Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-8300, USA.
Acad Pediatr. 2010 Sep-Oct;10(5):309-16. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.06.007. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
To assess parental health literacy and numeracy skills in understanding instructions for caring for young children, and to develop and validate a new parental health literacy scale, the Parental Health Literacy Activities Test (PHLAT).
Caregivers of infants (age <13 months) were recruited in a cross-sectional study at pediatric clinics at 3 academic medical centers. Literacy and numeracy skills were assessed with previously validated instruments. Parental health literacy was assessed with the new 20-item PHLAT. Psychometric analyses were performed to assess item characteristics and to generate a shortened, 10-item version (PHLAT-10).
A total of 182 caregivers were recruited. Although 99% had adequate literacy skills, only 17% had better than ninth-grade numeracy skills. Mean score on the PHLAT was 68% (standard deviation 18); for example, only 47% of caregivers could correctly describe how to mix infant formula from concentrate, and only 69% could interpret a digital thermometer to determine whether an infant had a fever. Higher performance on the PHLAT was significantly correlated (P < .001) with education, literacy skill, and numeracy level (r = 0.29, 0.38, and 0.55 respectively). Caregivers with higher PHLAT scores were also more likely to interpret age recommendations for cold medications correctly (odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.02, 2.6). Internal reliability on the PHLAT was good (Kuder-Richardson coefficient of reliability = 0.76). The PHLAT-10 also demonstrated good validity and reliability.
Many parents do not understand common health information required to care for their infants. The PHLAT and PHLAT-10 have good reliability and validity and may be useful tools for identifying parents who need better communication of health-related instructions.
评估父母理解照顾幼儿指导说明的健康素养和计算能力,并开发和验证一种新的父母健康素养量表,即父母健康素养活动测试(PHLAT)。
在 3 家学术医疗中心的儿科诊所进行横断面研究,招募婴儿(<13 个月)的照顾者。使用先前验证过的工具评估读写和计算能力。使用新的 20 项 PHLAT 评估父母健康素养。进行心理测量分析以评估项目特征并生成缩短的 10 项版本(PHLAT-10)。
共招募了 182 位照顾者。尽管 99%的照顾者具有足够的读写能力,但只有 17%的照顾者具有高于九年级的计算能力。PHLAT 的平均得分为 68%(标准差 18%);例如,只有 47%的照顾者能够正确描述如何从浓缩物中混合婴儿配方奶,只有 69%的照顾者能够解读数字温度计来确定婴儿是否发烧。PHLAT 得分较高与教育程度、读写能力和计算水平显著相关(P<.001,r 分别为 0.29、0.38 和 0.55)。PHLAT 得分较高的照顾者也更有可能正确解读感冒药的年龄推荐(比值比 1.6,95%置信区间 1.02,2.6)。PHLAT 的内部可靠性良好(Kuder-Richardson 可靠性系数为 0.76)。PHLAT-10 也具有良好的有效性和可靠性。
许多父母不理解照顾婴儿所需的常见健康信息。PHLAT 和 PHLAT-10 具有良好的信度和效度,可能是识别需要更好沟通健康相关指导的父母的有用工具。