Marks David F
Psychol Rep. 2010 Jun;106(3):643-64. doi: 10.2466/pr0.106.3.643-664.
A body of data on IQ collected over 50 years has revealed that average population IQ varies across time, race, and nationality. An explanation for these differences may be that intelligence test performance requires literacy skills not present in all people to the same extent. In eight analyses, population mean full scale IQ and literacy scores yielded correlations ranging from .79 to .99. In cohort studies, significantly larger improvements in IQ occurred in the lower half of the IQ distribution, affecting the distribution variance and skewness in the predicted manner. In addition, three Verbal subscales on the WAIS show the largest Flynn effect sizes and all four Verbal subscales are among those showing the highest racial IQ differences. This pattern of findings supports the hypothesis that both secular and racial differences in intelligence test scores have an environmental explanation: secular and racial differences in IQ are an artifact of variation in literacy skills. These findings suggest that racial IQ distributions will converge if opportunities are equalized for different population groups to achieve the same high level of literacy skills. Social justice requires more effective implementation of policies and programs designed to eliminate inequities in IQ and literacy.
一项历时50多年收集的关于智商(IQ)的数据表明,不同时期、种族和国籍的人群平均智商有所不同。这些差异的一个解释可能是,智力测试的表现需要读写能力,而并非所有人都具备同等程度的读写能力。在八项分析中,人群平均全量表智商与读写分数的相关性在0.79至0.99之间。在队列研究中,智商分布下半部分的智商有显著更大幅度的提高,以预测的方式影响了分布方差和偏度。此外,韦氏成人智力量表(WAIS)的三个言语分量表显示出最大的弗林效应量,并且所有四个言语分量表都属于种族智商差异最大的那些分量表。这种研究结果模式支持了这样一种假设,即智力测试分数的长期差异和种族差异都有环境方面的解释:智商的长期差异和种族差异是读写能力差异的产物。这些发现表明,如果不同人群有平等机会获得相同高水平的读写能力,种族智商分布将会趋同。社会正义要求更有效地实施旨在消除智商和读写能力方面不平等的政策和计划。