Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Cancer Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;35(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.07.013. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
To examine the association between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and risk of incident prostate cancer (PrCA).
Participants were 19,042 male subjects in the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study (ACLS), ages 20-82years, who received a baseline medical examination including a maximal treadmill exercise test between 1976 and 2003. CRF levels were defined as low (lowest 20%), moderate (middle 40%), and high (upper 40%) according to age-specific distribution of treadmill duration from the overall ACLS population. PrCA was assessed from responses to mail-back health surveys during 1982-2004. Cox proportional hazards regression models, adjusted for potential confounders, were used to compute hazard ratios (HRs), 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), and incidence rates (per 10,000 person-years of follow-up).
A total of 634 men reported a diagnosis of incident PrCA during an average of 9.3 ± 7.1 years of follow-up. Adjusted HRs (95% CIs) in men with moderate and high CRF relative to low CRF were, 1.68 (1.13-2.48) and 1.74 (1.15-2.62), respectively. The positive association between CRF and PrCA was observed only in the strata of men who were not obese, had ≥ 1 follow-up examination, or who were diagnosed ≤ 1995.
Rather than revealing a causal relationship, the unexpected positive association observed between CRF and incident PrCA is most likely due to a screening/detection bias in more fit men who also are more health-conscious. Results have important implications for understanding the health-related factors that predispose men to receive PrCA screening that may lead to over-detection of indolent disease.
探讨心肺适能(CRF)与前列腺癌(PrCA)发病风险的关系。
参与者为 19042 名年龄在 20-82 岁的男性,他们参加了 1976 年至 2003 年期间的有氧运动中心纵向研究(ACLS)的基线体检,包括最大跑步机运动试验。根据整个 ACLS 人群从跑步机持续时间的年龄特异性分布,将 CRF 水平定义为低(最低 20%)、中(中间 40%)和高(最高 40%)。从 1982 年至 2004 年的邮件健康调查中评估了 PrCA 的发病情况。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型,根据潜在混杂因素进行调整,计算了危险比(HR)、95%置信区间(95%CI)和发病率(每 10000 人年随访)。
在平均 9.3±7.1 年的随访期间,共有 634 名男性报告了前列腺癌的发病诊断。与低 CRF 相比,中 CRF 和高 CRF 男性的调整后 HR(95%CI)分别为 1.68(1.13-2.48)和 1.74(1.15-2.62)。CRF 与 PrCA 之间的正相关仅在非肥胖、至少有一次随访检查或 1995 年以前确诊的男性亚组中观察到。
CRF 与前列腺癌发病风险之间的意外正相关关系并不是因果关系,最有可能是由于更健康的男性在进行前列腺癌筛查时存在筛查/检测偏差,这些男性也更关注健康。这些结果对于理解导致男性接受前列腺癌筛查的与健康相关的因素具有重要意义,这些因素可能导致惰性疾病的过度检测。