• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发并验证了一份针对 0 至 3 岁儿童照护者的中文家长健康素养问卷。

Development and validation of a Chinese parental health literacy questionnaire for caregivers of children 0 to 3 years old.

机构信息

Department of Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health; Global Health Institute, Fudan University, Mailbox 175, No. 138 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.

Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1670-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12887-019-1670-9
PMID:31438889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6704698/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Given the limited information on parental health literacy measurements, the study aimed to develop and validate the Chinese Parental Health Literacy Questionnaire for caregivers of children 0 to 3 years old.

METHODS

We conducted a validity and reliability study of the questionnaire through a cross-sectional survey and test-retest analysis respectively between March and April 2017. We recruited 807 caregivers of children 0 to 3 years old, among them 101 caregivers completed the test-retest assessment with 2 weeks interval. The reliability was determined by internal consistency, spilt-half reliability and test-retest reliability. The construct validity was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis.

RESULTS

The 39-question Chinese Parental Health Literacy Questionnaire was demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.89), spilt-half reliability (Spearman-Brown coefficient = 0.92) and test-retest reliability (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.82). The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the construct of the questionnaire fitted well with the hypothetical model. The participants' test scores of the Chinese Parental Health Literacy Questionnaire in the cross-sectional survey were positively associated with caregivers being mothers, more educated, the children with Shanghai Hukou, having only one child in the family, and higher family income.

CONCLUSION

The Chinese Parental Health Literacy Questionnaire demonstrated good reliability and validity, which could potentially be used as an effective evaluation instrument to assess parental health literacy.

摘要

背景

鉴于父母健康素养测量的信息有限,本研究旨在开发和验证适用于 0 至 3 岁儿童照顾者的中文父母健康素养问卷。

方法

我们通过横断面调查和测试-重测分析分别于 2017 年 3 月至 4 月进行了问卷的有效性和可靠性研究。我们招募了 807 名 0 至 3 岁儿童的照顾者,其中 101 名照顾者在 2 周间隔内完成了重测评估。内部一致性、分半信度和重测信度用于确定可靠性。验证性因子分析用于评估结构效度。

结果

39 题中文父母健康素养问卷表现出较高的内部一致性(Cronbach's α=0.89)、分半信度(Spearman-Brown 系数=0.92)和重测信度(Pearson 相关系数=0.82)。验证性因子分析表明问卷的结构与假设模型拟合良好。横断面调查中,参与者的中文父母健康素养问卷测试分数与照顾者为母亲、受教育程度较高、孩子有上海户口、家庭中只有一个孩子以及家庭收入较高呈正相关。

结论

中文父母健康素养问卷具有良好的信度和效度,可作为评估父母健康素养的有效评价工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78cc/6704698/308995586565/12887_2019_1670_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78cc/6704698/308995586565/12887_2019_1670_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78cc/6704698/308995586565/12887_2019_1670_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a Chinese parental health literacy questionnaire for caregivers of children 0 to 3 years old.开发并验证了一份针对 0 至 3 岁儿童照护者的中文家长健康素养问卷。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1670-9.
2
Development and validation of the reproductive health literacy questionnaire for Chinese unmarried youth.中文未婚青年生殖健康素养问卷的编制及信效度检验
Reprod Health. 2021 Nov 13;18(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01278-6.
3
Validity and Reliability of the Parental Health Literacy Questionnaire for Caregivers of Children Aged 0 to 3 Years in China.中国 0-3 岁儿童照护者健康素养问卷的信度和效度研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 1;19(23):16076. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316076.
4
Development and validation of a food and nutrition literacy questionnaire for Chinese school-age children.开发和验证中文版学龄儿童食物与营养素养问卷。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 6;16(1):e0244197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244197. eCollection 2021.
5
[Evaluation of reliability and validity of Chinese version of a short-form of Health Literacy Dental scale (HeLD-14) in the application among parents of preschool children].中文版简化健康素养牙科量表(HeLD-14)在学龄前儿童家长中应用的信效度评价
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Oct 18;56(5):828-832. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.05.012.
6
Development and validation of the family management scale for children with asthma (FMSCA).儿童哮喘家庭管理量表(FMSCA)的编制与验证
J Asthma. 2020 Apr;57(4):441-451. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1571085. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
7
Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) questionnaire translated into Malagasy.评估翻译成马尔加什语的《幼儿口腔健康影响量表》(ECOHIS)问卷的信度和效度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Feb 24;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01296-1.
8
Improving Parental Health Literacy in Primary Caregivers of 0- to 3-Year-Old Children Through a WeChat Official Account: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.通过微信公众号提高 0-3 岁儿童主要照顾者的家长健康素养:整群随机对照试验。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jul 4;10:e54623. doi: 10.2196/54623.
9
Parental understanding of infant health information: health literacy, numeracy, and the Parental Health Literacy Activities Test (PHLAT).家长对婴儿健康信息的理解:健康素养、计算能力和父母健康素养活动测试(PHLAT)。
Acad Pediatr. 2010 Sep-Oct;10(5):309-16. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.06.007. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
10
A new comprehensive diabetes health literacy scale: Development and psychometric evaluation.一个新的综合性糖尿病健康素养量表:编制与心理测量学评估。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Dec;88:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and psychometric validation of a novel health literacy scale for family caregivers of preschool children.一种针对学龄前儿童家庭照顾者的新型健康素养量表的开发与心理测量学验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Mar 1;23(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02349-z.
2
Development and validation of a questionnaire on parental health literacy in the context of promoting healthy lifestyles during childhood: a study protocol.儿童期促进健康生活方式背景下父母健康素养问卷的编制与验证:一项研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 12;15(2):e088037. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088037.
3
Improving Parental Health Literacy in Primary Caregivers of 0- to 3-Year-Old Children Through a WeChat Official Account: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Parents' Comprehensive Health Literacy on BMI in Children: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study in Japan.父母综合健康素养对儿童 BMI 的影响:日本多中心横断面研究。
J Sch Health. 2018 Dec;88(12):910-916. doi: 10.1111/josh.12700.
2
Measuring health literacy in Asia: Validation of the HLS-EU-Q47 survey tool in six Asian countries.在亚洲测量健康素养:HLS-EU-Q47调查工具在六个亚洲国家的验证
J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;27(2):80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.je.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
3
Nurturing care: promoting early childhood development.
通过微信公众号提高 0-3 岁儿童主要照顾者的家长健康素养:整群随机对照试验。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jul 4;10:e54623. doi: 10.2196/54623.
4
Community-based intervention WeChat official account to improve parental health literacy among primary caregivers of children aged 0 to 3 years: Protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.基于社区的干预 微信公众号提高 0 至 3 岁儿童主要照顾者的健康素养:一项整群随机对照试验方案。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 6;10:1039394. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1039394. eCollection 2022.
5
Validity and Reliability of the Parental Health Literacy Questionnaire for Caregivers of Children Aged 0 to 3 Years in China.中国 0-3 岁儿童照护者健康素养问卷的信度和效度研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 1;19(23):16076. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316076.
6
Questionnaire and LGBM Model for Assessing Health Literacy levels of Mongolians in China.中国蒙古族健康素养评估的问卷和 LGBM 模型。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 5;22(1):2027. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14392-2.
7
The Parent Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ-Parent). Adaptation and validity testing with parents of children with epilepsy.家长健康素养问卷(HLQ-Parent)。对癫痫患儿家长进行的改编及效度测试。
Scand J Public Health. 2024 Feb;52(1):39-47. doi: 10.1177/14034948221123436. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
8
Measuring health literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of instruments from 1993 to 2021.测量健康素养:1993 年至 2021 年工具的系统评价和文献计量分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 15;17(7):e0271524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271524. eCollection 2022.
9
Development and validation of the reproductive health literacy questionnaire for Chinese unmarried youth.中文未婚青年生殖健康素养问卷的编制及信效度检验
Reprod Health. 2021 Nov 13;18(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01278-6.
养育关怀:促进儿童早期发展。
Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):91-102. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31390-3. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
4
Health Literacy and Women's Reproductive Health: A Systematic Review.健康素养与女性生殖健康:一项系统综述。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016 Dec;25(12):1237-1255. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.5810. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
5
Development and Validation of Chinese Health Literacy Scale for Low Salt Consumption-Hong Kong Population (CHLSalt-HK).《香港人群低钠饮食健康素养量表(CHLSalt-HK)的编制与验证》
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0132303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132303. eCollection 2015.
6
Fathers and Asthma Care: Paternal Involvement, Beliefs, and Management Skills.父亲与哮喘护理:父亲的参与、观念及管理技能
J Pediatr Psychol. 2015 Sep;40(8):768-80. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsv035. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
7
Health literacy and parent attitudes about weight control for children.健康素养与家长对儿童体重控制的态度。
Appetite. 2015 Aug;91:200-8. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
8
The Impact of Parent's Health Literacy on Pediatric Asthma Outcomes.父母健康素养对儿童哮喘结局的影响。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. 2015 Mar 1;28(1):20-26. doi: 10.1089/ped.2014.0379.
9
Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU).欧洲的健康素养:欧洲健康素养调查(HLS-EU)的比较结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Dec;25(6):1053-8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv043. Epub 2015 Apr 5.
10
Sample size used to validate a scale: a review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures.用于验证量表的样本量:对新开发的患者报告结局指标相关出版物的综述
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Dec 9;12:176. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0176-2.