Department of Biochemistry, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, USA.
J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2010 Aug;30(8):597-602. doi: 10.1089/jir.2010.0058.
The discovery that type I interferon (IFN-alpha/beta) inhibited tumor cell growth was welcomed initially with great excitement as it rapidly became a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved drug to treat several forms of cancer. In time, this enthusiasm diminished as severe toxicity associated with IFN-alpha administration, resistance to the therapy, or less than optimal responses became evident in cancer patients, thus restricting its clinical use and reducing its potential as an anticancer drug. The recent discovery of a third type of IFN [IFN-lambda/interleukin (IL)-29/IL-28], which shares the same biological properties of type I IFNs, opens the door for evaluating the therapeutic potential of IFN-lambda as it uses a distinct receptor complex whose expression, unlike type I IFN receptors, is restricted to cells of specific lineage. It is unclear whether the mechanism by which type III IFNs restrict tumor cell proliferation is different or the same from the one utilized by type I IFN. Nevertheless, accumulating evidence as described in this review suggests that, in contrast to IFN-alpha therapy, IFN-lambda therapy could be less toxic and suitable for certain types of malignancies as not all cells are responsive to this cytokine.
干扰素(IFN-α/β)抑制肿瘤细胞生长的发现最初令人非常兴奋,因为它很快被美国食品和药物管理局批准用于治疗多种癌症。随着干扰素-α给药的严重毒性、对治疗的耐药性或癌症患者的反应不理想变得明显,这种热情逐渐消退,从而限制了其临床应用并降低了其作为抗癌药物的潜力。最近发现了第三种干扰素[IFN-λ/白细胞介素(IL)-29/IL-28],它与 I 型 IFNs 具有相同的生物学特性,为评估 IFN-λ 的治疗潜力开辟了道路,因为它使用了一种独特的受体复合物,其表达与 I 型 IFN 受体不同,仅限于特定谱系的细胞。目前尚不清楚 III 型 IFNs 限制肿瘤细胞增殖的机制与 I 型 IFN 所利用的机制是否不同或相同。然而,正如本文综述所述,越来越多的证据表明,与 IFN-α 治疗相比,IFN-λ 治疗的毒性可能更小,并且适合某些类型的恶性肿瘤,因为并非所有细胞对这种细胞因子都有反应。