Suppr超能文献

新生儿听力筛查未通过导致的传导性听力障碍。

Conductive impairment in newborn who failed the newborn hearing screening.

机构信息

Sao Paulo Federal University/UNIFESP/Paulista Medical School/EPM, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 May-Jun;76(3):347-54. doi: 10.1590/S1808-86942010000300013.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

In newborn hearing screening little importance is attributed to changes in the middle ear. Children with secretory otitis in the neonatal period are at risk for developing otitis media in the first year of life.

AIM

To determine if children who failed the hearing screening because of conductive hearing loss have more episodes of conductive hearing impairment during their first years of life.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study group comprised 62 children who failed the screening for conductive impairment. The control was made up of 221 who passed. Both had audiologic and otolaryngological assistance and were compared regarding the occurrence of conductive disorder. Were used the Fisher's Exact test for statistical analysis and logistic regression models. The study was prospective and retrospective.

RESULTS

Children who failed the screening by conductive disorder had more episodes of otitis media during the first year of life than those who did not fail, with statistically significant difference.

CONCLUSION

Infants who failed the screening in the first month of life for conductive alteration are more likely to experience otitis in the first year of life. The high incidence of otitis indicates the need for joint action with otolaryngologist for diagnosis of such changes.

摘要

背景

新生儿听力筛查中,中耳变化往往得不到重视。新生儿期分泌性中耳炎患儿有发生婴幼儿期中耳炎的风险。

目的

确定因传导性听力损失而未通过听力筛查的儿童在其生命的最初几年中是否有更多次传导性听力障碍发作。

材料和方法

研究组包括 62 名因传导性听力障碍而未通过筛查的儿童。对照组由 221 名通过的儿童组成。两组均接受了听力学和耳鼻喉科的辅助,并比较了传导性障碍的发生情况。统计分析采用 Fisher 确切检验和逻辑回归模型。该研究为前瞻性和回顾性研究。

结果

因传导性障碍而未通过筛查的儿童在生命的第一年中更频繁地发生中耳炎,与未未通过筛查的儿童相比,差异具有统计学意义。

结论

在生命的第一个月因传导性改变而未通过筛查的婴儿更有可能在生命的第一年中发生中耳炎。中耳炎的高发病率表明需要与耳鼻喉科医生联合诊断此类变化。

相似文献

2
Middle ear effusion and newborn hearing screening.中耳积液与新生儿听力筛查
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Feb;280(2):643-649. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07524-2. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
3
Long-term follow-up of otitis media with effusion in neonatal hearing screening.新生儿听力筛查中分泌性中耳炎的长期随访
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jul;182:112017. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112017. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
4
Newborn hearing screening may predict Eustachian tube dysfunction.新生儿听力筛查可能预测咽鼓管功能障碍。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Dec;79(12):2099-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.09.021. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
5
Evaluation of hearing loss after failed neonatal hearing screening.新生儿听力筛查未通过后听力损失的评估。
J Pediatr. 2009 Nov;155(5):646-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.05.003. Epub 2009 Jul 19.
8
Conductive hearing loss and speech development.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1988 May;81(5 Pt 2):1015-20. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(88)90171-6.

本文引用的文献

4
Prevalence rates of otitis media with effusion from 0 to 2 years of age: healthy-born versus high-risk-born infants.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1999 Mar 15;47(3):243-51. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(98)00185-2.
7
Neonatal hearing screening with otoscopy, auditory brain stem response, and otoacoustic emissions.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Jun;116(6 Pt 1):597-603. doi: 10.1016/S0194-59989770234-1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验