• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Parental understanding of infant health information: health literacy, numeracy, and the Parental Health Literacy Activities Test (PHLAT).家长对婴儿健康信息的理解:健康素养、计算能力和父母健康素养活动测试(PHLAT)。
Acad Pediatr. 2010 Sep-Oct;10(5):309-16. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.06.007. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
2
Assessment of health literacy and numeracy among Spanish-Speaking parents of young children: validation of the Spanish Parental Health Literacy Activities Test (PHLAT Spanish).评估西班牙语为母语的幼儿家长的健康素养和数素养:西班牙父母健康素养活动测试(PHLAT 西班牙语)的验证。
Acad Pediatr. 2012 Jan-Feb;12(1):68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
3
The association of acculturation and health literacy, numeracy and health-related skills in Spanish-speaking caregivers of young children.西班牙语为母语的幼儿照顾者的文化适应与健康素养、计算能力和与健康相关技能的关系。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2013 Jun;15(3):492-8. doi: 10.1007/s10903-012-9613-7.
4
Development and validation of a Chinese parental health literacy questionnaire for caregivers of children 0 to 3 years old.开发并验证了一份针对 0 至 3 岁儿童照护者的中文家长健康素养问卷。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1670-9.
5
Parental misinterpretations of over-the-counter pediatric cough and cold medication labels.家长对非处方儿科止咳和感冒药标签的误解。
Pediatrics. 2009 Jun;123(6):1464-71. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0854.
6
Understanding of Information about Medicines Use among Parents of Pre-School Children in Serbia: Parental Pharmacotherapy Literacy Questionnaire (PTHL-SR).塞尔维亚学龄前儿童家长对药品信息的理解:家长药物治疗素养问卷(PTHL-SR)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 14;15(5):977. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050977.
7
Glycemic control in young children with diabetes: the role of parental health literacy.糖尿病幼儿的血糖控制:父母健康素养的作用。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jan;94(1):67-70. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
8
Development, validation and performance of a newly designed tool to evaluate functional medication literacy in Slovenia.开发、验证和性能评估一种新设计的工具,用于评估斯洛文尼亚的功能性药物素养。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Dec;42(6):1490-1498. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01138-6. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
9
Development and Validation of the Rating of CKD Knowledge Among Older Adults (Know-CKD) With Kidney Failure.慢性肾脏病老年人知识评分量表(Know-CKD)在肾衰竭患者中的制定与验证。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2024 May;83(5):569-577. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.09.024. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
10
Development and validation of the Diabetes Numeracy Test (DNT).糖尿病算术测试(DNT)的开发与验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 May 1;8:96. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-96.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and psychometric validation of a novel health literacy scale for family caregivers of preschool children.一种针对学龄前儿童家庭照顾者的新型健康素养量表的开发与心理测量学验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Mar 1;23(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02349-z.
2
Development and validation of a questionnaire on parental health literacy in the context of promoting healthy lifestyles during childhood: a study protocol.儿童期促进健康生活方式背景下父母健康素养问卷的编制与验证:一项研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 12;15(2):e088037. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088037.
3
Factors associated with COVID-19 misinformation rebuttal among college students: a descriptive study.与大学生 COVID-19 错误信息反驳相关的因素:一项描述性研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 17;11:1233414. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1233414. eCollection 2023.
4
Organizational Health Literacy as a Tool for Health Equity: Application in a High-Risk Infant Follow-Up Program.组织健康素养作为促进健康公平的工具:在高危婴儿随访项目中的应用
Children (Basel). 2023 Oct 6;10(10):1658. doi: 10.3390/children10101658.
5
Neighborhood Social Vulnerability and Interstage Weight Gain: Evaluating the Role of a Home Monitoring Program.社区社会脆弱性与过渡期体重增加:家庭监测计划作用评估。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Sep 19;12(18):e030029. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030029. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
6
A systematic review of the effectiveness of community-based interventions aimed at improving health literacy of parents/carers of children.一项针对旨在提高儿童家长/照料者健康素养的社区干预措施有效性的系统评价。
Perspect Public Health. 2025 Jan;145(1):25-31. doi: 10.1177/17579139231180746. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
7
Validity and Reliability of the Parental Health Literacy Questionnaire for Caregivers of Children Aged 0 to 3 Years in China.中国 0-3 岁儿童照护者健康素养问卷的信度和效度研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 1;19(23):16076. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316076.
8
The Parent Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ-Parent). Adaptation and validity testing with parents of children with epilepsy.家长健康素养问卷(HLQ-Parent)。对癫痫患儿家长进行的改编及效度测试。
Scand J Public Health. 2024 Feb;52(1):39-47. doi: 10.1177/14034948221123436. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
9
Measuring health literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of instruments from 1993 to 2021.测量健康素养:1993 年至 2021 年工具的系统评价和文献计量分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 15;17(7):e0271524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271524. eCollection 2022.
10
Digital Health Literacy: Bibliometric Analysis.数字健康素养:文献计量分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 6;24(7):e35816. doi: 10.2196/35816.

本文引用的文献

1
In search of 'low health literacy': threshold vs. gradient effect of literacy on health status and mortality.探寻“低健康素养”:文化程度对健康状况和死亡率的门槛效应与梯度效应。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 May;70(9):1335-41. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.013. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
2
Brief report: Parent's health literacy among high-risk adolescents with insulin dependent diabetes.简要报告:患有胰岛素依赖型糖尿病的高危青少年父母的健康素养。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2010 May;35(4):436-40. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp077. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
3
Color-coding improves parental understanding of body mass index charting.颜色编码可提高家长对体重指数图表的理解。
Acad Pediatr. 2009 Sep-Oct;9(5):330-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2009.05.028. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
4
Health Literacy among Parents of Pediatric Patients.家长的健康素养与儿科患者。
West J Emerg Med. 2008 Aug;9(3):130-4.
5
Parental misinterpretations of over-the-counter pediatric cough and cold medication labels.家长对非处方儿科止咳和感冒药标签的误解。
Pediatrics. 2009 Jun;123(6):1464-71. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0854.
6
Education, literacy, and health: Mediating effects on hypertension knowledge and control.教育、文化程度和健康:对高血压知识和控制的中介作用。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jun;75(3):381-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.04.006. Epub 2009 May 12.
7
Literacy and child health: a systematic review.识字能力与儿童健康:一项系统综述。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Feb;163(2):131-40. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2008.539.
8
Low numeracy skills are associated with higher BMI.低算术能力与较高的体重指数相关。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Aug;16(8):1966-8. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.294. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
9
Association of numeracy and diabetes control.算术能力与糖尿病控制的关联。
Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 20;148(10):737-46. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-10-200805200-00006.
10
Development and validation of the Diabetes Numeracy Test (DNT).糖尿病算术测试(DNT)的开发与验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 May 1;8:96. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-96.

家长对婴儿健康信息的理解:健康素养、计算能力和父母健康素养活动测试(PHLAT)。

Parental understanding of infant health information: health literacy, numeracy, and the Parental Health Literacy Activities Test (PHLAT).

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-8300, USA.

出版信息

Acad Pediatr. 2010 Sep-Oct;10(5):309-16. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.06.007. Epub 2010 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2010.06.007
PMID:20674532
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2933956/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess parental health literacy and numeracy skills in understanding instructions for caring for young children, and to develop and validate a new parental health literacy scale, the Parental Health Literacy Activities Test (PHLAT).

METHODS

Caregivers of infants (age <13 months) were recruited in a cross-sectional study at pediatric clinics at 3 academic medical centers. Literacy and numeracy skills were assessed with previously validated instruments. Parental health literacy was assessed with the new 20-item PHLAT. Psychometric analyses were performed to assess item characteristics and to generate a shortened, 10-item version (PHLAT-10).

RESULTS

A total of 182 caregivers were recruited. Although 99% had adequate literacy skills, only 17% had better than ninth-grade numeracy skills. Mean score on the PHLAT was 68% (standard deviation 18); for example, only 47% of caregivers could correctly describe how to mix infant formula from concentrate, and only 69% could interpret a digital thermometer to determine whether an infant had a fever. Higher performance on the PHLAT was significantly correlated (P < .001) with education, literacy skill, and numeracy level (r = 0.29, 0.38, and 0.55 respectively). Caregivers with higher PHLAT scores were also more likely to interpret age recommendations for cold medications correctly (odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.02, 2.6). Internal reliability on the PHLAT was good (Kuder-Richardson coefficient of reliability = 0.76). The PHLAT-10 also demonstrated good validity and reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

Many parents do not understand common health information required to care for their infants. The PHLAT and PHLAT-10 have good reliability and validity and may be useful tools for identifying parents who need better communication of health-related instructions.

摘要

目的

评估父母理解照顾幼儿指导说明的健康素养和计算能力,并开发和验证一种新的父母健康素养量表,即父母健康素养活动测试(PHLAT)。

方法

在 3 家学术医疗中心的儿科诊所进行横断面研究,招募婴儿(<13 个月)的照顾者。使用先前验证过的工具评估读写和计算能力。使用新的 20 项 PHLAT 评估父母健康素养。进行心理测量分析以评估项目特征并生成缩短的 10 项版本(PHLAT-10)。

结果

共招募了 182 位照顾者。尽管 99%的照顾者具有足够的读写能力,但只有 17%的照顾者具有高于九年级的计算能力。PHLAT 的平均得分为 68%(标准差 18%);例如,只有 47%的照顾者能够正确描述如何从浓缩物中混合婴儿配方奶,只有 69%的照顾者能够解读数字温度计来确定婴儿是否发烧。PHLAT 得分较高与教育程度、读写能力和计算水平显著相关(P<.001,r 分别为 0.29、0.38 和 0.55)。PHLAT 得分较高的照顾者也更有可能正确解读感冒药的年龄推荐(比值比 1.6,95%置信区间 1.02,2.6)。PHLAT 的内部可靠性良好(Kuder-Richardson 可靠性系数为 0.76)。PHLAT-10 也具有良好的有效性和可靠性。

结论

许多父母不理解照顾婴儿所需的常见健康信息。PHLAT 和 PHLAT-10 具有良好的信度和效度,可能是识别需要更好沟通健康相关指导的父母的有用工具。