Service d'Endocrinologie-Nutrition, Hôpital Sud, Amiens, France.
Drug Saf. 2010 Sep 1;33(9):727-40. doi: 10.2165/11536790-000000000-00000.
Lactic acidosis associated with metformin treatment is a rare but important adverse event, and unravelling the problem is critical. First, this potential event still influences treatment strategies in type 2 diabetes mellitus, particularly in the many patients at risk of kidney failure, in those presenting contraindications to metformin and in the elderly. Second, the relationship between metformin and lactic acidosis is complex, since use of the drug may be causal, co-responsible or coincidental. The present review is divided into three parts, dealing with the incidence, management and prevention of lactic acidosis occurring during metformin treatment. In terms of incidence, the objective of this article is to counter the conventional view of the link between metformin and lactic acidosis, according to which metformin-associated lactic acidosis is rare but is still associated with a high rate of mortality. In fact, the direct metformin-related mortality is close to zero and metformin may even be protective in cases of very severe lactic acidosis unrelated to the drug. Metformin has also inherited a negative class effect, since the early biguanide, phenformin, was associated with more frequent and sometimes fatal lactic acidosis. In the second part of this review, the objective is to identify the most efficient patient management methods based on our knowledge of how metformin acts on glucose/lactate metabolism and how lactic acidosis may occur (at the organ and cellular levels) during metformin treatment. The liver appears to be a key organ for both the antidiabetic effect of metformin and the development of lactic acidosis; the latter is attributed to mitochondrial impairment and subsequent adenosine triphosphate depletion, acceleration of the glycolytic flux, increased glucose uptake and the generation of lactate, which effluxes into the circulation rather than being oxidized further. Haemodialysis should systematically be performed in severe forms of lactic acidosis, since it provides both symptomatic and aetiological treatment (by eliminating lactate and metformin). In the third part of the review (prevention), the objective is to examine the list of contraindications to metformin (primarily related to renal and cardiovascular function). Diabetes is above all a vascular disease and metformin is a vascular drug with antidiabetic properties. Given the importance of the liver in lactate clearance, we suggest focusing on the severity of and prognosis for liver disease; renal dysfunction is only a prerequisite for metformin accumulation, which may only be dangerous per se when associated with liver failure. Lastly, in view of metformin's impressive overall effectiveness profile, it would be paradoxical to deny the majority of patients with long-established diabetes access to metformin because of the high prevalence of contraindications. The implications of these contraindications are discussed.
与二甲双胍治疗相关的乳酸酸中毒是一种罕见但重要的不良事件,因此揭示其问题的本质至关重要。首先,这种潜在的事件仍然会影响 2 型糖尿病的治疗策略,尤其是在那些有肾衰竭风险、对二甲双胍有禁忌或老年人的患者中。其次,二甲双胍与乳酸酸中毒之间的关系很复杂,因为药物的使用可能是因果关系、共同责任或巧合。本综述分为三个部分,分别讨论了在二甲双胍治疗过程中发生乳酸酸中毒的发生率、管理和预防。在发生率方面,本文的目的是反驳传统的二甲双胍与乳酸酸中毒之间的联系,根据这种联系,二甲双胍相关的乳酸酸中毒虽然罕见,但死亡率仍然很高。事实上,直接与二甲双胍相关的死亡率接近零,而且在与药物无关的非常严重的乳酸酸中毒情况下,二甲双胍甚至可能具有保护作用。二甲双胍也继承了一种负面的类效应,因为早期的双胍类药物苯乙双胍曾与更频繁和有时致命的乳酸酸中毒有关。在本综述的第二部分中,目的是根据我们对二甲双胍如何作用于葡萄糖/乳酸代谢以及乳酸酸中毒如何在二甲双胍治疗过程中发生(在器官和细胞水平上)的了解,确定最有效的患者管理方法。肝脏似乎是二甲双胍发挥降糖作用和发生乳酸酸中毒的关键器官;后者归因于线粒体损伤和随后的三磷酸腺苷耗竭、糖酵解通量加速、葡萄糖摄取增加以及生成的乳酸流出到循环中而不是进一步氧化。在严重的乳酸酸中毒中,应系统地进行血液透析,因为它既提供了症状治疗,也提供了病因治疗(通过消除乳酸和二甲双胍)。在综述的第三部分(预防)中,目的是检查二甲双胍的禁忌症清单(主要与肾功能和心血管功能有关)。糖尿病首先是一种血管疾病,而二甲双胍是一种具有降糖作用的血管药物。鉴于肝脏在清除乳酸中的重要性,我们建议重点关注肝脏疾病的严重程度和预后;肾功能不全仅是二甲双胍蓄积的前提,只有在合并肝功能衰竭时才会对其本身造成危险。最后,鉴于二甲双胍令人印象深刻的总体有效性概况,如果因为禁忌症的高流行率而拒绝大多数长期患有糖尿病的患者使用二甲双胍,那将是自相矛盾的。我们讨论了这些禁忌症的影响。