Rosso Raphael, Medi Caroline, Teh Andrew W, Hung Thuy To, Feldman Alexander, Lee Geoffrey, Mond Harry G
Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria 3050, Melbourne, Australia.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010 Oct;33(10):1169-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02836.x.
Prolonged right ventricle (RV) apical pacing is associated with left ventricle (LV) dysfunction due to dysynchronous ventricular activation and contraction. Alternative RV pacing sites with a narrower QRS compared to RV pacing might reflect a more physiological and synchronous LV activation. The purpose of this study was to compare the QRS morphology, duration, and suitability of RV outflow tract (RVOT) septal and mid-RV septal pacing.
Seventeen consecutive patients with indication for dual-chamber pacing were enrolled in the study. Two standard 58-cm active fixation leads were passed to the RV and positioned in the RVOT septum and mid-RV septum using a commercially available septal stylet (model 4140, St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA). QRS duration, morphology, and pacing parameters were compared at the two sites. The RV lead with less-satisfactory electrical parameters was withdrawn and deployed in the right atrium.
Successful positioning of the pacing leads at the RVOT septum and mid-RV septum was achieved in 15 patients (88.2%). There were no significant differences in the mean stimulation threshold, R-wave sensing, and lead impedance between the two sites. The QRS duration in the RVOT septum was 151 ± 14 ms and in the mid-RV septum 145 ± 13 ms (P = 0.150).
This prospective observational study shows that septal pacing can be reliably achieved both in the RVOT and mid-RV with active fixation leads using a specifically shaped stylet. There are no preferences in regard to acute lead performance or paced QRS duration with either position.
由于心室激活和收缩不同步,右心室(RV)心尖部长期起搏与左心室(LV)功能障碍有关。与RV起搏相比,QRS波较窄的替代性RV起搏部位可能反映了更生理性和同步性的LV激活。本研究的目的是比较右心室流出道(RVOT)间隔和RV间隔中部起搏的QRS形态、持续时间和适用性。
17例有双腔起搏指征的连续患者纳入本研究。将两根标准的58厘米主动固定导线送入RV,并使用市售的间隔探针(型号4140,美国明尼苏达州圣保罗市圣犹达医疗公司)将其置于RVOT间隔和RV间隔中部。比较两个部位的QRS持续时间、形态和起搏参数。将电参数不太满意的RV导线撤回并置于右心房。
15例患者(88.2%)成功将起搏导线置于RVOT间隔和RV间隔中部。两个部位之间的平均刺激阈值、R波感知和导线阻抗无显著差异。RVOT间隔的QRS持续时间为151±14毫秒,RV间隔中部为145±13毫秒(P = 0.150)。
这项前瞻性观察研究表明,使用特殊形状的探针,主动固定导线可在RVOT和RV中部可靠地实现间隔起搏。两种位置在急性导线性能或起搏QRS持续时间方面均无偏好。