Suppr超能文献

促红细胞生成素刺激剂对缺血性视网膜病变小鼠模型血管生成的差异调节。

Differential modulation of angiogenesis by erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in a mouse model of ischaemic retinopathy.

机构信息

Centre for Vision and Vascular Science, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2010 Jul 29;5(7):e11870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011870.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) are widely used to treat anaemia but concerns exist about their potential to promote pathological angiogenesis in some clinical scenarios. In the current study we have assessed the angiogenic potential of three ESAs; epoetin delta, darbepoetin alfa and epoetin beta using in vitro and in vivo models.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The epoetins induced angiogenesis in human microvascular endothelial cells at high doses, although darbepoetin alfa was pro-angiogenic at low-doses (1-20 IU/ml). ESA-induced angiogenesis was VEGF-mediated. In a mouse model of ischaemia-induced retinopathy, all ESAs induced generation of reticulocytes but only epoetin beta exacerbated pathological (pre-retinal) neovascularisation in comparison to controls (p<0.05). Only epoetin delta induced a significant revascularisation response which enhanced normality of the vasculature (p<0.05). This was associated with mobilisation of haematopoietic stem cells and their localisation to the retinal vasculature. Darbepoetin alfa also increased the number of active microglia in the ischaemic retina relative to other ESAs (p<0.05). Darbepoetin alfa induced retinal TNFalpha and VEGF mRNA expression which were up to 4 fold higher than with epoetin delta (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study has implications for treatment of patients as there are clear differences in the angiogenic potential of the different ESAs.

摘要

背景

促红细胞生成素刺激剂(ESAs)被广泛用于治疗贫血,但在某些临床情况下,它们可能促进病理性血管生成,这引起了人们的关注。在目前的研究中,我们使用体外和体内模型评估了三种 ESA;促红素 δ、达贝泊汀 α 和促红素 β 的血管生成潜力。

方法/主要发现:高剂量的促红素可诱导人微血管内皮细胞血管生成,而达贝泊汀 α 在低剂量(1-20IU/ml)时具有促血管生成作用。ESA 诱导的血管生成是由 VEGF 介导的。在缺血性视网膜病变的小鼠模型中,所有 ESA 均诱导网织红细胞生成,但与对照组相比,仅促红素 β 加剧了病理性(视网膜前)新生血管形成(p<0.05)。只有促红素 δ 诱导了显著的再血管化反应,增强了血管的正常化(p<0.05)。这与造血干细胞的动员及其向视网膜血管的定位有关。与其他 ESA 相比,达贝泊汀 α 还增加了缺血性视网膜中活性小胶质细胞的数量(p<0.05)。达贝泊汀 α 诱导视网膜 TNFalpha 和 VEGF mRNA 表达,其水平比促红素 δ 高 4 倍以上(p<0.001)。

结论

这项研究对患者的治疗具有重要意义,因为不同的 ESA 在血管生成潜力方面存在明显差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ee8/2912370/59209c9c0817/pone.0011870.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验