• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Americans on health care reform: results from polls conducted with Zogby International, Inc.美国人对医疗保健改革的看法:与佐格比国际公司合作进行的民意调查结果
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2010;121:267-79; discussion 279-80.
2
Polling analysis: public support for health reform was broader than reported and depended on how proposals were framed.民意调查分析:公众对医改的支持比报道的更为广泛,这取决于提案的措辞。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Jul;30(7):1242-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0180.
3
The Affordable Care Act's Missing Consensus: Values, Attitudes, and Experiences Associated with Competing Health Reform Preferences.平价医疗法案的缺失共识:与竞争医疗改革偏好相关的价值观、态度和经验。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2020 Oct 1;45(5):729-755. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8543222.
4
Why do so many Americans oppose the Affordable Care Act?为什么这么多美国人反对平价医疗法案?
Am J Med. 2015 Aug;128(8):807-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.01.032. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
5
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010: reforming the health care reform for the new decade.2010 年患者保护与平价医疗法案:为新十年改革医疗改革。
Pain Physician. 2011 Jan-Feb;14(1):E35-67.
6
Americans' conflicting views about the public health system, and how to shore up support.美国人对公共卫生系统的看法存在矛盾,以及如何支持该系统。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Nov;29(11):2033-40. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0262.
7
Implementing the Affordable Care Act: The Promise and Limits of Health Care Reform.实施《平价医疗法案》:医疗保健改革的前景与局限
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2016 Aug;41(4):803-26. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3620953. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
8
Liking the pieces, not the package: contradictions in public opinion during health reform.喜欢内容,不喜欢包装:医改期间的舆论矛盾。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1125-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0434.
9
National health insurance or incremental reform: aim high, or at our feet?国家医疗保险还是渐进式改革:目标高远,还是立足当下?
Am J Public Health. 2003 Jan;93(1):102-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.1.102.
10
WHY DO AMERICANS STILL NEED SINGLE-PAYER HEALTH CARE AFTER MAJOR HEALTH REFORM?在重大医疗改革之后,为什么美国人仍然需要单一支付者医疗保健制度?
Int J Health Serv. 2015;45(1):149-60. doi: 10.2190/HS.45.1.l.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in public attitudes towards confidential adolescent sexual and reproductive health services in Lithuania after the introduction of new legislation: findings from the cross-sectional surveys conducted in 2005 and 2012.立陶宛新立法实施后公众对青少年性与生殖健康保密服务态度的变化:2005年和2012年横断面调查结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 4;15:360. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1027-5.
2
Social, Reproductive, and Attitudinal Factors Associated with U.S. Women's Disagreement with the Passage of the Affordable Care Act.与美国女性反对《平价医疗法案》通过相关的社会、生殖及态度因素
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Sep;24(9):730-9. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.5175. Epub 2015 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

1
A time for revolutions--the role of clinicians in health care reform.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 6;361(6):e8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0905707. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
2
Commitment to care for the community.
JAMA. 2009 May 13;301(18):1929-30. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.642.
3
What drives public acceptance of nanotechnology?是什么推动了公众对纳米技术的接受?
Nat Nanotechnol. 2006 Dec;1(3):153-5. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2006.155.

美国人对医疗保健改革的看法:与佐格比国际公司合作进行的民意调查结果

Americans on health care reform: results from polls conducted with Zogby International, Inc.

作者信息

Casscells S Ward, Critchley Hiliary P, Herbst-Greer Stephanie M, Kaiser Larry, Zogby John

机构信息

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

出版信息

Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2010;121:267-79; discussion 279-80.

PMID:20697567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2917127/
Abstract

During a time of uncertainty regarding the future of the American health care system, an assessment, over time, of Americans' opinion on different legislative or health policy directions is a valuable asset to decision makers. After polling over 10,000 Americans via three polls on these topics over four months, a few distinct trends have emerged. When it comes to health care reform, Americans want a "tune-up," not a "trade-in" of their health care system by implementing reforms that allow the system to work more efficiently for the largest number of people possible, paying for it through savings found by reducing extraneous and wasteful spending and by increasing the quality of care. A clear sense of equity is also evident, as a majority do not agree with insurance companies using pre-existing health conditions as a metric in determining eligibility and believe in mandating that those who are employed, except for the smallest companies, should be covered.

摘要

在美国医疗保健系统未来充满不确定性的时期,随着时间推移,评估美国人对不同立法或卫生政策方向的看法,对决策者而言是一项宝贵财富。在四个月内就这些主题通过三次民意调查对一万多名美国人进行民意测验后,出现了一些明显的趋势。在医疗保健改革方面,美国人希望进行“微调”,而非通过实施改革来“更换”他们的医疗保健系统,这些改革要让该系统尽可能为最多的人更高效地运作,并通过减少不必要和浪费性支出以及提高医疗质量所节省的资金来为此买单。公平意识也很明显,因为大多数人不同意保险公司将已有健康状况作为确定资格的衡量标准,并认为除最小的公司外,应强制要求就业人员参保。