• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西圣卡塔琳娜州一家三级医院妇产科新生儿听力筛查的流行病学概况

Epidemiological Profile of Neonates in Hearing Screening at a Maternity of a Tertiary Hospital in the state of Santa Catarina, Brazil.

作者信息

Diego Gimenes Lopes Juan, Disconzi Dallegrave Carolina, Hellmann Delfino Nadine, Lauxen Rúbia, Marcelino Taise, Eduardo Monteiro Zappelini Carlos

机构信息

Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL), Tubarão, SC, Brazil.

出版信息

Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Aug 4;27(3):e412-e422. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1770918. eCollection 2023 Jul.

DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1770918
PMID:37564481
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10411195/
Abstract

The newborn hearing screening (NHS) test aims the early diagnostic of hearing deficits that may also harm the full development of communication and learning of the affected child.  Trace the clinical and epidemiological profile of children born between July 2016 and July 2019; in addition to the outcome of the NHSs and factors related to failure in the hearing tests at a maternity of a tertiary hospital in Santa Catarina, Brazil.  The present is a cross-sectional study. A census of those born in the period defined for study was performed and a script was developed for the review of medical records, based on the literature.  The sample can be considered homogeneous in relation to gender and age. The pregnant women had an average of 30.9 years. There were 30 neonates (1.9%) that did not undergo NHS. New evaluations were required in 288 patients (18.2%). Finally, 24 (1.5% of the population) remained with insufficient results in the retest. The following variables achieved statistical relevance with higher failure rates in tests and/or retests: natural delivery (  = 0.007), arterial hypertension present (  = 0.002), use of hydralazine (  = 0.038), and use of dipyrone in the test (  = 0.041) and retest (  = 0.003). Younger mothers had higher levels of normality in the test (  = 0.003) and retest (  = 0.161). The correlations between the other variables and the outcomes were not statistically significant.  False positives (62.8%) in the first test showed a value higher than the ideal goal; those who did not undergo the NHS (1.9%) and who needed evaluation by a specialist, due to failure in the retest (1.5%), are within the quality goals defined by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) in 2007.

摘要

新生儿听力筛查(NHS)测试旨在早期诊断可能会影响受影响儿童沟通和学习全面发展的听力缺陷。追踪2016年7月至2019年7月期间出生儿童的临床和流行病学概况;此外,还要了解巴西圣卡塔琳娜州一家三级医院产科新生儿听力筛查的结果以及与听力测试失败相关的因素。本研究为横断面研究。对研究定义时间段内出生的儿童进行普查,并根据文献制定了病历审查脚本。该样本在性别和年龄方面可视为同质。孕妇平均年龄为30.9岁。有30名新生儿(1.9%)未接受新生儿听力筛查。288名患者(18.2%)需要重新评估。最后,24名患者(占总人群的1.5%)复查结果仍不充分。以下变量在测试和/或复查中失败率较高,具有统计学相关性:自然分娩(P = 0.007)、患有动脉高血压(P = 0.002)、使用肼屈嗪(P = 0.038)以及在测试(P = 0.041)和复查(P = 0.003)中使用安乃近。年轻母亲在测试(P = 0.003)和复查(P = 0.161)中的正常率较高。其他变量与结果之间的相关性无统计学意义。首次测试中的假阳性率(62.8%)高于理想目标;未接受新生儿听力筛查的比例(1.9%)以及因复查失败需要专科医生评估的比例(1.5%)均在2007年婴儿听力联合委员会(JCIH)定义的质量目标范围内。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5c/10411195/7408e1b06c18/10-1055-s-0043-1770918-i0492or-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5c/10411195/18fd490ea561/10-1055-s-0043-1770918-i0492or-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5c/10411195/206827e4bbb4/10-1055-s-0043-1770918-i0492or-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5c/10411195/a93841594ca6/10-1055-s-0043-1770918-i0492or-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5c/10411195/ef219ccae39e/10-1055-s-0043-1770918-i0492or-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5c/10411195/fabf362d9931/10-1055-s-0043-1770918-i0492or-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5c/10411195/7408e1b06c18/10-1055-s-0043-1770918-i0492or-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5c/10411195/18fd490ea561/10-1055-s-0043-1770918-i0492or-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5c/10411195/206827e4bbb4/10-1055-s-0043-1770918-i0492or-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5c/10411195/a93841594ca6/10-1055-s-0043-1770918-i0492or-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5c/10411195/ef219ccae39e/10-1055-s-0043-1770918-i0492or-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5c/10411195/fabf362d9931/10-1055-s-0043-1770918-i0492or-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5c/10411195/7408e1b06c18/10-1055-s-0043-1770918-i0492or-6.jpg

相似文献

1
Epidemiological Profile of Neonates in Hearing Screening at a Maternity of a Tertiary Hospital in the state of Santa Catarina, Brazil.巴西圣卡塔琳娜州一家三级医院妇产科新生儿听力筛查的流行病学概况
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Aug 4;27(3):e412-e422. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1770918. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Universal neonatal audiological screening: experience of the University Hospital of Pisa.普遍新生儿听力筛查:比萨大学医院的经验。
Ital J Pediatr. 2011 Apr 11;37:16. doi: 10.1186/1824-7288-37-16.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Congenital syphilis associated with hearing screening failure in southern Brazilian newborns.先天性梅毒与巴西南部新生儿听力筛查失败相关。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Nov-Dec;88 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S20-S24. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.07.003. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
5
Early detection of neonatal hearing loss by otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response over 10 years of experience.通过耳声发射和听性脑干反应早期检测新生儿听力损失:超过10年的经验
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Dec;127:109647. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109647. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
6
The Effects of Clinical Factors and Neonatal Morbidities on Hearing Screening among Neonatal Admissions.临床因素及新生儿疾病对新生儿入院听力筛查的影响
Curr Pediatr Rev. 2022;18(1):59-63. doi: 10.2174/1573396317666211129092341.
7
Quality indicators in a newborn hearing screening service.新生儿听力筛查服务中的质量指标。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 May-Jun;81(3):255-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
8
Neonatal hearing screening using a smartphone-based otoacoustic emission device: A comparative study.使用基于智能手机的耳声发射设备进行新生儿听力筛查:一项比较研究。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Feb;177:111862. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.111862. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
9
Analysis of the Referral Rates of Newborn Hearing Screening Test According to Childbirth Delivery Methods in Neonatal Care Units.新生儿护理单位中按分娩方式分析新生儿听力筛查测试的转诊率
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 29;10(13):2923. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132923.
10
Auditory evaluation of infants born to COVID19 positive mothers.对 COVID19 阳性母亲所生婴儿的听觉评估。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2022 Mar-Apr;43(2):103379. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103379. Epub 2022 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality measures of two-stage newborn hearing screening: systematic review and meta-analysis.两阶段新生儿听力筛查的质量指标:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 16;13:1566478. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1566478. eCollection 2025.
2
Newborn Hearing Screening - An Implementation Analysis.新生儿听力筛查 - 实施分析。
In Vivo. 2024 Jul-Aug;38(4):1939-1946. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13650.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of gestational disorders on preterm birth, low birthweight, and NICU admission.妊娠并发症对早产、低出生体重和新生儿重症监护病房入住率的影响。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Feb;303(2):419-426. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05760-7. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
2
[Obstetric care models in the Southern Region of Brazil and associated factors].[巴西南部地区的产科护理模式及相关因素]
Cad Saude Publica. 2019 Mar 25;35(3):e00093118. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00093118.
3
Association of Maternal First-Trimester Ondansetron Use With Cardiac Malformations and Oral Clefts in Offspring.
母亲在孕早期使用昂丹司琼与后代心脏畸形和口腔裂的关系。
JAMA. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2429-2437. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18307.
4
First trimester ondansetron exposure and risk of structural birth defects.孕早期昂丹司琼暴露与结构出生缺陷风险。
Reprod Toxicol. 2019 Jan;83:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
5
[Spatial and temporal analysis of the coverage for neonatal hearing screening in Brazil (2008-2015)].[巴西新生儿听力筛查覆盖率的时空分析(2008 - 2015年)]
Cien Saude Colet. 2017 Nov;22(11):3615-3624. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320172211.21452016.
6
Management of Hypertensive Crisis for the Obstetrician/Gynecologist.妇产科医生对高血压急症的管理
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2016 Dec;43(4):623-637. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
7
[Newborn hearing screening in Rio de Janeiro's municipal network, Brazil].[巴西里约热内卢市立医疗网络中的新生儿听力筛查]
Cien Saude Colet. 2015 Jan;20(1):57-63. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232014201.21002013.
8
Quality indicators in a newborn hearing screening service.新生儿听力筛查服务中的质量指标。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 May-Jun;81(3):255-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
9
Chronic hypertension in pregnancy and the risk of congenital malformations: a cohort study.妊娠合并慢性高血压与先天性畸形风险:一项队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;212(3):337.e1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.09.031. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
10
Use of medicines with unknown fetal risk among parturient women from the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort (Brazil).2004年佩洛塔斯出生队列研究(巴西)中,产妇使用胎儿风险未知药物的情况。
J Pregnancy. 2012;2012:257597. doi: 10.1155/2012/257597. Epub 2012 Dec 31.