School of Engineering and Informatics, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 Nov;109(5):1424-31. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01262.2009. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
Cerebral autoregulation adjusts cerebrovascular resistance in the face of changing perfusion pressures to maintain relatively constant flow. Results from several studies suggest that cardiac output may also play a role. We tested the hypothesis that cerebral blood flow would autoregulate independent of changes in cardiac output. Transient systemic hypotension was induced by thigh-cuff deflation in 19 healthy volunteers (7 women) in both supine and seated positions. Mean arterial pressure (Finapres), cerebral blood flow (transcranial Doppler) in the anterior (ACA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA), beat-by-beat cardiac output (echocardiography), and end-tidal Pco(2) were measured. Autoregulation was assessed using the autoregulatory index (ARI) defined by Tiecks et al. (Tiecks FP, Lam AM, Aaslid R, Newell DW. Stroke 26: 1014-1019, 1995). Cerebral autoregulation was better in the supine position in both the ACA [supine ARI: 5.0 ± 0.21 (mean ± SE), seated ARI: 3.9 ± 0.4, P = 0.01] and MCA (supine ARI: 5.0 ± 0.2, seated ARI: 3.8 ± 0.3, P = 0.004). In contrast, cardiac output responses were not different between positions and did not correlate with cerebral blood flow ARIs. In addition, women had better autoregulation in the ACA (P = 0.046), but not the MCA, despite having the same cardiac output response. These data demonstrate cardiac output does not appear to affect the dynamic cerebral autoregulatory response to sudden hypotension in healthy controls, regardless of posture. These results also highlight the importance of considering sex when studying cerebral autoregulation.
脑自动调节通过改变脑血管阻力来适应灌注压的变化,以维持相对稳定的血流。多项研究结果表明,心输出量可能也起作用。我们通过对 19 名健康志愿者(7 名女性)的股动脉袖带放气,诱发短暂的全身低血压,在仰卧位和坐位两种姿势下分别测试脑血流是否独立于心输出量的变化进行自动调节的假说。平均动脉压(Finapres)、前(ACA)和中(MCA)脑动脉的脑血流(经颅多普勒)、每搏心输出量(超声心动图)和呼气末 Pco(2)均被测量。采用 Tiecks 等定义的自动调节指数(ARI)评估自动调节(Tiecks FP、Lam AM、Aaslid R、Newell DW. Stroke 26: 1014-1019, 1995)。在仰卧位,ACA [仰卧位 ARI:5.0 ± 0.21(平均值 ± SE),坐位 ARI:3.9 ± 0.4,P = 0.01]和 MCA(仰卧位 ARI:5.0 ± 0.2,坐位 ARI:3.8 ± 0.3,P = 0.004)的脑自动调节更好。相反,体位间心输出量的反应没有差异,也与脑血流 ARI 无关。此外,女性在 ACA 的自动调节更好(P = 0.046),但 MCA 没有,尽管她们的心输出量反应相同。这些数据表明,在健康对照组中,心输出量似乎不会影响对突然低血压的动态脑自动调节反应,而与姿势无关。这些结果还强调了在研究脑自动调节时考虑性别的重要性。