University of Manchester, School of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, Jean Macfarlane Building, University Place Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
University of Manchester, School of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, Jean Macfarlane Building, University Place Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Oct;71(7):1308-1315. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.06.031. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
Remote psychotherapy services such as telephone-administered cognitive behavioural therapy (T-CBT) have the potential to provide effective psychological treatment whilst simultaneously maximising efficiency, lowering costs and improving access to care. However, a lack of research examining the acceptability of non face-to-face psychotherapy means that little is known about users' perceptions of these delivery models. This paper reports data from two qualitative evaluations of T-CBT delivered in the voluntary and occupational health sectors in the UK. It explores users' acceptance of T-CBT, contrasting initial socially-construed expectations with more positive regard derived from experiential norms. User satisfaction with T-CBT was mixed. However, the relative ease with which most participants adapted to telephone-based care was suggestive of a shared construct of mental health service provision that prioritised the accessibility and availability of services over the social, professional and medico-legal perspectives that conventionally promote the co-location of practitioner and client.
远程心理治疗服务,如电话实施的认知行为疗法(T-CBT),具有提供有效心理治疗的潜力,同时最大限度地提高效率、降低成本并改善护理的可及性。然而,由于缺乏对非面对面心理治疗可接受性的研究,因此对于用户对这些交付模式的看法知之甚少。本文报告了两项在英国志愿和职业健康部门进行的 T-CBT 定性评估的数据。它探讨了用户对 T-CBT 的接受程度,将最初的社会建构的期望与从经验规范中得出的更积极的看法进行对比。用户对 T-CBT 的满意度喜忧参半。然而,大多数参与者相对容易适应基于电话的护理,这表明存在一种共同的心理健康服务提供理念,该理念优先考虑服务的可及性和可用性,而不是传统上促进从业者和客户同地办公的社会、专业和医疗法律观点。