• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与后外侧开胸手术相比,保留肌肉的开胸手术是否能带来更好的恢复效果?

Does muscle-sparing thoracotomy as opposed to posterolateral thoracotomy result in better recovery?

作者信息

Elshiekh Mohamed A F, Lo Tammy T H, Shipolini Alex R, McCormack David J

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Suez Canal University Hospital, Ismailia, Egypt.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Jan;16(1):60-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs295. Epub 2012 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivs295
PMID:23049082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3523615/
Abstract

A best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether muscle-sparing thoracotomy (MST), as opposed to posterolateral thoracotomy (PLT), results in better recovery. A total of 108 papers were found using the reported searches of which eight represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, date, journal, study type, population, main outcome measures and results are tabulated. A recent large prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study demonstrated a shorter length of stay in patients undergoing MST. It failed to demonstrate any significant difference in pain reported or pulmonary function. A separate prospective randomized controlled trial focussed on pain, pulmonary function, late shoulder range of motion and late muscle strength. It failed to show any significant difference in these domains between PLT and MST. While the mean 'opening time' is greater when performing a MST, this is negated by a shorter mean 'closing time' when compared with PLT. Overall, the evidence suggests that MST results in greater early (1 week) preservation of skeletal muscle strength and range of motion over PLT. This difference has disappeared at 1 month. There is little evidence to suggest a difference in pulmonary function or pain dependent on the thoracotomy type. Moreover, analgesic consumption is similar. However, there is an inverse relationship between the incision length and the post-thoracotomy syndrome.

摘要

根据结构化方案撰写了一个最佳证据主题。所探讨的问题是,与后外侧开胸术(PLT)相比,保留肌肉开胸术(MST)是否能带来更好的恢复效果。通过报告的检索共找到108篇论文,其中8篇代表了回答该临床问题的最佳证据。现将作者、日期、期刊、研究类型、人群、主要结局指标和结果制成表格列出。最近一项大型前瞻性、随机、双盲对照研究表明,接受MST的患者住院时间更短。但该研究未能证明在疼痛报告或肺功能方面存在任何显著差异。另一项前瞻性随机对照试验聚焦于疼痛、肺功能、后期肩部活动范围和后期肌肉力量。该试验未能显示PLT和MST在这些方面存在任何显著差异。虽然进行MST时平均“打开时间”更长,但与PLT相比,其平均“关闭时间”更短,从而抵消了这一差异。总体而言,证据表明,与PLT相比,MST能在早期(1周)更好地保留骨骼肌力量和活动范围。这种差异在1个月时消失。几乎没有证据表明肺功能或疼痛因开胸术类型而异。此外,镇痛药物的消耗量相似。然而,切口长度与开胸术后综合征之间存在反比关系。

相似文献

1
Does muscle-sparing thoracotomy as opposed to posterolateral thoracotomy result in better recovery?与后外侧开胸手术相比,保留肌肉的开胸手术是否能带来更好的恢复效果?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Jan;16(1):60-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs295. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
2
Muscle-sparing versus posterolateral thoracotomy: a prospective study.保留肌肉的开胸术与后外侧开胸术:一项前瞻性研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Mar;31(3):496-9; discussion 499-500. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.12.012. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
3
Muscle sparing versus posterolateral thoracotomy for pulmonary lobectomy: randomised controlled trial.肺叶切除术中肌肉保留与后外侧开胸手术的对比:随机对照试验
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Oct;11(4):415-9. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.238840. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
4
Is transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effective in relieving postoperative pain after thoracotomy?经皮电刺激神经疗法对缓解开胸术后疼痛有效吗?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Feb;10(2):283-8. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.219576. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
5
The effect of muscle-sparing versus standard posterolateral thoracotomy on pulmonary function, muscle strength, and postoperative pain.保留肌肉的后外侧开胸术与标准后外侧开胸术对肺功能、肌肉力量和术后疼痛的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991 Mar;101(3):394-400; discussion 400-1. doi: 10.1097/00132586-199204000-00044.
6
Are intracostal sutures better than pericostal sutures for closing a thoracotomy?肋间缝合在关闭开胸切口方面是否优于肋周缝合?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Jun;14(6):807-15. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs096. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
7
Muscle sparing thoracotomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison with posterolateral thoracotomy.食管癌的保留肌肉开胸术:与后外侧开胸术的比较
Surg Today. 2016 Jul;46(7):807-14. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1240-1. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
8
Muscle sparing thoracotomy: a biomechanical analysis confirms preservation of muscle strength but no improvement in wound discomfort.保留肌肉的开胸手术:生物力学分析证实肌肉力量得以保留,但伤口不适并无改善。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000 Dec;18(6):656-61. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00591-1.
9
Anterior muscle and neurovascular-sparing thoracotomy and posterolateral thoracotomy: postoperative pain and morbidity assessment.保留前肌及神经血管的开胸术与后外侧开胸术:术后疼痛及发病率评估
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jun;62(4):353-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1370364. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
10
The effect of standard posterolateral versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy on multiple parameters.标准后外侧开胸术与保留肌肉开胸术对多个参数的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Oct;76(4):1050-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00565-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term, Health-Related Quality of Life after Open and Robot-Assisted Ivor-Lewis Procedures-A Propensity Score-Matched Study.开放手术与机器人辅助艾佛-刘易斯手术后与健康相关的长期生活质量——一项倾向评分匹配研究
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 30;9(11):3513. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113513.
2
Ultimate management of post thoracotomy morbidities: a set of surgical technique and peri-operative precautions.开胸术后并发症的最终处理:一套手术技术及围手术期预防措施
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Mar;11(Suppl 3):S370-S375. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.12.45.
3
Risk factors of neuropathic pain after thoracic surgery.胸外科手术后神经性疼痛的危险因素。
J Thorac Dis. 2018 May;10(5):2898-2907. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.25.
4
Multidisciplinary Oncoplastic Approach Reduces Infection in Chest Wall Resection and Reconstruction for Malignant Chest Wall Tumors.多学科肿瘤整形方法可降低恶性胸壁肿瘤胸壁切除与重建术后的感染率。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jul 20;4(7):e809. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000751. eCollection 2016 Jul.
5
Bilateral Shoulder Dysfunction Related to the Lung Resection Area After Thoracotomy.开胸肺切除术后与肺切除区域相关的双侧肩部功能障碍
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Nov;94(44):e1927. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001927.
6
From open to single port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: a stepwise and return progression of the experience from Department of Thoracic Surgery, General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command of P.L.A.从开放手术到单孔电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术:广州军区广州总医院胸外科经验的逐步演进与回归进程
J Thorac Dis. 2015 Jul;7(7):1252-63. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.06.12.
7
Quality of Life and Late Complications After Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Esophagectomy: Results of a Randomized Trial.与开放食管切除术相比,微创食管切除术后的生活质量和晚期并发症:一项随机试验的结果。
World J Surg. 2015 Aug;39(8):1986-93. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3100-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Isokinetic muscle strength after thoracotomy: standard vs. muscle-sparing posterolateral thoracotomy.开胸术后等速肌力:标准后外侧开胸术与保留肌肉后外侧开胸术的比较
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Aug;58(5):295-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1249829. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
2
Muscle sparing versus posterolateral thoracotomy for pulmonary lobectomy: randomised controlled trial.肺叶切除术中肌肉保留与后外侧开胸手术的对比:随机对照试验
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Oct;11(4):415-9. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.238840. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
3
Towards evidence-based medicine in cardiothoracic surgery: best BETS.胸心外科迈向循证医学:最佳循证医学资源与工具
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2003 Dec;2(4):405-9. doi: 10.1016/S1569-9293(03)00191-9.
4
Muscle-sparing versus posterolateral thoracotomy: a prospective study.保留肌肉的开胸术与后外侧开胸术:一项前瞻性研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Mar;31(3):496-9; discussion 499-500. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.12.012. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
5
Pain and physical function are similar following axillary, muscle-sparing vs posterolateral thoracotomy.腋下保留肌肉开胸术与后外侧开胸术后的疼痛和身体功能相似。
Chest. 2005 Oct;128(4):2664-70. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.4.2664.
6
The effect of standard posterolateral versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy on multiple parameters.标准后外侧开胸术与保留肌肉开胸术对多个参数的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Oct;76(4):1050-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00565-4.
7
Muscle sparing thoracotomy: a biomechanical analysis confirms preservation of muscle strength but no improvement in wound discomfort.保留肌肉的开胸手术:生物力学分析证实肌肉力量得以保留,但伤口不适并无改善。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000 Dec;18(6):656-61. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00591-1.
8
Neurophysiologic assessment of nerve impairment in posterolateral and muscle-sparing thoracotomy.后外侧和保留肌肉开胸手术中神经损伤的神经生理学评估
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998 Apr;115(4):841-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(98)70365-4.
9
Disadvantages of muscle-sparing thoracotomy in patients with lung cancer.肺癌患者采用保留肌肉开胸术的缺点。
World J Surg. 1996 Jun;20(5):551-5. doi: 10.1007/s002689900085.