Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Universitaetsstrasse 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Aug;99(2):366-79. doi: 10.1037/a0019982.
Modern personality theories differ in their assumptions about the structure and etiology of the interplay between personality traits and motivational constructs. The present study examined the genetic and environmental sources of the interplay between the Big Five and major life goals concurrently and across time in order to provide a more decisive evaluation of the conflicting assumptions stated in the five-factor theory as opposed to socioanalytic conceptions. Traits and goals were assessed twice across a 5-year period in a sample of 217 identical and 112 fraternal twin pairs from the Bielefeld Longitudinal Study of Adult Twins. About 30% of the variance in agency and communion life goals was genetic; the remaining variance was due to nonshared environmental effects, whereas shared environmental effects were negligible. Both heritable and environmental variance in goals could partly be accounted for by genetic and nonshared environmental effects on personality traits. Across time, we revealed reciprocal genetic and environmental effects between traits and life goals. In sum, our findings yield partial support for both of the 2 competing personality theories, suggesting a readjusted picture of the interplay between traits and goals.
现代人格理论在人格特质和动机结构之间相互作用的结构和病因假设上存在差异。本研究同时在横断和纵向两个时间点上,检验了大五人格和主要生活目标之间相互作用的遗传和环境来源,以对五因素理论和社会分析概念中相互矛盾的假设进行更具决定性的评估。在比勒费尔德成人双胞胎纵向研究中,对 217 对同卵双胞胎和 112 对异卵双胞胎的样本进行了为期 5 年的两次人格和目标评估。大约 30%的能动性和交际生活目标的方差是遗传的;其余的方差归因于非共享环境效应,而共享环境效应可以忽略不计。人格特质的遗传和非共享环境效应可以部分解释目标的可遗传性和环境方差。随着时间的推移,我们发现特质和生活目标之间存在相互的遗传和环境影响。总的来说,我们的研究结果为两种相互竞争的人格理论提供了部分支持,这表明特质和目标之间相互作用的图景需要进行调整。