Ashwell Associates Limited, Ashwell Street, Ashwell, Hertfordshire SG7 5PZ, UK.
Br J Nutr. 2010 Aug;104(4):612-9. doi: 10.1017/S000711451000214X.
The consensus workshop, organised on behalf of the Food Standards Agency, was convened to recommend the most appropriate and secure method for measuring vitamin D status in the UK. Workshop participants (the Expert Panel) were invited on the basis of expertise in current 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) assays, or expertise in vitamin D nutrition and metabolism or detailed knowledge and experience in the National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS). A decision support matrix, which set out the particular criteria by which the different options were scored and evaluated, was used to structure the discussion. The Expert Panel agreed that five methods for measuring 25OHD should be evaluated according to eleven criteria, selected on the basis of their relevance to the NDNS. All three of the evaluating subgroups of the Expert Panel produced similar total scores over the eleven criteria for the different methods; they scored LC-MS/MS and HPLC-UV similarly highly, while the scores for the immunoassay methods were lower. The Expert Panel recommended that an LC-MS/MS method should be the preferred method for the NDNS. A detailed specification for the method will be required to ensure comparability between NDNS and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in the US facilitating future comparisons. The Expert Panel also recommended that the method should be carried out in a laboratory with appropriate expertise, competency and history of records of good performance. The method should be standardised against the National Institute of Standards and Technology SRM 972. If the recommended LC-MS/MS is adopted, the Expert Panel indicated that the method should be able to discriminate the C-3 epimer of 25OHD(3), especially if used to measure 25OHD in young infants in the forthcoming Diet and Nutrition Survey of Infants and Young Children, who are known to have high circulating concentrations of the C-3 epimer.
该共识研讨会是应食品标准局的要求组织的,旨在推荐最适合和安全的方法来测量英国的维生素 D 状态。研讨会参与者(专家小组)是根据当前 25-羟维生素 D(25OHD)检测方法的专业知识,或维生素 D 营养和代谢方面的专业知识,或在国家饮食和营养调查(NDNS)方面的详细知识和经验被邀请的。决策支持矩阵列出了不同选项的评分和评估的特定标准,用于构建讨论。专家小组同意根据与 NDNS 的相关性,根据十一项标准评估五种测量 25OHD 的方法。专家组的三个评估小组在十一项标准上对不同方法的总评分相似;他们对 LC-MS/MS 和 HPLC-UV 的评分同样高,而免疫测定方法的评分较低。专家小组建议 LC-MS/MS 方法应成为 NDNS 的首选方法。需要详细的方法规范,以确保 NDNS 与美国国家健康和营养检查调查之间的可比性,从而促进未来的比较。专家小组还建议该方法应由具有适当专业知识、能力和良好绩效记录的实验室进行。该方法应针对国家标准与技术研究院的 SRM 972 进行标准化。如果采用建议的 LC-MS/MS,专家组表示该方法应能够区分 25OHD(3)的 C-3 差向异构体,特别是如果用于测量即将进行的婴幼儿饮食和营养调查中年轻婴儿的 25OHD,众所周知,这些婴儿的 C-3 差向异构体循环浓度较高。