Suppr超能文献

化妆品成分体外眼刺激试验的实验室间验证。(8) SIRC细胞毒性试验的评估。

Interlaboratory validation of the in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients. (8) Evaluation of cytotoxicity tests on SIRC cells.

作者信息

Tani N, Kinoshita S, Okamoto Y, Kotani M, Itagaki H, Murakami N, Sugiura S, Usami M, Kato K, Kojima H, Ohno T, Saijo K, Kato M, Hayashi M, Ohno Y

机构信息

Japan Cosmetic Industry Association, Hatsumei Bldg, 9-14, Toranomon 2-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105Japan; POLA Corporation, 560 Kashio-cho, Totsuka-ku, Yokohama 244Japan.

出版信息

Toxicol In Vitro. 1999 Feb;13(1):175-87. doi: 10.1016/s0887-2333(98)00071-x.

Abstract

Two common assays, the neutral red uptake assay (SIRC-NRU) and the crystal violet staining assay (SIRC-CVS), were evaluated as alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test (Draize test).The cytotoxicity of thirty-eight cosmetic ingredients as well as a physiological saline solution was determined on SIRC cells at five to seven laboratories. SIRC-NRU and SIRC-CVS were performed according to the common standard operating procedure (SOP). The 50% effective concentration (EC(50)) was determined for each ingredient. The EC(50) of SIRC-CVS was similar to that of SIRC-NRU, showing a strong correlation (r=0.995). The coefficient of variation (CV) of EC(50) which represents the interlaboratory reproducibility of SIRC-NRU was 32.1%, whereas that of SIRC-CVS was 32.8%. The logarithmically transformed EC(50) values showed a strong correlation with the maximal average Draize total score (MAS) (SIRC-NRU: r=-0.816 (n=30), SIRC-CVS: r=-0.805 (n=29)). Both methods could be applied to water-insoluble substances and dyes. However, strong acids, alkanolamines and alcohols had a tendency to deviate from the linear regression lines which were obtained from the in vivo and in vitro data for both methods in the present study. These results suggest that cytotoxicological testing on SIRC cells may provide an alternative method to the Draize test for cosmetic ingredients.

摘要

评估了两种常用试验,即中性红摄取试验(SIRC-NRU)和结晶紫染色试验(SIRC-CVS),作为替代兔眼刺激试验(Draize试验)的方法。在五到七个实验室中,测定了38种化妆品成分以及一种生理盐溶液对SIRC细胞的细胞毒性。SIRC-NRU和SIRC-CVS按照通用标准操作规程(SOP)进行。测定了每种成分的50%有效浓度(EC50)。SIRC-CVS的EC50与SIRC-NRU的相似,显示出很强的相关性(r = 0.995)。代表SIRC-NRU实验室间再现性的EC50变异系数(CV)为32.1%,而SIRC-CVS的为32.8%。经对数转换的EC50值与最大平均Draize总分(MAS)显示出很强的相关性(SIRC-NRU:r = -0.816(n = 30),SIRC-CVS:r = -0.805(n = 29))。两种方法都可应用于水不溶性物质和染料。然而,强酸、链烷醇胺和醇类有偏离本研究中两种方法的体内和体外数据所得线性回归线的趋势。这些结果表明,对SIRC细胞进行细胞毒理学测试可能为化妆品成分的Draize试验提供一种替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验