Department of Genetics, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Genome Biol Evol. 2010;2:609-19. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evq045. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
Molecular chaperones are highly conserved and ubiquitous proteins that help other proteins in the cell to fold. Pioneering work by Rutherford and Lindquist suggested that the chaperone Hsp90 could buffer (i.e., suppress) phenotypic variation in its client proteins and that alternate periods of buffering and expression of these variants might be important in adaptive evolution. More recently, Tokuriki and Tawfik presented an explicit mechanism for chaperone-dependent evolution, in which the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL facilitated the folding of clients that had accumulated structurally destabilizing but neofunctionalizing mutations in the protein core. But how important an evolutionary force is chaperonin-mediated buffering in nature? Here, we address this question by modeling the per-residue evolutionary rate of the crystallized E. coli proteome, evaluating the relative contributions of chaperonin buffering, functional importance, and structural features such as residue contact density. Previous findings suggest an interaction between codon bias and GroEL in limiting the effects of misfolding errors. Our results suggest that the buffering of deleterious mutations by GroEL increases the evolutionary rate of client proteins. We then examine the evolutionary fate of GroEL clients in the Mycoplasmas, a group of bacteria containing the only known organisms that lack chaperonins. We show that GroEL was lost once in the common ancestor of a monophyletic subgroup of Mycoplasmas, and we evaluate the effect of this loss on the subsequent evolution of client proteins, providing evidence that client homologs in 11 Mycoplasma species have lost their obligate dependency on GroEL for folding. Our analyses indicate that individual molecules such as chaperonins can have significant effects on proteome evolution through their modulation of protein folding.
分子伴侣是高度保守且普遍存在的蛋白质,可帮助细胞中的其他蛋白质折叠。Rutherford 和 Lindquist 的开创性工作表明,伴侣蛋白 Hsp90 可以缓冲(即抑制)其客户蛋白质的表型变异,并且这些变体的缓冲和表达的交替时期可能在适应性进化中很重要。最近,Tokuriki 和 Tawfik 提出了一种明确的伴侣蛋白依赖性进化机制,其中大肠杆菌伴侣蛋白 GroEL 促进了在蛋白质核心中积累了结构不稳定但具有新功能的突变的客户的折叠。但是,伴侣蛋白介导的缓冲在自然界中是多么重要的进化力量呢?在这里,我们通过模拟结晶大肠杆菌蛋白质组的每个残基的进化率来解决这个问题,评估伴侣蛋白缓冲,功能重要性以及残基接触密度等结构特征的相对贡献。先前的研究结果表明,密码子偏好与 GroEL 之间存在相互作用,可以限制错误折叠的影响。我们的结果表明,GroEL 缓冲有害突变会增加客户蛋白质的进化率。然后,我们检查了在支原体中缺乏伴侣蛋白的唯一已知生物组中 GroEL 客户的进化命运。我们表明,GroEL 在支原体的单系亚群的共同祖先中丢失了一次,我们评估了这种丢失对随后客户蛋白质进化的影响,提供了证据表明,11 种支原体物种中的 GroEL 客户同源物已经失去了对 GroEL 折叠的必需依赖性。我们的分析表明,单个分子,如伴侣蛋白,可以通过调节蛋白质折叠对蛋白质组进化产生重大影响。