Intent-to-Treat vs. Non-Intent-to-Treat Analyses under Treatment Non-Adherence in Mental Health Randomized Trials.
作者信息
Ten Have Thomas R, Normand Sharon-Lise T, Marcus Sue M, Brown C Hendricks, Lavori Philip, Duan Naihua
机构信息
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, 607 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Dr., Philadelphia, PA 19104.
出版信息
Psychiatr Ann. 2008 Dec;38(12):772-783. doi: 10.3928/00485713-20081201-10.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Intent-to-Treat vs. Non-Intent-to-Treat Analyses under Treatment Non-Adherence in Mental Health Randomized Trials.心理健康随机试验中治疗不依从情况下的意向性分析与非意向性分析
Psychiatr Ann. 2008 Dec;38(12):772-783. doi: 10.3928/00485713-20081201-10.
2
Causal inference methods to assess safety upper bounds in randomized trials with noncompliance.在存在不依从性的随机试验中评估安全性上限的因果推断方法。
Clin Trials. 2015 Jun;12(3):265-75. doi: 10.1177/1740774515572352. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
3
Intent-to-treat analysis and the problem of crossovers. An example from the Veterans Administration coronary bypass surgery study.意向性分析与交叉问题。来自退伍军人管理局冠状动脉搭桥手术研究的一个例子。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991 Mar;101(3):481-7.
4
On estimating treatment effects under non-compliance in randomized clinical trials: are intent-to-treat or instrumental variables analyses perfect solutions?关于在随机临床试验中估计不依从情况下的治疗效果：意向性分析或工具变量分析是完美的解决方案吗？
Stat Med. 2007 Feb 28;26(5):954-64. doi: 10.1002/sim.2663.
5
A randomized trial of web-based fertility-tracking software and fecundability.基于网络的生育追踪软件与可育性的随机试验
Fertil Steril. 2023 Jun;119(6):1045-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.02.005. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
6
Intent-to-treat analysis of cluster randomized trials when clusters report unidentifiable outcome proportions.意向治疗分析在当簇报告不可识别的结局比例时的集群随机试验。
Clin Trials. 2020 Dec;17(6):627-636. doi: 10.1177/1740774520936668. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
7
A Nature-Based Intervention and Mental Health of Schoolchildren: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.基于自然的干预措施对学童心理健康的影响：一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2444824. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44824.
8
Effect of a Tailored eHealth Physical Activity Intervention on Physical Activity and Depression During Postpartum: Randomized Controlled Trial (The Postpartum Wellness Study).个性化电子健康体育活动干预对产后体育活动和抑郁的影响：随机对照试验（产后健康研究）
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 May 22;12:e64507. doi: 10.2196/64507.
9
Dropout rates for intent-to-treat and per protocol analyses.意向性分析和符合方案分析的失访率。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;137(4):639-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2003.11.028.
10
Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle.意向性分析原则中的统计学考量
Control Clin Trials. 2000 Jun;21(3):167-89. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(00)00046-5.
引用本文的文献
1
Feasibility of a Digital Coaching Program for Improving Mental Well-Being and Emotional Intelligence: Pragmatic Retrospective Cohort Study.一项关于改善心理健康和情商的数字辅导计划的可行性：实用回顾性队列研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 7;9:e71828. doi: 10.2196/71828.
2
Accounting for extent of non-compliance when estimating treatment effects on an ordinal outcome in randomized clinical trials.在随机临床试验中估计对有序结局的治疗效果时考虑不依从的程度。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02493-6.
3
Phase-Based Care in Community Mental Health: A Cost-Effective Innovation Using Algorithms, Rating Scales and Treatment Teams for Depression Management.基于阶段的社区心理健康护理：使用算法、评分量表和治疗团队进行抑郁管理的具有成本效益的创新。
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Nov;60(8):1505-1510. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01303-5. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
4
Efficacy and safety of long-acting injectable oral antipsychotics in the treatment of patients with early-phase schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.长效注射用口服抗精神病药物治疗早期精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的疗效与安全性：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2024 Jun 2;14:20451253241257062. doi: 10.1177/20451253241257062. eCollection 2024.
5
Lifestyle Coaching May Be an Effective Treatment for Schizophrenia.生活方式指导可能是治疗精神分裂症的有效方法。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2022 Dec 1;18(2):156-161. doi: 10.1177/15598276221142307. eCollection 2024 Mar-Apr.
6
Acute and Extended Anxiolytic Effects of Cannabidiol in Cannabis Flower: A Quasi-Experimental Use Study.大麻花中大麻二酚的急性和扩展抗焦虑作用：一项准实验使用研究。
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2024 Aug;9(4):1015-1027. doi: 10.1089/can.2023.0187. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
7
Protective effect of intensive glucose lowering therapy on all-cause mortality, adjusted for treatment switching using G-estimation method, the ACCORD trial.使用 G 估计法校正治疗转换后强化降糖治疗对全因死亡率的保护作用：ACCORD 试验。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 10;13(1):5833. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32855-3.
8
Keep It Up! 3.0: Study protocol for a type III hybrid implementation-effectiveness cluster-randomized trial.坚持下去！3.0 版：一项 III 型混合实施-有效性整群随机试验的研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Apr;127:107134. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107134. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
9
Social Support Coping for African American Adolescents: Effect of a Culturally Grounded Randomized Controlled Trial Intervention.社会支持应对策略对非裔美国青少年的影响：一项基于文化的随机对照试验干预研究。
Prev Sci. 2023 May;24(4):715-727. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01484-z. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
10
Power analysis for idiographic (within-subject) clinical trials: Implications for treatments of rare conditions and precision medicine.个体（受试者内）临床试验的功效分析：对罕见病治疗和精准医学的启示。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Dec;55(8):4175-4199. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-02012-1. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
本文引用的文献
1
The conflict between random assignment and treatment preference: implications for internal validity.随机分配与治疗偏好之间的冲突：对内部效度的影响。
Eval Program Plann. 2003 May;26(2):109-21. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7189(03)00014-4.
2
Preference-based instrumental variable methods for the estimation of treatment effects: assessing validity and interpreting results.用于估计治疗效果的基于偏好的工具变量方法：评估有效性与解释结果
Int J Biostat. 2007;3(1):Article 14. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1072.
3
A placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of naltrexone in the context of different levels of psychosocial intervention.在不同水平心理社会干预背景下进行的纳曲酮安慰剂对照随机临床试验。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008 Jul;32(7):1299-308. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00698.x.
4
A comparison of methods for estimating the causal effect of a treatment in randomized clinical trials subject to noncompliance.在存在不依从性的随机临床试验中，估计治疗因果效应的方法比较。
Biometrics. 2009 Jun;65(2):640-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01066.x. Epub 2008 May 28.
5
Health risks and benefits 3 years after stopping randomized treatment with estrogen and progestin.停止雌激素和孕激素随机治疗3年后的健康风险与益处
JAMA. 2008 Mar 5;299(9):1036-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.9.1036.
6
Modelling treatment-effect heterogeneity in randomized controlled trials of complex interventions (psychological treatments).复杂干预（心理治疗）随机对照试验中治疗效果异质性的建模
Stat Med. 2007 Nov 20;26(26):4719-45. doi: 10.1002/sim.2891.
7
An introduction to causal modeling in clinical trials.临床试验中的因果模型介绍。
Clin Trials. 2007;4(1):58-73. doi: 10.1177/1740774506075549.
8
Is some provider advice on smoking cessation better than no advice? An instrumental variable analysis of the 2001 National Health Interview Survey.某些关于戒烟的医疗建议是否比没有建议更好？对2001年国民健康访谈调查的一项工具变量分析。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Dec;41(6):2114-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00592.x.
9
Instruments for causal inference: an epidemiologist's dream?因果推断的工具：流行病学家的梦想？
Epidemiology. 2006 Jul;17(4):360-72. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000222409.00878.37.
10
Randomized controlled trial of effect of prescription of clozapine versus other second-generation antipsychotic drugs in resistant schizophrenia.氯氮平与其他第二代抗精神病药物治疗难治性精神分裂症效果的随机对照试验
Schizophr Bull. 2006 Oct;32(4):715-23. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbj067. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
Zotero 插件