• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职业与吸烟的混杂因素:其程度及后果。

Confounding of occupation and smoking: its magnitude and consequences.

作者信息

Smith G D, Shipley M J

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, U.K.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(11):1297-300. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90046-f.

DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(91)90046-f
PMID:2068613
Abstract

In a recent contribution to this journal, Sterling and Weinkam discuss the importance of the confounding of occupation and smoking when considering the contribution of smoking to mortality risk. In this report we provide estimates of the potential magnitude of this effect using data from a cohort study. It is shown that failing to consider possible confounding by socio-economic factors can lead to over-estimating of the strength of the relationship between smoking and mortality. The implications of these findings for the interpretation of results derived from observational studies are discussed.

摘要

在近期发表于本期刊的一篇文章中,斯特林和温卡姆讨论了在考虑吸烟对死亡风险的影响时,职业与吸烟混淆因素的重要性。在本报告中,我们使用一项队列研究的数据对这种影响的潜在程度进行了估计。结果表明,未能考虑社会经济因素可能存在的混杂作用会导致高估吸烟与死亡率之间关系的强度。本文还讨论了这些发现对解释观察性研究结果的意义。

相似文献

1
Confounding of occupation and smoking: its magnitude and consequences.职业与吸烟的混杂因素:其程度及后果。
Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(11):1297-300. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90046-f.
2
The contribution of smoking to socioeconomic differentials in mortality: results from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study, Australia.吸烟对死亡率社会经济差异的影响:澳大利亚墨尔本协作队列研究结果
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Dec;60(12):1077-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.042572.
3
Confounding by socioeconomic position remains after adjusting for neighbourhood deprivation: an example using smoking and mortality.在对邻里贫困进行调整后,社会经济地位造成的混杂因素依然存在:以吸烟与死亡率为例。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Dec;58(12):1030-1. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.019737.
4
From bad to worse: collider stratification amplifies confounding bias in the "obesity paradox".从坏到更坏:碰撞分层放大了“肥胖悖论”中的混杂偏差。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2015 Oct;30(10):1111-4. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0069-7. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
5
The confounding of occupation and smoking and its consequences.职业与吸烟的混杂因素及其后果。
Soc Sci Med. 1990;30(4):457-67. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90348-v.
6
Mortality from lung cancer and other diseases related to smoking among fishermen in north east Italy.意大利东北部渔民中肺癌及其他与吸烟相关疾病的死亡率。
Occup Environ Med. 1995 Mar;52(3):150-3. doi: 10.1136/oem.52.3.150.
7
Occupation and smoking adjusted mortality due to asthma among Swedish men.瑞典男性因哮喘导致的职业和吸烟调整死亡率。
Br J Ind Med. 1991 May;48(5):323-6.
8
Cause-specific mortality by occupational skill level in Canada: a 16-year follow-up study.加拿大按职业技能水平划分的特定病因死亡率:一项16年的随访研究。
Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2013 Sep;33(4):195-203.
9
Smoking vs other risk factors as the cause of smoking-attributable deaths: confounding in the courtroom.吸烟与其他风险因素作为吸烟所致死亡原因:法庭上的混杂因素
JAMA. 2000 Aug 9;284(6):706-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.6.706.
10
Summaries for patients. The relationship of smoking behavior and death in persons 40 to 70 years of age.患者摘要。40至70岁人群吸烟行为与死亡的关系。
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Mar 21;144(6):I12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-6-200603210-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Relation between overweight/obesity and self-rated health among adolescents in Germany. Do socio-economic status and type of school have an impact on that relation?德国青少年中超重/肥胖与自评健康之间的关系。社会经济地位和学校类型对这种关系有影响吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Feb 16;12(2):2262-76. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120202262.
2
Being poor and coping with stress: health behaviors and the risk of death.贫困与应对压力:健康行为与死亡风险
Am J Public Health. 2008 May;98(5):889-96. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.114454. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
3
Socioeconomic position, co-occurrence of behavior-related risk factors, and coronary heart disease: the Finnish Public Sector study.
社会经济地位、与行为相关的风险因素的共现情况与冠心病:芬兰公共部门研究
Am J Public Health. 2007 May;97(5):874-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.078691. Epub 2007 Mar 29.
4
Life-course socioeconomic and behavioral influences on cardiovascular disease mortality: the collaborative study.生命历程中的社会经济和行为因素对心血管疾病死亡率的影响:合作研究
Am J Public Health. 2002 Aug;92(8):1295-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.8.1295.
5
Injustices in the healthcare system: are the wealthier healthier?医疗保健系统中的不公平现象:较富裕的人是否更健康?
Pharmacoeconomics. 1992 Oct;2(4):261-6. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199202040-00001.
6
Life expectancy in men who have never smoked and those who have smoked continuously: 15 year follow up of large cohort of middle aged British men.从不吸烟男性与持续吸烟者的预期寿命:对一大群英国中年男性进行的15年随访
BMJ. 1996 Oct 12;313(7062):907-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7062.907.
7
Smoking and other health related behaviour in the social and environmental context.社会和环境背景下的吸烟及其他与健康相关的行为
Arch Dis Child. 1996 Feb;74(2):176-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.74.2.176.
8
Smoking behaviour can be predicted by neighbourhood deprivation measures.吸烟行为可通过邻里贫困程度指标进行预测。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Dec;49 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S72-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.suppl_2.s72.
9
Social class, health behaviour, and mortality among men and women in eastern Finland.芬兰东部男性和女性的社会阶层、健康行为与死亡率
BMJ. 1995 Sep 2;311(7005):589-93. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7005.589.
10
Socioeconomic differences in mortality in Britain and the United States.英国和美国死亡率方面的社会经济差异。
Am J Public Health. 1992 Aug;82(8):1079-81. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.8.1079.