• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《拯救脓毒症运动对急诊科严重脓毒症的认识和处理的影响:我们是否失败了?》

Impact of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign on the recognition and management of severe sepsis in the emergency department: are we failing?

机构信息

Emergency Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2011 Aug;28(8):670-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.089581. Epub 2010 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1136/emj.2009.089581
PMID:20660901
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Severe sepsis/septic shock (SS/SS) has a high mortality. The past decade lays witness to a concerted international effort to tackle this problem through the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC). However, bundle delivery remains problematic. In 2009, the College of Emergency Medicine (CEM) set out guidelines for the management of SS/SS. These set the standards for this audit.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the recognition and management of patients presenting with SS/SS across three emergency departments (EDs) within the West Midlands.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively over a 3-month period. Patients in the ED with a diagnostic code of, or presenting complaint suggestive of, sepsis, had their scanned notes assessed for evidence of SS/SS. Compliance with the CEM guidelines, and evidence of referral to the intensive care staff was evaluated.

RESULTS

255 patients with SS/SS were identified. Of these, 17% (44/255) were documented as septic by ED staff. The CEM standard of care was received in 41% of those with a documented diagnosis of severe sepsis in the ED, and 23% of patients with SS/SS overall. 89% of patients received the 'treatment' aspects of care: oxygen, IV antibiotics and IV fluids. Twelve patients with a raised lactate level and normal blood pressure (cryptic shock) failed to receive fluid resuscitation. 71% of patients with SS/SS had no documented discussion or consideration of referral to the intensive care unit.

CONCLUSIONS

The SSC has had some impact; however, there is still a long way to go. It is assumed that the picture is similar in EDs across the UK and recommendations are made based on these local findings.

摘要

背景

严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克(SS/SS)的死亡率很高。在过去的十年中,国际社会通过脓毒症存活运动(SSC)共同努力解决这一问题。然而,捆绑包的实施仍然存在问题。2009 年,急诊医学学院(CEM)制定了 SS/SS 管理指南。这些指南为本次审计设定了标准。

目的

评估在西米德兰兹地区的三个急诊部(ED)中出现 SS/SS 的患者的识别和管理情况。

方法

在三个月的时间里,我们回顾性地收集数据。在 ED 中,有诊断代码为或有提示败血症的主诉的患者,对其扫描的病历进行评估,以确定是否存在 SS/SS。评估对 CEM 指南的遵守情况以及向重症监护人员转诊的证据。

结果

确定了 255 例 SS/SS 患者。其中,17%(44/255)被 ED 工作人员记录为败血症。在 ED 中有明确诊断为严重败血症的患者中,有 41%接受了 CEM 标准治疗,而总体 SS/SS 患者中则有 23%接受了治疗。89%的患者接受了治疗方面的护理:吸氧、静脉抗生素和静脉补液。12 例乳酸水平升高但血压正常的患者(隐匿性休克)未接受液体复苏。71%的 SS/SS 患者没有记录讨论或考虑转至重症监护病房。

结论

SSC 已经产生了一些影响;然而,仍有很长的路要走。据推测,英国各地的 ED 情况都类似,并根据这些本地发现提出了建议。

相似文献

1
Impact of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign on the recognition and management of severe sepsis in the emergency department: are we failing?《拯救脓毒症运动对急诊科严重脓毒症的认识和处理的影响:我们是否失败了?》
Emerg Med J. 2011 Aug;28(8):670-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.089581. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
2
Failure to implement evidence-based clinical guidelines for sepsis at the ED.急诊科未能实施基于证据的脓毒症临床指南。
Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Sep;24(5):553-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.01.012.
3
An audit of compliance with the sepsis resuscitation care bundle in patients admitted to A&E with severe sepsis or septic shock.对因严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克入住急诊科的患者进行脓毒症复苏护理集束方案依从性审计。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2008 Oct;16(4):250-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2008.05.008. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
4
Time- and fluid-sensitive resuscitation for hemodynamic support of children in septic shock: barriers to the implementation of the American College of Critical Care Medicine/Pediatric Advanced Life Support Guidelines in a pediatric intensive care unit in a developing world.脓毒性休克患儿血流动力学支持的时间和液体敏感性复苏:在发展中国家一家儿科重症监护病房实施美国危重病医学会/儿科高级生命支持指南的障碍
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Dec;24(12):810-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31818e9f3a.
5
Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality.实施一系列用于严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克早期管理的质量指标与死亡率降低相关。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):1105-12. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259463.33848.3D.
6
The epidemiology of adults with severe sepsis and septic shock in Scottish emergency departments.苏格兰急诊科成人严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的流行病学。
Emerg Med J. 2013 May;30(5):397-401. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201361. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
7
Factors influencing compliance with early resuscitation bundle in the management of severe sepsis and septic shock.影响严重脓毒症和感染性休克早期复苏包管理依从性的因素。
Shock. 2012 Nov;38(5):474-9. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31826eea2b.
8
A survey of clinicians addressing the approach to the management of severe sepsis and septic shock in the United States.一项针对美国临床医生在严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理方法的调查。
J Crit Care. 2010 Dec;25(4):658.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.04.005. Epub 2010 Jun 19.
9
Impact of sepsis bundle strategy on outcomes of patients suffering from severe sepsis and septic shock in china.脓毒症集束化策略对中国严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者预后的影响
J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;44(4):735-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.07.084. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
10
Early goal-directed therapy, corticosteroid, and recombinant human activated protein C for the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department.急诊科早期目标导向治疗、皮质类固醇及重组人活化蛋白C治疗严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;13(1):109-13. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.08.005. Epub 2005 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding ICU Nursing Knowledge, Perceived Barriers, and Facilitators of Sepsis Recognition and Management: A Cross-Sectional Study.了解重症监护病房护理知识、脓毒症识别与管理的感知障碍及促进因素:一项横断面研究。
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Jan 13;7(1):e1200. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001200. eCollection 2025 Jan 1.
2
Dachengqi decoction ameliorates sepsis-induced liver injury by inhibiting the TGF-β1/Smad3 pathways.大承气汤通过抑制TGF-β1/Smad3信号通路改善脓毒症诱导的肝损伤。
J Tradit Complement Med. 2023 Sep 13;14(3):256-265. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2023.09.001. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Assessment of implementation methods in sepsis: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type 2 trial.
脓毒症实施方法评估:一项集群随机化混合 2 型试验研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Sep 29;24(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07644-y.
4
Sim-sepsis: improving sepsis treatment in the emergency department?模拟脓毒症:改善急诊科脓毒症治疗?
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2019 Sep 19;5(4):232-233. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000307. eCollection 2019.
5
Knowledge translation following the implementation of a state-wide Paediatric Sepsis Pathway in the emergency department- a multi-centre survey study.在急诊科实施全州范围的儿科脓毒症路径后进行知识转化——一项多中心调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 26;21(1):1161. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07128-2.
6
Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes markedly protected the brain against sepsis syndrome induced injury in rat.脂肪来源的间充质干细胞衍生的外泌体显著保护大鼠大脑免受脓毒症综合征诱导的损伤。
Am J Transl Res. 2019 Jul 15;11(7):3955-3971. eCollection 2019.
7
Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes alleviate overwhelming systemic inflammatory reaction and organ damage and improve outcome in rat sepsis syndrome.脂肪来源间充质干细胞衍生的外泌体可减轻大鼠脓毒症综合征中严重的全身炎症反应和器官损伤,并改善预后。
Am J Transl Res. 2018 Apr 15;10(4):1053-1070. eCollection 2018.
8
Barriers and facilitators towards implementing the Sepsis Six care bundle (BLISS-1): a mixed methods investigation using the theoretical domains framework.实施败血症六项护理包(BLISS-1)的障碍和促进因素:使用理论领域框架进行的混合方法研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Sep 19;25(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0437-2.
9
A complex endeavour: an ethnographic study of the implementation of the Sepsis Six clinical care bundle.一项复杂的工作:对脓毒症六联临床护理集束方案实施情况的人种志研究
Implement Sci. 2016 Nov 16;11(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0518-z.
10
Multimethod study of a large-scale programme to improve patient safety using a harm-free care approach.一项使用无伤害护理方法改善患者安全的大规模计划的多方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 22;6(9):e011886. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011886.