Dept. of Zoology and Physiology, Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Sep;104(3):1456-71. doi: 10.1152/jn.00598.2009. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
The inferior colliculus (IC) of the pallid bat has a large percentage of neurons that respond selectively to the rate and direction of the bat's echolocation pulse, a downward FM sweep. Three underlying mechanisms have been previously described. Here we describe a fourth mechanism, facilitation, that shapes selectivity for both sweep rate and direction. The neurons studied are termed FM specialists, because they do not respond to tones. Most were selective for the downward sweep direction, and this preference was expressed even when presented with narrowband, 1 kHz sweeps that crossed only a fraction of their excitatory receptive fields. This selectivity was also expressed in response to two tones delayed in time, termed two-tone facilitation (TTF). Direction-selective neurons showed a greatly facilitated response when a higher-frequency tone preceded a lower-frequency tone, simulating conditions in a downward sweep. The degree of temporal asymmetry in facilitation accurately predicted direction selectivity. When the spectral difference between the two tones was increased, the best delay also increased and could be used to predict a neuron's preferred sweep rate. To determine whether TTF alone created rate and direction selectivity, low- and high-frequency inhibitory sidebands, which can also shape selectivity, were eliminated from sweeps. In most cases, selectivity persisted. These results support the idea of spectral delay lines that produce an overlap and summation of excitatory inputs only when a dynamic stimulus traverses a receptive field in one direction at a specific velocity.
下丘(IC)的苍白蝙蝠有一个大比例的神经元,选择性地响应蝙蝠回声定位脉冲的速率和方向,一个向下调频扫频。以前已经描述了三个潜在的机制。在这里,我们描述了第四个机制,促进,它为扫频速率和方向的选择性塑造。所研究的神经元被称为调频专家,因为它们不响应音调。大多数神经元对向下扫频方向具有选择性,即使在仅跨越其兴奋性感受野的一小部分的窄带 1 kHz 扫频时,也会表现出这种偏好。这种选择性也表现在对两个时间延迟的音调的响应中,称为双音促进(TTF)。当一个高频音调在一个低频音调之前时,方向选择性神经元的反应会得到极大的促进,模拟了向下扫频中的条件。促进的时间不对称程度准确地预测了方向选择性。当两个音调之间的光谱差异增加时,最佳延迟也会增加,并且可以用来预测神经元的最佳扫频速率。为了确定 TTF 是否单独产生了速率和方向选择性,从扫频中消除了可以塑造选择性的低频和高频抑制边带。在大多数情况下,选择性仍然存在。这些结果支持了产生兴奋性输入的重叠和总和的光谱延迟线的概念,只有当动态刺激以特定速度在一个方向上穿过感受野时才会发生这种重叠和总和。