Suppr超能文献

争议中。血糖变异性与糖尿病并发症风险:我们需要知道答案。

For debate. Glucose variability and diabetes complication risk: we need to know the answer.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Hull Royal Infirmary, University of Hull, Hull HU3 2JZ, UK.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2010 Aug;27(8):868-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02929.x.

Abstract

There is still a debate as to whether or not glucose variability contributes to diabetes complication risk. There is much in vitro laboratory evidence that glycaemic instability gives rise to increased production of reactive oxygen species and has a detrimental effect on endothelial dysfunction. While some in vivo studies have also shown similar findings in patients with or without diabetes, others have been unable to confirm any association. Furthermore, clinical studies which have sought to translate this possible risk into an increased likelihood of developing micro- or macrovascular complications have so far not demonstrated an effect. However, few of these trials were specifically designed to establish any influence of glucose fluctuations. This issue is now one of the largest remaining unanswered questions in diabetes. While this article focuses on the data which do not support a role for glucose variability in the development of complications, it also highlights the need for further studies to be performed which will definitively resolve the matter.

摘要

关于葡萄糖变异性是否会增加糖尿病并发症风险,目前仍存在争议。有大量体外实验室证据表明,血糖不稳定会导致活性氧的产生增加,并对内皮功能障碍产生不利影响。虽然一些体内研究也表明糖尿病患者或非糖尿病患者存在类似的发现,但其他研究未能证实存在任何关联。此外,旨在将这种潜在风险转化为发生微血管或大血管并发症的可能性增加的临床研究迄今并未显示出任何效果。然而,这些试验中很少有专门设计来确定葡萄糖波动的任何影响。这个问题是糖尿病中最大的未解决问题之一。虽然本文重点介绍了不支持葡萄糖变异性在并发症发展中起作用的数据,但也强调需要进行进一步的研究来明确解决这个问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验