• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Validity and Reliability of the Parental Health Literacy Questionnaire for Caregivers of Children Aged 0 to 3 Years in China.中国 0-3 岁儿童照护者健康素养问卷的信度和效度研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 1;19(23):16076. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316076.
2
Development and validation of a Chinese parental health literacy questionnaire for caregivers of children 0 to 3 years old.开发并验证了一份针对 0 至 3 岁儿童照护者的中文家长健康素养问卷。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1670-9.
3
Improving Parental Health Literacy in Primary Caregivers of 0- to 3-Year-Old Children Through a WeChat Official Account: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.通过微信公众号提高 0-3 岁儿童主要照顾者的家长健康素养:整群随机对照试验。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jul 4;10:e54623. doi: 10.2196/54623.
4
Development and validation of the reproductive health literacy questionnaire for Chinese unmarried youth.中文未婚青年生殖健康素养问卷的编制及信效度检验
Reprod Health. 2021 Nov 13;18(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01278-6.
5
Development and validation of the family management scale for children with asthma (FMSCA).儿童哮喘家庭管理量表(FMSCA)的编制与验证
J Asthma. 2020 Apr;57(4):441-451. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1571085. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
6
Development and validation of a food and nutrition literacy questionnaire for Chinese school-age children.开发和验证中文版学龄儿童食物与营养素养问卷。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 6;16(1):e0244197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244197. eCollection 2021.
7
The validity of the Physical Literacy in Children Questionnaire in children aged 4 to 12.《儿童身体素养问卷》在 4 至 12 岁儿童中的有效性。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 21;24(1):869. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18343-x.
8
Measuring cancer caregiver health literacy: Validation of the Health Literacy of Caregivers Scale-Cancer (HLCS-C) in an Australian population.测量癌症护理者的健康素养:澳大利亚人群中护理者健康素养量表-癌症版(HLCS-C)的验证
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 May;26(3):330-344. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12524. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
9
Measuring General Health Literacy in Chinese adults: validation of the HLS-Q12 instrument.测量中国成年人的一般健康素养:HLS-Q12 工具的验证。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 15;24(1):1036. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17977-1.
10
A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy-report of children's physical literacy or constituting elements.系统评价教师代理报告儿童身体素养或构成要素的工具。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 8;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01162-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and evaluation of a health literacy scale for parasitic diseases.寄生虫病健康素养量表的编制与评价。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Sep 13;24(1):971. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09857-1.
2
Improving Parental Health Literacy in Primary Caregivers of 0- to 3-Year-Old Children Through a WeChat Official Account: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.通过微信公众号提高 0-3 岁儿童主要照顾者的家长健康素养:整群随机对照试验。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jul 4;10:e54623. doi: 10.2196/54623.
3
Community-based intervention WeChat official account to improve parental health literacy among primary caregivers of children aged 0 to 3 years: Protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.基于社区的干预 微信公众号提高 0 至 3 岁儿童主要照顾者的健康素养:一项整群随机对照试验方案。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 6;10:1039394. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1039394. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
A reliability and validity study of the electronic health literacy scale among stroke patients in China.中国脑卒中患者电子健康素养量表的信效度研究
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2023 Apr;30(3):272-280. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2021.2016100. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
2
Exploring health literacy and self-management after kidney transplantation: A prospective cohort study.肾移植后健康素养与自我管理的探索:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Feb;105(2):440-446. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.05.013. Epub 2021 May 12.
3
Parenting interventions to promote early child development in the first three years of life: A global systematic review and meta-analysis.养育干预措施促进生命最初三年的儿童早期发展:全球系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2021 May 10;18(5):e1003602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003602. eCollection 2021 May.
4
The Relationship of Parental Health Literacy to Health Outcomes of Children with Medical Complexity.父母健康素养与患有复杂疾病儿童健康结果的关系。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2021 Sep-Oct;60:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
5
Health literacy rates among pediatric tracheostomy caregivers.儿科气管切开术照护者的健康素养率。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Mar;142:110560. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110560. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
6
Aging and Functional Health Literacy: A Population-based Study.老龄化与功能性健康素养:一项基于人群的研究。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Sep;29(9):972-981. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.12.007. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
7
Health Literacy of Adolescents.青少年健康素养。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2020 Nov-Dec;55:116-119. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.08.020. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
8
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Persian version of the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles questionnaire (VISA-A).维多利亚运动学院跟腱评估问卷(VISA-A)波斯语版本的跨文化适应性、信度和效度
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Mar;44(6):983-991. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1781268. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
9
Parental health literacy and health knowledge, behaviours and outcomes in children: a cross-sectional survey.家长健康素养与儿童健康知识、行为和结果:一项横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 13;20(1):1096. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08881-5.
10
Health literacy in rural and urban populations: A systematic review.农村和城市人口的健康素养:系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Oct;103(10):2142-2154. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jun 20.

中国 0-3 岁儿童照护者健康素养问卷的信度和效度研究。

Validity and Reliability of the Parental Health Literacy Questionnaire for Caregivers of Children Aged 0 to 3 Years in China.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.

Department of Child Health Care, The Children's Hospital, and National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310052, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 1;19(23):16076. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316076.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192316076
PMID:36498150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9737177/
Abstract

Caregivers' health literacy plays a vital role in the quality of parenting and significantly impacts children's physical and psychological health. However, the instruments to assess the health literacy of caregivers of children aged 0 to 3 years are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese Parental Health Literacy Questionnaire (CPHLQ) in China. We conducted a cross-sectional study. Six hundred and thirty-four caregivers of children aged 0 to 3 years were recruited from Shandong, Yunnan, and Shaanxi Provinces, representing the eastern, central, and western regions of China, between November 2020 and January 2021. The reliability was evaluated by internal consistency reliability and split-half reliability. The construct validity was determined by confirmatory factor analysis. Social determinants of parental health literacy were assessed by multivariate linear regression model. Results showed that CPHLQ had satisfactory reliability and acceptable construct validity. Mothers compared to other types of caregivers, higher education levels, and nuclear or extended families compared to other family compositions were significantly associated with higher parental health literacy. The study further demonstrated that CPHLQ is a reliable and valid instrument to measure the health literacy of caregivers of children aged 0 to 3 years in the Chinese population. It can be used as an evaluation tool for intervention research, to inform policy-making and future health education interventions of improving caregivers' health literacy.

摘要

照料者的健康素养在育儿质量中起着至关重要的作用,对儿童的身心健康有着重大影响。然而,目前缺乏评估 0 至 3 岁儿童照料者健康素养的工具。本研究旨在评估中文版父母健康素养问卷(CPHLQ)在中国的信度和效度。我们进行了一项横断面研究。2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 1 月期间,从中国东部的山东省、中部的云南省和西部的陕西省招募了 634 名 0 至 3 岁儿童的照料者。内部一致性信度和半分信度评估了信度,验证性因子分析评估了结构效度。采用多元线性回归模型评估了父母健康素养的社会决定因素。结果表明,CPHLQ 具有良好的信度和可接受的结构效度。与其他类型的照料者相比,母亲、较高的受教育程度、核心或扩展家庭与较高的父母健康素养显著相关。研究进一步表明,CPHLQ 是一种可靠和有效的工具,可用于测量中国 0 至 3 岁儿童照料者的健康素养。它可以作为干预研究的评估工具,为提高照料者健康素养的政策制定和未来健康教育干预提供信息。