• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开胸术后等速肌力:标准后外侧开胸术与保留肌肉后外侧开胸术的比较

Isokinetic muscle strength after thoracotomy: standard vs. muscle-sparing posterolateral thoracotomy.

作者信息

Ziyade S, Baskent A, Tanju S, Toker A, Dilege S

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul Universty Istanbul Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Aug;58(5):295-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1249829. Epub 2010 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1055/s-0030-1249829
PMID:20680907
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare the effects of conventional posterolateral thoracotomy and muscle-sparing posterolateral thoracotomy on pulmonary and muscle strength.

METHODS

From January 2003 to December 2004, 50 randomized patients with a diagnosis of primary lung cancer underwent pulmonary resection. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I (n=25) underwent conventional posterolateral thoracotomy, while Group II (n=25) had muscle-sparing thoracotomy. The groups were compared in terms of shoulder abduction/adduction isokinetic muscle strength and respiratory muscle strength.

RESULTS

A comparison of maximal expiratory pressure and maximal inspiratory pressure preoperatively and postoperatively and of maximal expiratory pressure and maximal inspiratory pressure preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively showed statistically significant differences (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

For the preservation of muscle strength, especially in patients whose jobs involved manual work, muscle-sparing posterolateral thoracotomy should be the first choice rather than conventional thoracotomy. Moreover, if necessary, the latissimus dorsi muscle can be used more extensively as a flap after muscle-sparing posterolateral thoracotomy procedures.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是比较传统后外侧开胸术和保留肌肉后外侧开胸术对肺功能和肌肉力量的影响。

方法

2003年1月至2004年12月,50例确诊为原发性肺癌的患者接受了肺切除术。患者被分为两组:第一组(n=25)接受传统后外侧开胸术,而第二组(n=25)接受保留肌肉开胸术。比较两组的肩部外展/内收等速肌力和呼吸肌力。

结果

术前和术后最大呼气压力和最大吸气压力的比较,以及术前和术后3个月最大呼气压力和最大吸气压力的比较显示出统计学上的显著差异(P<0.05)。

结论

为了保留肌肉力量,特别是对于工作涉及体力劳动的患者,保留肌肉后外侧开胸术应是首选而非传统开胸术。此外,如有必要,在保留肌肉后外侧开胸术后,背阔肌可更广泛地用作皮瓣。

相似文献

1
Isokinetic muscle strength after thoracotomy: standard vs. muscle-sparing posterolateral thoracotomy.开胸术后等速肌力:标准后外侧开胸术与保留肌肉后外侧开胸术的比较
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Aug;58(5):295-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1249829. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
2
Muscle-sparing versus posterolateral thoracotomy: a prospective study.保留肌肉的开胸术与后外侧开胸术:一项前瞻性研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Mar;31(3):496-9; discussion 499-500. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.12.012. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
3
[Effect of thoracoscopic procedure versus standard posterolateral/muscle-sparing thoracotomy on pulmonary lung function].
Kyobu Geka. 1997 May;50(5):368-72.
4
Muscle sparing versus posterolateral thoracotomy for pulmonary lobectomy: randomised controlled trial.肺叶切除术中肌肉保留与后外侧开胸手术的对比:随机对照试验
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Oct;11(4):415-9. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.238840. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
5
Shoulder-girdle strength after standard and lateral muscle-sparing thoracotomy.标准开胸术和保留胸壁外侧肌肉开胸术后的肩胛带肌力
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 Apr;49(2):112-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-11702.
6
Acute and chronic morbidity differences between muscle-sparing and standard lateral thoracotomies.保留肌肉的开胸术与标准侧胸开胸术之间急慢性发病率的差异
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996 Nov;112(5):1346-50; discussion 1350-1. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70150-2.
7
[Minimally invasive thoracotomy for the lung resection; without thoracoscopic procedure].用于肺切除的微创开胸手术;无需胸腔镜手术
Kyobu Geka. 2006 Jul;59(8 Suppl):714-7.
8
In elderly patients with lung cancer is resection justified in terms of morbidity, mortality and residual quality of life?就发病率、死亡率和剩余生活质量而言,老年肺癌患者进行手术切除是否合理?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Jun;10(6):1015-21. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.233189. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
9
Evaluation of respiratory muscle strength by randomized controlled trial comparing thoracoscopy, transaxillary thoracotomy, and posterolateral thoracotomy for lung biopsy.通过随机对照试验比较胸腔镜检查、经腋窝开胸术和后外侧开胸术进行肺活检时呼吸肌力量的评估。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Apr;29(4):596-600. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.12.041. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
10
Pulmonary segmentectomy by thoracotomy or thoracoscopy: reduced hospital length of stay with a minimally-invasive approach.开胸或胸腔镜下肺段切除术:微创方法可缩短住院时间。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Oct;84(4):1107-12; discussion 1112-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.05.013.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of lung surgery, with or without (neo-)adjuvant therapy, on physical functioning in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer: a scoping review.肺手术(无论有无(新)辅助治疗)对非小细胞肺癌患者身体功能的影响:一项范围综述
Eur Respir Rev. 2025 Feb 19;34(175). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0156-2024. Print 2025 Jan.
2
Muscle-Sparing Skin Crease Incision Posterolateral Thoracotomies in Pediatric Patients: Our Experience.小儿患者的保留肌肉皮肤皱襞切口后外侧开胸术:我们的经验
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2022 May-Jun;27(3):309-316. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_43_21. Epub 2022 May 12.
3
Traditional chest drainage versus drainage by thoracotomy: a prospective randomized study.
传统胸腔闭式引流术与开胸引流术的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2019 Oct 10;18:eAO4409. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO4409. eCollection 2020.
4
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.电视辅助胸腔镜手术与保留肌肉的开胸手术治疗非小细胞肺癌的系统评价和Meta分析
BMC Surg. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0618-1.
5
Decrease in pulmonary function and oxygenation after lung resection.肺切除术后肺功能和氧合作用下降。
ERJ Open Res. 2018 Jan 19;4(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00055-2017. eCollection 2018 Jan.
6
Does muscle-sparing thoracotomy as opposed to posterolateral thoracotomy result in better recovery?与后外侧开胸手术相比,保留肌肉的开胸手术是否能带来更好的恢复效果?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Jan;16(1):60-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs295. Epub 2012 Oct 9.