Suppr超能文献

家长对婴儿健康信息的理解:健康素养、计算能力和父母健康素养活动测试(PHLAT)。

Parental understanding of infant health information: health literacy, numeracy, and the Parental Health Literacy Activities Test (PHLAT).

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-8300, USA.

出版信息

Acad Pediatr. 2010 Sep-Oct;10(5):309-16. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.06.007. Epub 2010 Aug 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess parental health literacy and numeracy skills in understanding instructions for caring for young children, and to develop and validate a new parental health literacy scale, the Parental Health Literacy Activities Test (PHLAT).

METHODS

Caregivers of infants (age <13 months) were recruited in a cross-sectional study at pediatric clinics at 3 academic medical centers. Literacy and numeracy skills were assessed with previously validated instruments. Parental health literacy was assessed with the new 20-item PHLAT. Psychometric analyses were performed to assess item characteristics and to generate a shortened, 10-item version (PHLAT-10).

RESULTS

A total of 182 caregivers were recruited. Although 99% had adequate literacy skills, only 17% had better than ninth-grade numeracy skills. Mean score on the PHLAT was 68% (standard deviation 18); for example, only 47% of caregivers could correctly describe how to mix infant formula from concentrate, and only 69% could interpret a digital thermometer to determine whether an infant had a fever. Higher performance on the PHLAT was significantly correlated (P < .001) with education, literacy skill, and numeracy level (r = 0.29, 0.38, and 0.55 respectively). Caregivers with higher PHLAT scores were also more likely to interpret age recommendations for cold medications correctly (odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.02, 2.6). Internal reliability on the PHLAT was good (Kuder-Richardson coefficient of reliability = 0.76). The PHLAT-10 also demonstrated good validity and reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

Many parents do not understand common health information required to care for their infants. The PHLAT and PHLAT-10 have good reliability and validity and may be useful tools for identifying parents who need better communication of health-related instructions.

摘要

目的

评估父母理解照顾幼儿指导说明的健康素养和计算能力,并开发和验证一种新的父母健康素养量表,即父母健康素养活动测试(PHLAT)。

方法

在 3 家学术医疗中心的儿科诊所进行横断面研究,招募婴儿(<13 个月)的照顾者。使用先前验证过的工具评估读写和计算能力。使用新的 20 项 PHLAT 评估父母健康素养。进行心理测量分析以评估项目特征并生成缩短的 10 项版本(PHLAT-10)。

结果

共招募了 182 位照顾者。尽管 99%的照顾者具有足够的读写能力,但只有 17%的照顾者具有高于九年级的计算能力。PHLAT 的平均得分为 68%(标准差 18%);例如,只有 47%的照顾者能够正确描述如何从浓缩物中混合婴儿配方奶,只有 69%的照顾者能够解读数字温度计来确定婴儿是否发烧。PHLAT 得分较高与教育程度、读写能力和计算水平显著相关(P<.001,r 分别为 0.29、0.38 和 0.55)。PHLAT 得分较高的照顾者也更有可能正确解读感冒药的年龄推荐(比值比 1.6,95%置信区间 1.02,2.6)。PHLAT 的内部可靠性良好(Kuder-Richardson 可靠性系数为 0.76)。PHLAT-10 也具有良好的有效性和可靠性。

结论

许多父母不理解照顾婴儿所需的常见健康信息。PHLAT 和 PHLAT-10 具有良好的信度和效度,可能是识别需要更好沟通健康相关指导的父母的有用工具。

相似文献

5
Parental misinterpretations of over-the-counter pediatric cough and cold medication labels.
Pediatrics. 2009 Jun;123(6):1464-71. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0854.
7
Glycemic control in young children with diabetes: the role of parental health literacy.
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jan;94(1):67-70. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
8
Development, validation and performance of a newly designed tool to evaluate functional medication literacy in Slovenia.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Dec;42(6):1490-1498. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01138-6. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
9
Development and Validation of the Rating of CKD Knowledge Among Older Adults (Know-CKD) With Kidney Failure.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2024 May;83(5):569-577. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.09.024. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
10
Development and validation of the Diabetes Numeracy Test (DNT).
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 May 1;8:96. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-96.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and psychometric validation of a novel health literacy scale for family caregivers of preschool children.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Mar 1;23(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02349-z.
3
Factors associated with COVID-19 misinformation rebuttal among college students: a descriptive study.
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 17;11:1233414. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1233414. eCollection 2023.
5
Neighborhood Social Vulnerability and Interstage Weight Gain: Evaluating the Role of a Home Monitoring Program.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Sep 19;12(18):e030029. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030029. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
6
A systematic review of the effectiveness of community-based interventions aimed at improving health literacy of parents/carers of children.
Perspect Public Health. 2025 Jan;145(1):25-31. doi: 10.1177/17579139231180746. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
7
Validity and Reliability of the Parental Health Literacy Questionnaire for Caregivers of Children Aged 0 to 3 Years in China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 1;19(23):16076. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316076.
8
The Parent Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ-Parent). Adaptation and validity testing with parents of children with epilepsy.
Scand J Public Health. 2024 Feb;52(1):39-47. doi: 10.1177/14034948221123436. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
9
Measuring health literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of instruments from 1993 to 2021.
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 15;17(7):e0271524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271524. eCollection 2022.
10
Digital Health Literacy: Bibliometric Analysis.
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 6;24(7):e35816. doi: 10.2196/35816.

本文引用的文献

1
In search of 'low health literacy': threshold vs. gradient effect of literacy on health status and mortality.
Soc Sci Med. 2010 May;70(9):1335-41. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.013. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
2
Brief report: Parent's health literacy among high-risk adolescents with insulin dependent diabetes.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2010 May;35(4):436-40. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp077. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
3
Color-coding improves parental understanding of body mass index charting.
Acad Pediatr. 2009 Sep-Oct;9(5):330-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2009.05.028. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
4
Health Literacy among Parents of Pediatric Patients.
West J Emerg Med. 2008 Aug;9(3):130-4.
5
Parental misinterpretations of over-the-counter pediatric cough and cold medication labels.
Pediatrics. 2009 Jun;123(6):1464-71. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0854.
6
Education, literacy, and health: Mediating effects on hypertension knowledge and control.
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jun;75(3):381-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.04.006. Epub 2009 May 12.
7
Literacy and child health: a systematic review.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Feb;163(2):131-40. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2008.539.
8
Low numeracy skills are associated with higher BMI.
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Aug;16(8):1966-8. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.294. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
9
Association of numeracy and diabetes control.
Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 20;148(10):737-46. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-10-200805200-00006.
10
Development and validation of the Diabetes Numeracy Test (DNT).
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 May 1;8:96. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-96.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验