McGuinness Bernadette, O'Hare John, Craig David, Bullock Roger, Malouf Reem, Passmore Peter
Department of Geriatric Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Whitla Medical Building, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, UK, BT9 7BL.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Aug 4(8):CD007514. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007514.pub2.
The use of statin therapy in established Alzheimer's disease (AD) or vascular dementia (VaD) is a relatively unexplored area. In AD ss-amyloid protein (Ass) is deposited in the form of extracellular plaques and previous studies have determined Ass generation is cholesterol dependent. Hypercholesterolaemia has also been implicated in the pathogenesis of VaD. Due to the role of statins in cholesterol reduction it is biologically plausible they may be efficacious in the treatment of AD and dementia.
To assess the clinical efficacy and tolerability of statins in the treatment of dementia.
We searched the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and LILACS, as well as many trials registries and grey literature sources (27 October 2008).
Double-blind, randomized controlled trials of statins given for at least six months in people with a diagnosis of dementia.
Two independent authors extracted and assessed data independently against the inclusion criteria. Data were pooled where appropriate and entered into a meta-analysis.
Three studies were identified (748 participants, age range 50-90 years). All patients had a diagnosis of probable or possible AD according to standard criteria and most patients were established on a cholinesterase inhibitor. Treatment in ADCLT 2005 consisted of 80mg atorvastatin compared to placebo for 52 weeks, serum low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was reduced by 54% in the atorvastatin group. Treatment in Simons 2002 consisted of 40mg simvastatin compared to placebo for 26 weeks, serum LDL cholesterol was reduced by 52% in the simvastatin group. Treatment in LEADe 2010 consisted of 80mg atorvastatin compared to placebo for 72 weeks, LDL cholesterol was reduced by 50.2% by month 3 and remained constant through month 18. Change in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale- cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) from baseline was a primary outcome in 3 studies; when data were pooled there was considerable heterogeneity so the random effects model was used, statins did not provide any beneficial effect in this cognitive measure [mean difference -1.12, 95% CI -3.99, 1.75, p = 0.44]. All studies provided change in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) from baseline; again random effects model was used due to considerable heterogeneity: there was no significant benefit from statins in this cognitive measure when the data were pooled [mean difference -1.53, 95% CI -3.28, 0.21, p = 0.08]. There was some evidence that patients on statins in ADCLT 2005 maintained better cognitive function if serum cholesterol was high at baseline, MMSE was higher at baseline or if they had an apolipoprotein E4 allele present. This would need to be confirmed in larger studies however. Treatment related adverse effects were available from two studies, LEADe 2010 and Simons 2002; when data were pooled there was no significant difference between statins and placebo [odds ratio 2.45, 95% CI 0.69, 8.62, p = 0.16]. There was no significant difference in global function, behaviour or activities of daily living in the statin and placebo groups. One large randomised controlled trial (RCT) ( CLASP 2008) has not yet published its results. There were no studies identified assessing role of statins in treatment of VaD. There was no evidence that statins were detrimental to cognition.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to recommend statins for the treatment of dementia. Analysis from the studies available, including one large RCT, indicate statins have no benefit on the outcome measures ADAS-Cog or MMSE. We need to await full results from CLASP 2008 before we can be certain. This Cochrane review will be updated as these results become available.
在已确诊的阿尔茨海默病(AD)或血管性痴呆(VaD)中使用他汀类药物治疗是一个相对未被充分探索的领域。在AD中,β-淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)以细胞外斑块的形式沉积,先前的研究已确定Aβ的产生依赖于胆固醇。高胆固醇血症也与VaD的发病机制有关。由于他汀类药物在降低胆固醇方面的作用,从生物学角度来看,它们可能对AD和痴呆的治疗有效。
评估他汀类药物治疗痴呆的临床疗效和耐受性。
我们检索了Cochrane痴呆与认知改善小组专业注册库、Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CINAHL和LILACS,以及许多试验注册库和灰色文献来源(2008年10月27日)。
针对诊断为痴呆的患者进行的至少为期六个月的他汀类药物双盲随机对照试验。
两位独立作者根据纳入标准独立提取和评估数据。在适当情况下合并数据并进行荟萃分析。
共识别出三项研究(748名参与者,年龄范围50 - 90岁)。所有患者均根据标准标准诊断为可能或疑似AD,且大多数患者已开始使用胆碱酯酶抑制剂。ADCLT 2005研究中,80mg阿托伐他汀与安慰剂相比治疗52周,阿托伐他汀组血清低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇降低了54%。Simons 2002研究中,40mg辛伐他汀与安慰剂相比治疗26周,辛伐他汀组血清LDL胆固醇降低了52%。LEADe 2010研究中,80mg阿托伐他汀与安慰剂相比治疗72周,到第3个月时LDL胆固醇降低了50.2%,并在第18个月时保持稳定。三项研究均将阿尔茨海默病评估量表 - 认知分量表(ADAS - Cog)从基线的变化作为主要结局;合并数据时存在相当大的异质性,因此使用随机效应模型,他汀类药物在该认知指标上未显示出任何有益效果[平均差异 -1.12,95%置信区间 -3.99,1.75,p = 0.