Grasso P, Sharratt M, Cohen A J
Robens Institute of Health and Safety, University of Surrey, Guildford, England.
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1991;31:253-87. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.31.040191.001345.
This review has focused on the importance of cellular proliferation in neoplasia induced by nongenotoxic carcinogens and has not attempted to address the mechanisms involved in the progression from the hyperplastic to the neoplastic state. Major advances in this area are likely in the next decade and should explain how cells in an abnormally high proliferative state are rendered more vulnerable either to the action of endogenous or environmental mutagens or to defects in cell reproduction, thus providing the stimulus for progression to neoplasia (165). In this review evidence has been presented to support the hypothesis that sustained tissue damage induced by nongenotoxic compounds in rodents predisposes to tumor development. The evidence has been obtained by drawing from the published findings of experimental rodent studies conducted over the past 50 years. The experience gained at various sites in the rodent including the connective tissue, liver, bladder, and forestomach shows the existence of a threshold dose for various test materials/agents, below which neither sustained tissue damage nor tumor induction occurs but above which level both effects are manifest. Taken collectively, an overall picture emerges that sustained cell proliferation renders various sites in the rodent vulnerable to tumor development. The validity of this hypothesis is of importance to the evaluation of carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans. For those nongenotoxic carcinogens known to cause characteristically defined and sustainable tissue damage as a precursor of tumor development in rodents, it should be possible to establish a threshold dose below which both effects disappear and upon which a safety margin in humans can be based. Some limited evidence supports an association between chronic tissue injury and neoplastic development in humans. Note, however, that certain types of induced tissue damage may be rodent-specific and therefore have no relevance for humans. We conclude that the appearance of persistent tissue damage predisposes to tumor development in rodents exposed to nongenotoxic carcinogens and that systematic studies in rodents should provide a rational basis for arriving at a safety margin in humans exposed to such agents.
本综述聚焦于细胞增殖在非遗传毒性致癌物诱发肿瘤形成过程中的重要性,并未尝试探讨从增生状态发展为肿瘤状态所涉及的机制。未来十年该领域可能会取得重大进展,有望解释处于异常高增殖状态的细胞如何变得更容易受到内源性或环境诱变剂的作用,或者细胞繁殖缺陷的影响,从而为肿瘤发展提供刺激因素(165)。在本综述中,已列举证据支持以下假说:非遗传毒性化合物在啮齿动物中诱导的持续性组织损伤易引发肿瘤。这些证据来自过去50年已发表的啮齿动物实验研究结果。在啮齿动物的各个部位,包括结缔组织、肝脏、膀胱和前胃所获得的经验表明,各种受试材料/试剂都存在一个阈剂量,低于该剂量既不会发生持续性组织损伤,也不会诱发肿瘤,但高于该剂量水平,两种效应都会显现。总体而言,呈现出一幅整体图景,即持续性细胞增殖使啮齿动物的各个部位易患肿瘤。该假说的正确性对于评估化学物质对人类的致癌风险至关重要。对于那些已知会在啮齿动物中引起典型的、可持续的组织损伤作为肿瘤发展前兆的非遗传毒性致癌物,应该能够确定一个阈剂量,低于该剂量两种效应都会消失,据此可以确定人类的安全边际。一些有限的证据支持人类慢性组织损伤与肿瘤发展之间存在关联。然而,需要注意的是,某些类型的诱导性组织损伤可能是啮齿动物特有的,因此与人类无关。我们得出结论,持续性组织损伤的出现易使接触非遗传毒性致癌物的啮齿动物患肿瘤,对啮齿动物进行的系统性研究应为确定接触此类物质的人类的安全边际提供合理依据。