Norwegian Branch of the Nordic Cochrane Centre, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway.
Med Decis Making. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5):566-77. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10375853. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
To develop and obtain feedback about a summary format for Cochrane reviews that is accessible to a consumer audience, without oversimplification or incorrect presentation.
We developed 3 versions of a Plain Language Summary (PLS) format of a Cochrane Systematic Review. Using a semi-structured interview guide we tested these versions among 34 members of the public in Norway, Argentina, Canada, and Australia. The authors analyzed feedback, identified problems, and generated new solutions before retesting to produce a final version of a Plain Language Summary format.
Participants preferred results presented as words, supplemented by numbers in a table. There was a lack of understanding regarding the difference between a review and an individual study, that the effect is rarely an exact number, that evidence can be of low or high quality, and that level of quality is a separate issue from intervention effect. Participants also found it difficult to move between presentations of dichotomous and continuous outcomes. Rephrasing the introduction helped participants grasp the concept of a review. Confidence intervals were largely ignored or misunderstood. Our attempts to explain them were only partially successful. Text modifiers (''probably,'' ''may'') to convey different levels of quality were only partially understood, whereas symbols with explanations were more helpful. Participants often understood individual information elements about effect size and quality of these results, but did not always actively merge these elements.
Through testing and iteration the authors identified and addressed several problems, using explanations, rephrasing, and symbols to present scientific concepts. Other problems remain, including how best to present confidence intervals and continuous outcomes. Future research should also test information elements in combination rather than in isolation. The new Plain Language Summary format is being evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.
开发并获取一种对消费者具有可及性的 Cochrane 综述摘要格式,并反馈相关意见,该格式不应过于简化或错误呈现。
我们开发了 Cochrane 系统评价的 3 种简明报告(PLS)格式版本。我们使用半结构化访谈指南在挪威、阿根廷、加拿大和澳大利亚的 34 名公众中测试了这些版本。作者分析了反馈意见,发现问题,并提出新的解决方案,然后重新测试以生成最终的简明报告格式。
参与者更喜欢以文字形式呈现结果,并辅以表格中的数字。他们对综述和个体研究之间的区别、效果很少是确切数字、证据质量可能低或高、以及质量水平是与干预效果分开的问题存在理解上的困难。参与者还发现很难在二分类和连续结局的呈现之间转换。改写引言有助于参与者理解综述的概念。置信区间在很大程度上被忽略或误解。我们试图解释它们的尝试仅部分成功。传达不同质量水平的文本修饰语(“可能”、“或许”)仅部分被理解,而带有解释的符号则更有帮助。参与者通常理解关于效果大小和这些结果质量的个别信息元素,但并不总是主动将这些元素合并。
通过测试和迭代,作者使用解释、改写和符号来呈现科学概念,确定并解决了几个问题。其他问题仍然存在,包括如何最好地呈现置信区间和连续结局。未来的研究还应测试信息元素的组合,而不是孤立地测试。新的简明报告格式正在一项随机对照试验中进行评估。