Suppr超能文献

化妆品成分体外眼刺激试验的实验室间验证。(2) 鸡胚绒毛尿囊膜(CAM)试验。

Interlaboratory validation of in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients. (2) Chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) test.

作者信息

Hagino S, Kinoshita S, Tani N, Nakamura T, Ono N, Konishi K, Iimura H, Kojima H, Ohno Y

机构信息

Japan Cosmetic Industry Association, Hatsumei Bldg, 9-14, Toranomon 2-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105Japan; Shiseido Safety & Analytical Research Center, 1050 Nippa-cho, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama 223Japan.

出版信息

Toxicol In Vitro. 1999 Feb;13(1):99-113. doi: 10.1016/s0887-2333(98)00065-4.

Abstract

A chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay evaluates the blood vessel reaction and damage to the CAM of a fertilized hen's egg. Two types of CAM assays, the hen's egg test-chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM) method and the chorioallantoic membrane-trypan blue staining (CAM-TB) method, were evaluated as alternative methods to the Draize eye irritation test (Draize test). The validation project was composed of three test phases in which 10, 15 and 14 test chemicals, respectively, were evaluated. The test procedure of the five independent laboratories was controlled under the same standard operating procedure (SOP). The interlaboratory variation was relatively high for both methods. However, the rank correlation was relatively high among the values obtained by the five laboratories. The variation associated with the CAM-TB method was smaller than that of the HET-CAM method, which requires macroscopic observation, suggesting that the objectivity and quantitativeness differs between the assay systems. The average values using these two methods were compared with the maximum average Draize total score (MAS). The correlation coefficient (r) between the HET-CAM scores and the MAS was 0.688. This suggests that a simple linear regression may not be appropriate for HET-CAM. However, the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs) was relatively high (rs=0.802). In contrast, the CAM-TB test results showed a good correlation with the MAS when the test chemicals were classified according to their physical properties (r=0.801, liquid and r=0.926, powder). These results suggest that both the HET-CAM and CAM-TB methods may present alternative method of evaluation of eye irritation despite problems of interlaboratory reproducibility.

摘要

鸡胚绒毛尿囊膜(CAM)试验用于评估受精鸡蛋的绒毛尿囊膜的血管反应和损伤情况。绒毛尿囊膜试验的两种类型,即鸡蛋试验 - 绒毛尿囊膜(HET - CAM)法和绒毛尿囊膜 - 台盼蓝染色(CAM - TB)法,被评估作为替代兔眼刺激试验(Draize试验)的方法。验证项目由三个试验阶段组成,分别对10种、15种和14种受试化学品进行评估。五个独立实验室的试验程序按照相同的标准操作规程(SOP)进行控制。两种方法的实验室间差异都相对较高。然而,五个实验室获得的值之间的等级相关性相对较高。与需要宏观观察的HET - CAM法相比,CAM - TB法的差异较小,这表明两种检测系统的客观性和定量性有所不同。使用这两种方法得到的平均值与最大平均Draize总分(MAS)进行了比较。HET - CAM评分与MAS之间的相关系数(r)为0.688。这表明简单线性回归可能不适用于HET - CAM。然而,Spearman等级相关系数(rs)相对较高(rs = 0.802)。相比之下,当根据受试化学品的物理性质进行分类时,CAM - TB试验结果与MAS显示出良好的相关性(r = 0.801,液体;r = 0.926,粉末)。这些结果表明,尽管存在实验室间重现性问题,但HET - CAM和CAM - TB方法都可能是评估眼刺激的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验