Suppr超能文献

一项系统评价随机对照试验,旨在探讨免疫调节干预对创伤患者感染、器官衰竭和死亡率的影响。

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials exploring the effect of immunomodulative interventions on infection, organ failure, and mortality in trauma patients.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, HP, G04228, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 GX Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2010;14(4):R150. doi: 10.1186/cc9218. Epub 2010 Aug 5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Following trauma, patients may suffer an overwhelming pro-inflammatory response and immune paralysis resulting in infection and multiple organ failure (MOF). Various potentially immunomodulative interventions have been tested. The objective of this study is to systematically review the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigate the effect of potentially immunomodulative interventions in comparison to a placebo or standard therapy on infection, MOF, and mortality in trauma patients.

METHODS

A computerized search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE yielded 502 studies, of which 18 unique RCTs were deemed relevant for this study. The methodological quality of these RCTs was assessed using a critical appraisal checklist for therapy articles from the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. The effects of the test interventions on infection, MOF, and mortality rates and inflammatory parameters relative to the controls were recorded.

RESULTS

In most studies, the inflammatory parameters differed significantly between the test and control groups. However, significant changes in infection, MOF, and mortality rates were only measured in studies testing immunoglobulin, IFN-γ, and glucan.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on level 1b and 2b studies, administration of immunoglobulin, IFN-γ, or glucan have shown the most promising results to improve the outcome of trauma patients.

摘要

简介

创伤后,患者可能会遭受过度的促炎反应和免疫麻痹,导致感染和多器官衰竭(MOF)。已经测试了各种潜在的免疫调节干预措施。本研究的目的是系统地回顾比较潜在免疫调节干预与安慰剂或标准治疗对创伤患者感染、MOF 和死亡率影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。

方法

通过计算机检索 MEDLINE、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库和 EMBASE,共获得 502 项研究,其中有 18 项独特的 RCT 被认为与本研究相关。使用循证医学中心的治疗文章批判性评价清单评估这些 RCT 的方法学质量。记录测试干预相对于对照组对感染、MOF 和死亡率以及炎症参数的影响。

结果

在大多数研究中,测试组和对照组的炎症参数差异显著。然而,只有在测试免疫球蛋白、IFN-γ 和葡聚糖的研究中才测量到感染、MOF 和死亡率的显著变化。

结论

基于 1b 级和 2b 级研究,给予免疫球蛋白、IFN-γ 或葡聚糖显示出最有希望改善创伤患者结局的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/904e/2945133/ad18be907281/cc9218-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验