2009 was associated with a high degree of protection. Influenza A (H1N1)v immunisation in primary health-care settings appears to be both effective and widely acceptable, and should continue to be the mainstay of disease prevention for at-risk patients. A further analysis encompassing the whole influenza season is required to cover more days of vaccination exposure and increase precision.

摘要

目的

利用参与 Practice Team Information (PTI) 网络的 41 家普通科诊所组成的监测网络,在 2009-10 年 H1N1v 流感疫苗接种计划的早期阶段,确定甲型流感(H1N1)v 疫苗的有效性(VE)。

方法

回顾性队列研究,采用记录链接。使用社区健康指数(CHI)号码,提取普通科诊所患者级别的数据,并链接到苏格兰住院记录目录,其中包含苏格兰所有住院患者的信息。还使用了苏格兰卫生保护局(HPS)数据集,其中包含来自诊所的实验室确诊的甲型流感(H1N1)v 病例。该研究涉及对 2009 年秋季/冬季通过普通科实施的甲型流感(H1N1)v 疫苗接种计划的一个方面进行纵向评估。

结果

截至 2009 年 12 月 25 日,研究人群的疫苗接种率估计为 12.0%(95%CI 11.9 至 12.1)。对于处于高危组的患者(n=59721),接种率为 37.5%(95%CI 37.1 至 37.9)。在 1492 名接受拭子检测的患者中,467 人甲型流感 H1N1 检测呈阳性,阳性率为 31.3%(95%CI 29.0 至 33.7)。在未接种疫苗的有临床风险的患者中,有 41.3%(95%CI 35.6 至 46.9)的患者甲型流感 H1N1 检测呈阳性,与无临床风险的患者的 H1N1 阳性百分比有显著差异(p<0.01)。在接种疫苗且处于临床风险组的患者中,只有 1 名患者(5%,95%CI 0.3 至 23.6)在接种疫苗后检测呈甲型流感 H1N1 阳性。通过比较接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的患者接种后拭子,VE 为 95.0%(95%CI 76.0 至 100.0)。在研究人群中,有 2739 人住院,其中 1241 人是急症入院;所有 48 例因流感和肺炎住院的患者均未接种疫苗。所有患者流感和肺炎住院的单一或联合终点的 VE 估计为 100.0%(95%CI 无限至 100.0)。未接种组有 132 人住院,接种组有 5 人住院,与心血管相关的疾病。未接种组有 193 人住院,接种组有 9 人住院,原因是流感、肺炎、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和心血管相关疾病。单独或合并流感、肺炎、COPD 和心血管相关疾病的心血管相关疾病的 VE 分别为 71.1%(95%CI 11.3 至 90.6)和 64.7%(95%CI 12.0 至 85.8)。

结论

从普通科诊所出现流感样症状的患者提交的拭子样本中获得的证据表明,2009 年苏格兰引入甲型流感(H1N1)v 疫苗与高度保护相关。初级保健环境中的甲型流感(H1N1)v 免疫接种似乎既有效又广泛可接受,应继续作为高危患者疾病预防的主要手段。需要进一步分析整个流感季节,以涵盖更多的疫苗接种暴露天数,并提高精确度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验