McCann J
Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA 94303 USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Nov;106(11):701-17. doi: 10.1289/ehp.106-1533493.
This review provides a discussion of cancer risk assessment methodology pertinent to developing a strategy for extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields (EMF). Approaches taken for chemical agents or ionizing radiation in six key topic areas are briefly reviewed, and then those areas are examined from the perspective of EMF, identifying issues to be addressed in developing a risk assessment strategy. The following recommendations are offered: 1) risk assessment should be viewed as an iterative process that informs an overall judgment as to health risk and consists of a complex of related activities incorporating both positive and negative data, tumor and nontumor end points, and human and nonhuman sources of information; 2) a hazard identification resulting in a conclusion of weak or null effects, such as may be associated with EMF, will need to assign significant weight to animal cancer bioassays conducted under defined exposure conditions as well as to human epidemiologic studies; 3) a default factor to account for possible age differences in sensitivity to carcinogenesis should be included in an EMF risk assessment; 4) lack of evidence of dose response and the apparent lack of DNA reactivity of EMF suggest that a safety (or uncertainty) factor or margin of exposure type of risk characterization may be most appropriate; and 5) an EMF risk assessment should permit at least tentative conclusions to be reached as to the limits of carcinogenic risk from exposure to EMF, and should also define an efficient research agenda aimed at clarifying uncertainties appropriate to a more complete assessment.
本综述讨论了与制定极低频电场和磁场(EMF)策略相关的癌症风险评估方法。简要回顾了在六个关键主题领域中针对化学物质或电离辐射所采用的方法,然后从EMF的角度审视这些领域,确定在制定风险评估策略时需要解决的问题。并提出以下建议:1)风险评估应被视为一个迭代过程,为关于健康风险的总体判断提供信息,它由一系列相关活动组成,包括正面和负面数据、肿瘤和非肿瘤终点以及人类和非人类信息来源;2)得出弱效应或无效应结论的危害识别(如可能与EMF相关),需要高度重视在规定暴露条件下进行的动物癌症生物测定以及人类流行病学研究;3)EMF风险评估应纳入一个默认因子,以考虑对致癌作用敏感性可能存在的年龄差异;4)缺乏剂量反应证据以及EMF明显缺乏DNA反应性表明,采用安全(或不确定)因子或暴露边际类型的风险特征描述可能最为合适;5)EMF风险评估应至少能就暴露于EMF的致癌风险限度得出初步结论,还应确定一个有效的研究议程,旨在阐明与更全面评估相关的不确定性。