• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同材料在根管治疗牙中封闭根尖孔的能力。

Intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth.

机构信息

Department of Dental Pathology and Therapeutics, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 Jan 1;16(1):e105-9.

PMID:20711157
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate Cavit TM G, ProRoot TM MTA and Tetric® EvoFlow as intraorifice barriers to prevent coronal microleakage in root canal treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

Forty-two human single rooted teeth were divided randomly in three experimental groups of 10 specimens each and two control groups. The experimental groups were prepared with hand instrumentation and cold lateral condensed technique of the gutta-percha. Four millimetres of coronal gutta-percha were removed and replaced by one of the following filling materials: Cavit TM G, Tetric® EvoFlow or ProRoot TM MTA. In the experimental groups, leakage was measured by the concentration of leaked glucose in the apical reservoir at 1, 7, 30, and 45 days, using the enzymatic glucose oxidase method. Data were analyzed by means of Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests at α=0.05.

RESULTS

The glucose penetration results of three experimental groups increased gradually over time. No significant differences were found among groups at 24 hours and 1 week. At thirty and forty-five days, Cavit TM and Tetric® EvoFlow values were significantly different (p=0.007 and p=0.023, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The sealing ability of the Cavit TM G, ProRoot TM MTA and Tetric® EvoFlow used as intraorifice materials tends to be similar over time.

摘要

目的

评估 CavitTMG、ProRootTMTA 和 Tetric®EvoFlow 作为根管内屏障,以防止根管治疗中的冠部微渗漏。

研究设计

将 42 个人工单根牙随机分为 3 个实验组(每组 10 个样本)和 2 个对照组。实验组采用手用器械和冷侧压技术进行根管预备,并用牙胶尖冷侧压充填。去除 4mm 的冠部牙胶,并用以下充填材料之一替代:CavitTMG、Tetric®EvoFlow 或 ProRootTMTA。在实验组中,使用酶葡萄糖氧化酶法,通过根尖储库中漏出的葡萄糖浓度来测量渗漏,在第 1、7、30 和 45 天进行测量。使用 Mann-Whitney U 和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验,α=0.05。

结果

三组实验的葡萄糖渗透结果随时间逐渐增加。在 24 小时和 1 周时,各组之间无显著差异。在第 30 天和第 45 天,CavitTMG 和 Tetric®EvoFlow 的值有显著差异(p=0.007 和 p=0.023)。

结论

CavitTMG、ProRootTMTA 和 Tetric®EvoFlow 作为根管内材料的密封能力随时间趋于相似。

相似文献

1
Intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth.不同材料在根管治疗牙中封闭根尖孔的能力。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 Jan 1;16(1):e105-9.
2
Microleakage evaluation of intraorifice sealing materials in endodontically treated teeth.根管治疗后牙齿髓室口封闭材料的微渗漏评估
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Aug;102(2):242-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.10.055. Epub 2006 Apr 21.
3
Sealing ability of three materials in the orifice of root canal systems obturated with gutta-percha.三种材料在牙胶充填的根管系统根尖孔处的封闭能力。
J Endod. 2006 Mar;32(3):225-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.042.
4
Fluid flow evaluation of Fuji Triage and gray and white ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate intraorifice barriers.富士分诊法以及灰色和白色的MTA根尖孔屏障的流体流动评估
J Endod. 2008 Jul;34(7):830-2. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.014. Epub 2008 May 2.
5
A comparative study of four coronal obturation materials in endodontic treatment.四种根管充填材料在牙髓病治疗中的对比研究。
J Endod. 1999 Mar;25(3):178-80. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80137-X.
6
Sealing ability of MTA and radiopaque Portland cement with or without calcium chloride for root-end filling.含或不含氯化钙的MTA和不透射线的波特兰水泥用于根尖充填的封闭能力。
J Endod. 2006 Sep;32(9):897-900. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.04.006. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
7
Intraorifice sealing of gutta-percha obturated root canals to prevent coronal microleakage.牙胶尖充填根管的管内口封闭以防止冠部微渗漏。
J Endod. 1998 Oct;24(10):659-62. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80150-7.
8
The effectiveness of different thickness of mineral trioxide aggregate on coronal leakage in endodontically treated deciduous teeth.不同厚度的三氧化矿物凝聚体对根管治疗乳磨牙冠部微渗漏的影响
J Dent Child (Chic). 2008 Sep-Dec;75(3):260-3.
9
Comparing Bacterial Leakage of Three Intraorifice Barrier Sealing Materials against and .比较三种内孔屏障密封材料对 和 的细菌泄漏。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Jun 1;22(6):674-679.
10
Comparative in vitro study of the sealing efficiency of white vs grey ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate formulas as apical barriers.白色与灰色ProRoot三氧化矿物凝聚体配方作为根尖屏障的封闭效率的体外比较研究。
Dent Traumatol. 2008 Apr;24(2):207-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2007.00516.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of coronal microleakage of intra-orifice barrier materials in endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review.根管治疗后牙齿中根管口封闭材料的冠向微渗漏评估:一项系统评价
J Conserv Dent. 2022 Nov-Dec;25(6):588-595. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_377_22. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
2
Effect of an Intraorifice Barrier on Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies.管内屏障对根管治疗牙的影响:体外研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jan 20;2022:2789073. doi: 10.1155/2022/2789073. eCollection 2022.
3
The Effectiveness of Laser-Activated Irrigation on the Apical Microleakage Qualities of MTA Repair HP and NeoMTA Plus in Simulated Immature Teeth: A Comparative Study.
激光激活冲洗对模拟未成熟牙中MTA Repair HP和NeoMTA Plus根尖微渗漏特性的有效性:一项对比研究。
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jul 23;13(15):3287. doi: 10.3390/ma13153287.
4
Microleakage of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Calcium-Enriched Mixture Cement and Biodentine Intra-Orifice Barriers.三氧化矿物凝聚体、富钙混合水泥和生物陶瓷根管口封闭材料的微渗漏
Iran Endod J. 2017 Spring;12(2):211-215. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.41.
5
Coronal microleakage of three different dental biomaterials as intra-orifice barrier during nonvital bleaching.三种不同牙科生物材料作为非活髓漂白过程中根管口屏障的冠部微渗漏
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015 Nov-Dec;12(6):581-8. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.170582.
6
Effect of intra-orifice barriers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth - an ex-vivo study.根管口屏障对根管治疗后牙齿抗折性的影响——一项体外研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Feb;9(2):ZC17-20. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11609.5552. Epub 2015 Feb 1.
7
Microleakage comparison of four dental materials as intra-orifice barriers in endodontically treated teeth.四种牙科材料作为根管治疗牙齿髓室口屏障的微渗漏比较
Iran Endod J. 2012 Winter;7(1):25-30. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
8
An in vitro comparison of coronal microleakage of three orifice barriers filling materials.三种根管口封闭材料冠部微渗漏的体外比较
Iran Endod J. 2012 Summer;7(3):156-60. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
9
Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives to pulp chamber dentin after irrigation with Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.用乙二胺四乙酸冲洗后,粘结剂与髓腔牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度。
J Conserv Dent. 2012 Jul;15(3):242-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.97947.
10
Effect of intra-orifice depth on sealing ability of four materials in the orifices of root-filled teeth: an ex-vivo study.根管口深度对四种材料封闭根管治疗后牙齿根管口封闭能力的影响:一项离体研究
Int J Dent. 2012;2012:318108. doi: 10.1155/2012/318108. Epub 2012 May 22.