Suppr超能文献

对重要他人的健康影响:区分家庭影响和照护影响。

Health effects in significant others: separating family and care-giving effects.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy & Management and Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2011 Mar-Apr;31(2):292-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10374212. Epub 2010 Jul 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Changes in the health of patients may affect the health of so-called "significant others" in 2 distinct ways. First, an individual may provide informal care to the patient and be burdened by the process of care giving. We label this indirect effect of a patient's health on the health of the care giver the "care-giving effect." Second, a person may suffer from health losses because someone in his or her social environment is ill, regardless of his or her care-giving status. The health of the patient then directly affects the health of this significant other, which we label the "family effect."

METHODS

We investigate the occurrence of the family and care-giving effect in a convenience sample of Dutch care givers (n = 751). The family effect was approximated by the health status of the patient (measured on EuroQol-VAS), and the care-giving effect by the number of the care-giving tasks was provided. It was assumed that care givers' health is positively associated with patients' health, that is, the family effect, and negatively associated with care-giving burden, that is, the care-giving effect. Relationships are studied using multivariate regressions.

RESULTS

Our results support the existence of both types of health effects. The analysis shows that the 2 effects are separable and independently associated with the health of care givers. Not accounting for the family effect conflates the care-giving effect.

CONCLUSIONS

If the goal of health care policy is to optimize health, all important effects should be captured. The scope of economic evaluations should also include health effects in significant others. This study suggests that significant others include both care givers and broader groups of affected individuals, such as family members.

摘要

背景

患者健康状况的变化可能以两种不同的方式影响所谓的“重要他人”的健康。首先,个体可能会为患者提供非正式护理,并因护理过程而感到负担过重。我们将患者健康对护理人员健康的这种间接影响标记为“护理效应”。其次,一个人可能会因社交环境中的某个人患病而遭受健康损失,而无论他是否处于护理状态。然后,患者的健康会直接影响这位重要他人的健康,我们将其标记为“家庭效应”。

方法

我们在荷兰护理人员的便利样本(n=751)中调查了家庭效应和护理效应的发生情况。家庭效应由患者的健康状况(用 EuroQol-VAS 测量)近似表示,护理效应由提供的护理任务数量表示。我们假设护理人员的健康与患者的健康呈正相关,即家庭效应,与护理负担呈负相关,即护理效应。使用多元回归分析研究这些关系。

结果

我们的研究结果支持这两种类型的健康效应的存在。分析表明,这两种效应是可分离的,并且独立地与护理人员的健康相关。如果不考虑家庭效应,就会混淆护理效应。

结论

如果医疗保健政策的目标是优化健康,那么所有重要的影响都应该被捕捉到。经济评估的范围也应该包括重要他人的健康影响。本研究表明,重要他人包括护理人员和更广泛的受影响个体群体,如家庭成员。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验