• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经典条件反射中的两种注意力:学习混合模型的证据。

Two kinds of attention in Pavlovian conditioning: evidence for a hybrid model of learning.

作者信息

Haselgrove Mark, Esber Guillem R, Pearce John M, Jones Peter M

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, England.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Oct;36(4):456-70. doi: 10.1037/a0018528.

DOI:10.1037/a0018528
PMID:20718552
Abstract

Four appetitive Pavlovian conditioning experiments with rats examined the rate at which the discrimination between compounds AY and AX was solved relative to the discrimination between compounds AY and BY. In Experiments 1 and 2, these discriminations were preceded by training in which A and B were continuously reinforced and X and Y were partially reinforced. Consistent with the Pearce and Hall (1980) model, the results showed that the AY/AX discrimination was solved more readily than the AY/BY discrimination. In Experiments 3 and 4, the discriminations were preceded by feature-positive training in which trials with AX and BY signaled food but trials with X and Y did not. Consistent with the Mackintosh (1975) model, the results showed that the AY/BY discrimination was solved more readily than the AY/AX discrimination. These results are discussed with respect to a hybrid model of conditioning and attention.

摘要

四项针对大鼠的经典性条件反射实验研究了相对于化合物AY与BY之间的辨别,化合物AY与AX之间的辨别被解决的速率。在实验1和实验2中,这些辨别之前进行了训练,其中A和B持续得到强化,而X和Y部分得到强化。与皮尔斯和霍尔(1980年)的模型一致,结果表明,AY/AX辨别比AY/BY辨别更容易解决。在实验3和实验4中,辨别之前进行了特征性阳性训练,其中AX和BY的试验表明有食物,但X和Y的试验则没有。与麦金托什(1975年)的模型一致,结果表明,AY/BY辨别比AY/AX辨别更容易解决。针对条件反射与注意力的混合模型对这些结果进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Two kinds of attention in Pavlovian conditioning: evidence for a hybrid model of learning.经典条件反射中的两种注意力:学习混合模型的证据。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Oct;36(4):456-70. doi: 10.1037/a0018528.
2
Overshadowing and associability change.遮蔽与联想性变化。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Jul;37(3):287-99. doi: 10.1037/a0023140.
3
Overshadowing and associability change: examining the contribution of differential stimulus exposure.遮蔽与联想性变化:考察差异刺激暴露的作用。
Learn Behav. 2013 Mar;41(1):107-17. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0089-z.
4
Differences in the associability of relevant and irrelevant stimuli.相关刺激与无关刺激在可关联性上的差异。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Apr;36(2):258-67. doi: 10.1037/a0016588.
5
Pavlovian biconditional discrimination learning in the C57BL/6J mouse.C57BL/6J小鼠的巴甫洛夫双条件辨别学习
Behav Processes. 2012 Jun;90(2):278-86. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.02.017. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
6
Occasion setting in Pavlovian ambiguous target discriminations.巴甫洛夫式模糊目标辨别中的情境设定
Behav Processes. 2008 Nov;79(3):132-47. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
7
Differential outcome effects in pavlovian biconditional and ambiguous occasion setting tasks.巴甫洛夫双条件和模糊情境设置任务中的差异结果效应
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Oct;36(4):471-81. doi: 10.1037/a0019136.
8
The fate of redundant cues during blocking and a simple discrimination.在阻断和简单辨别过程中多余线索的命运。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2012 Apr;38(2):167-79. doi: 10.1037/a0027662.
9
Asymmetry between excitatory and inhibitory learning.兴奋性学习与抑制性学习之间的不对称性。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Oct;42(4):297-312. doi: 10.1037/xan0000110. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
10
Discrimination reversal facilitates subsequent acquisition of temporal discriminations in rats' appetitive conditioning.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Oct;45(4):446-463. doi: 10.1037/xan0000216. Epub 2019 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of prediction in learned predictiveness.预测在学习预测性中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2022 Jul;48(3):203-221. doi: 10.1037/xan0000330.
2
Models of Dynamic Belief Updating in Psychosis-A Review Across Different Computational Approaches.精神病中动态信念更新模型——不同计算方法综述
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 12;13:814111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.814111. eCollection 2022.
3
Surprise-induced enhancements in the associability of Pavlovian cues facilitate learning across behavior systems.惊讶诱导的巴甫洛夫线索的联想增强促进了跨行为系统的学习。
Behav Neurosci. 2022 Aug;136(4):285-292. doi: 10.1037/bne0000505. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
4
A model for learning based on the joint estimation of stochasticity and volatility.基于随机波动联合估计的学习模型。
Nat Commun. 2021 Nov 15;12(1):6587. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26731-9.
5
Uncertainty and predictiveness modulate attention in human predictive learning.不确定性和可预测性调节人类预测性学习中的注意力。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Jun;150(6):1177-1202. doi: 10.1037/xge0000991. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
6
Leveraging Basic Science for the Clinic-From Bench to Bedside.基础科学向临床的转化——从实验室到病床边。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 1;78(3):331-334. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.3656.
7
Responding to preconditioned cues is devaluation sensitive and requires orbitofrontal cortex during cue-cue learning.对条件线索的反应具有贬损敏感性,并且在线索-线索学习期间需要眶额皮质。
Elife. 2020 Aug 24;9:e59998. doi: 10.7554/eLife.59998.
8
A systems-neuroscience model of phasic dopamine.相位多巴胺的系统神经科学模型。
Psychol Rev. 2020 Nov;127(6):972-1021. doi: 10.1037/rev0000199. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
9
Reward anticipation and punishment anticipation are instantiated in the brain via opponent mechanisms.奖赏预期和惩罚预期是通过大脑中的对立机制来实现的。
Psychophysiology. 2019 Aug;56(8):e13381. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13381. Epub 2019 May 6.
10
The effects of extinction-aroused attention on context conditioning.消退引发的注意对情境条件作用的影响。
Learn Mem. 2018 Mar 15;25(4):165-175. doi: 10.1101/lm.046201.117. Print 2018 Apr.