• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同种植体-基台连接系统的预负荷损失和细菌侵入情况。

Preload loss and bacterial penetration on different implant-abutment connection systems.

作者信息

Ricomini Filho Antônio Pedro, Fernandes Frederico Silva de Freitas, Straioto Fabiana Gouveia, da Silva Wander José, Del Bel Cury Altair Antoninha

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz Dent J. 2010;21(2):123-9. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402010000200006.

DOI:10.1590/s0103-64402010000200006
PMID:20640358
Abstract

Preload loss can favor the occurrence of implant-abutment interface misfit, and bacterial colonization at this interface may lead to implant failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the preload loss and bacterial penetration through the implant-abutment interface of conical and external hexagon connection systems subjected to thermal cycling and mechanical fatigue (TM). Four different implant-abutment connection systems were evaluated (n=6): external hexagon with universal post, Morse taper with universal post, Morse taper with universal post through bolt, and locking taper with standard abutment. The assemblies (implant-abutment) were subjected to a thermal cycling regimen (1,000 cycles of 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C) and to mechanical fatigue (1.0 million cycles, 1.0 Hz, 120 N). The assemblies were immersed in Tryptic Soy + Yeast Extract broth containing Streptococcus sanguinis and incubated at 37 degrees C and 10% CO(2) for 72 h. Detorque values were recorded. The bacterial penetration was assessed and the abutments were observed by scanning electron microscopy. The preload data were analyzed statistically by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance level. All screw abutment systems showed significantly higher (p<0.05) detorque values when subjected to TM and all conical systems presented bacterial penetration. The results show no relationship between the preload loss and the bacterial penetration.

摘要

预载损失可能会促进种植体-基台界面不匹配的发生,并且该界面处的细菌定植可能导致种植失败。本研究的目的是评估经过热循环和机械疲劳(TM)处理的锥形和外六角连接系统的种植体-基台界面的预载损失和细菌渗透情况。评估了四种不同的种植体-基台连接系统(n = 6):带通用桩的外六角、带通用桩的莫氏锥度、带贯穿螺栓通用桩的莫氏锥度以及带标准基台的锁定锥度。组件(种植体-基台)接受热循环方案(5℃和55℃的1000个循环)和机械疲劳(100万个循环,1.0Hz,120N)。将组件浸入含有血链球菌的胰蛋白胨大豆 + 酵母提取物肉汤中,并在37℃和10%二氧化碳条件下孵育72小时。记录拧松扭矩值。评估细菌渗透情况,并通过扫描电子显微镜观察基台。预载数据通过双向方差分析和Tukey检验进行统计学分析,显著性水平为5%。所有螺丝基台系统在经受TM时均显示出显著更高(p < 0.05)的拧松扭矩值,并且所有锥形系统均出现细菌渗透。结果表明预载损失与细菌渗透之间没有关系。

相似文献

1
Preload loss and bacterial penetration on different implant-abutment connection systems.不同种植体-基台连接系统的预负荷损失和细菌侵入情况。
Braz Dent J. 2010;21(2):123-9. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402010000200006.
2
Removal Torque and Biofilm Accumulation at Two Dental Implant-Abutment Joints After Fatigue.疲劳后两种牙种植体-基台连接处的拆除扭矩和生物膜堆积情况
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):813-9. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4173.
3
Microbial leakage through the implant-abutment interface of Morse taper implants in vitro.体外研究莫氏锥度种植体-基台界面处微生物渗漏
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Mar;21(3):328-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01837.x. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
4
Wear of Morse taper and external hexagon implant joints after abutment removal.基台拆除后莫氏锥度和外六角种植体连接部位的磨损。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2017 May;28(5):65. doi: 10.1007/s10856-017-5879-6. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
5
The role of implant/abutment system on torque maintenance of retention screws and vertical misfit of implant-supported crowns before and after mechanical cycling.种植体/基台系统对机械循环前后固位螺钉扭矩维持和种植体支持的冠垂直不匹配的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):415-22. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2727.
6
An in vitro investigation concerning the bacterial leakage at implants with internal hexagon and Morse taper implant-abutment connections.一种关于内六角和莫尔斯锥度种植体-基台连接的种植体细菌渗漏的体外研究。
Implant Dent. 2012 Aug;21(4):335-9. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31825cd472.
7
The Impact of Conical and Nonconical Abutments on Bacterial Infiltration at the Implant-Abutment Interface.锥形和非锥形基台对种植体-基台界面细菌侵入的影响。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016 Nov/Dec;36(6):825-831. doi: 10.11607/prd.2779.
8
Performance of different abutment/implant joints as a result of a sealing agent.不同基台/种植体连接界面在密封剂作用下的性能表现。
J Prosthodont Res. 2021 Oct 15;65(4):489-494. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00025. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
9
Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.锥形种植体-基台连接的负载疲劳性能。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):797-806.
10
Evaluation of torque maintenance of abutment and cylinder screws with Morse taper implants.采用莫氏锥度种植体评估基台和柱螺钉的扭矩保持情况。
J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Nov;23(6):e631-4. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318270fe0e.

引用本文的文献

1
Biconometric Connections in Dental Implants: A Pilot Mechanical Study.牙种植体中的双锥测量连接:一项初步力学研究。
Materials (Basel). 2025 Mar 23;18(7):1415. doi: 10.3390/ma18071415.
2
Effect of polishing process on torque loss ratio and microgap of selective laser melting abutment: an in vitro study.抛光工艺对选择性激光熔化基台扭矩损失率和微间隙的影响:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 9;24(1):1055. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04829-y.
3
Experimental study on implant-abutment locking force and abutment subsidence in a pure Morse taper connection implant system.
纯莫氏锥度连接种植体系统中种植体-基台锁合力与基台下沉的实验研究。
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Jun 1;42(3):372-381. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2024.2023387.
4
Microleakage along the implant-abutment interface: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.种植体-基台界面微渗漏:体外研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Sep 21;9(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00494-y.
5
Micro-CT Evaluation of Microgaps at Implant-Abutment Connection.种植体-基台连接处微间隙的显微CT评估
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jun 20;16(12):4491. doi: 10.3390/ma16124491.
6
Biomechanical efficiency of different implant-abutment connection: a systematic review of studies using photoelastic stress analysis.不同种植体-基台连接的生物力学效率:使用光弹应力分析的研究系统评价。
Evid Based Dent. 2023 Jun;24(2):92. doi: 10.1038/s41432-023-00884-6. Epub 2023 May 15.
7
Marginal Bone Level and Clinical Parameter Analysis Comparing External Hexagon and Morse Taper Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.比较外六边形和莫氏锥度种植体的边缘骨水平及临床参数分析:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 28;13(9):1587. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091587.
8
Different Conical Angle Connection of Implant and Abutment Behavior: A Static and Dynamic Load Test and Finite Element Analysis Study.种植体与基台不同锥角连接的行为:静态和动态载荷测试及有限元分析研究
Materials (Basel). 2023 Feb 28;16(5):1988. doi: 10.3390/ma16051988.
9
Evaluation of Removal Force in Prosthetic Components of Morse Taper Dental Implants.评价 Morse 锥度牙科种植体修复体的去除力。
Braz Dent J. 2022 Sep-Oct;33(5):74-80. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202205084.
10
In Vitro Study of Preload Loss in Different Implant Abutment Connection Designs.不同种植体基台连接设计中预负荷损失的体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Feb 14;15(4):1392. doi: 10.3390/ma15041392.