Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Aarhus, Aarhus C, Denmark.
J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2010 Aug;30(8):573-8. doi: 10.1089/jir.2010.0063.
Type III interferons (IFNs; IFN-lambda) are antiviral cytokines with type I IFN-like biological functions, including antiviral activity. In this article we review the literature on IFN-lambda expression and propose that important differences exist between the mechanisms governing expression of the different classes of IFNs. Importantly, while IFN-beta is induced by coordinated action of a multifactor enhanceosome, and IFN-alpha expression is activated by multiple IFN regulatory factor (IRF)-binding cis-promoter elements, the type III IFNs are induced through independent actions of IRFs and nuclear factor-kappaB. Although these differences may appear minor at first glance, we propose that IFN-lambda expression is more flexible than IFN-alpha/beta expression, which could allow expression of type III IFNs in response to a wider range of stimuli compared with type I IFNs. Moreover, such a mechanism of induction will potentially render expression of type III IFNs less sensitive to microbial evasion strategies targeting the IRF pathway. Thus, the mechanisms governing type III IFN expression play an important part in dictating the biology of this antiviral cytokine.
III 型干扰素(IFN;IFN-λ)是具有 I 型 IFN 样生物学功能的抗病毒细胞因子,包括抗病毒活性。本文综述了 IFN-λ表达的文献,并提出调控不同类型 IFN 表达的机制存在重要差异。重要的是,虽然 IFN-β 是由多因素增强子协同作用诱导的,IFN-α 的表达是由多个 IFN 调节因子(IRF)结合顺式启动子元件激活的,但 III 型 IFNs 是通过 IRF 和核因子-κB 的独立作用诱导的。尽管这些差异乍一看似乎微不足道,但我们提出 IFN-λ 的表达比 IFN-α/β 的表达更灵活,这可能使 III 型 IFNs 的表达能够对更广泛的刺激作出反应,而不是 I 型 IFNs。此外,这种诱导机制将使 III 型 IFNs 的表达不太容易受到针对 IRF 途径的微生物逃避策略的影响。因此,调控 III 型 IFN 表达的机制在决定这种抗病毒细胞因子的生物学特性方面起着重要作用。