Suppr超能文献

芬诺瓦斯卡评分和改良的预防 III 评分预测下肢缺血性疾病经腔内和手术血运重建后长期预后。

Finnvasc score and modified Prevent III score predict long-term outcome after infrainguinal surgical and endovascular revascularization for critical limb ischemia.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2010 Nov;52(5):1218-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.101. Epub 2010 Aug 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Estimation of the risk of adverse long-term outcome is of paramount importance in the treatment of critical limb ischemia (CLI).

METHODS

We evaluated the accuracy of two specific risk score systems, the Finnvasc score and the modified Prevent III (mPIII) score, in 1425 CLI patients who underwent unilateral, infrainguinal surgical (47.6%) or endovascular (52.4%) revascularization. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to estimate the predictive value of these risk scoring methods.

RESULTS

The area under the ROC curve of Finnvasc score for prediction of 30-day amputation was 0.609 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.549-0.677) and of mPIII score 0.533 (95% CI 0.457-0.609). The area under ROC curve of Finnvasc score for prediction of 30-day amputation-free survival was 0.622 (95% CI 0.573-0.671) and of mPIII score 0.588 (95% CI 0.533-0.642). The area under the ROC curve of Finnvasc score for prediction of 1-year amputation-free survival was 0.630 (95% CI 0.597-0.663, P<.0001) and of mPIII score 0.634 (95% CI 0.600-0.667, P<.0001). Finnvasc score predicted leg salvage (relative risk [RR] 1.431, 95% CI 1.319-1.551), survival (RR 1.233, 95% CI 1.116-1.363), and amputation-free survival (RR 1.422, 95% CI 1.319-1.534). mPIII score also predicted leg salvage (RR 1.190, 95% CI 1.108-1.277), survival (RR 1.245, 95% CI 1.193-1.300), and amputation-free survival (RR 1.223, 95% CI 1.176-1.272).

CONCLUSIONS

Finnvasc and modified PIII risk scoring methods predict long-term outcome of patients undergoing infrainguinal revascularization for CLI. Finnvasc score seems to perform well also in predicting immediate postoperative outcome.

摘要

背景

在治疗严重肢体缺血(CLI)时,评估不良长期预后的风险至关重要。

方法

我们评估了两种特定风险评分系统(芬恩瓦夫斯评分和改良预防 III 评分[mPIII])在 1425 例接受单侧、下肢动脉腔内(47.6%)或血管外(52.4%)血运重建的 CLI 患者中的准确性。接收器工作特征(ROC)曲线分析用于估计这些风险评分方法的预测价值。

结果

芬恩瓦夫斯评分预测 30 天截肢的 ROC 曲线下面积为 0.609(95%置信区间[CI] 0.549-0.677),mPIII 评分为 0.533(95% CI 0.457-0.609)。芬恩瓦夫斯评分预测 30 天无截肢生存的 ROC 曲线下面积为 0.622(95% CI 0.573-0.671),mPIII 评分为 0.588(95% CI 0.533-0.642)。芬恩瓦夫斯评分预测 1 年无截肢生存的 ROC 曲线下面积为 0.630(95% CI 0.597-0.663,P<.0001),mPIII 评分为 0.634(95% CI 0.600-0.667,P<.0001)。芬恩瓦夫斯评分预测保肢(相对风险[RR] 1.431,95% CI 1.319-1.551)、生存(RR 1.233,95% CI 1.116-1.363)和无截肢生存(RR 1.422,95% CI 1.319-1.534)。mPIII 评分还预测保肢(RR 1.190,95% CI 1.108-1.277)、生存(RR 1.245,95% CI 1.193-1.300)和无截肢生存(RR 1.223,95% CI 1.176-1.272)。

结论

芬恩瓦夫斯和改良 PIII 风险评分方法可预测 CLI 患者下肢动脉血运重建的长期预后。芬恩瓦夫斯评分似乎也能很好地预测术后即刻的预后。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验