The effects of normalization method on antagonistic activity patterns during eccentric and concentric isokinetic knee extension and flexion.

The purpose of this study was to compare different normalization methods of electromyographic (EMG) activity of antagonists during isokinetic eccentric and concentric knee movements. Twelve women performed three maximum knee extensions and flexions isometrically and at isokinetic concentric and eccentric angular velocities of 30 degrees .s(-1), 90 degrees .s(-1), 120 degrees .s(-1) and 150 degrees .s(-1). The EMG activity of the vastus lateralis, rectus femoris, vastus medialis and hamstrings was recorded. The antagonist integrated IEMG values were normalized relative to the EMG of the same muscle during an isometric maximal action (static method). The values were also expressed as a percentage of the EMG activity of the same muscle, at the same angle, angular velocity and muscle action (dynamic method) when the muscle was acting as an agonist. Three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) designs indicated significantly greater IEMG normalized with the dynamic method compared to the EMG derived using the static method (P < 0.05). These differences were more evident at concentric angular velocities and at the first and last 20 degrees of the movement. The present findings demonstrate that the method of normalization significantly influences the conclusions on antagonistic activity during isokinetic maximum voluntary efforts. The dynamic method of normalization is more appropriate because it considers the effects of muscle action, muscle length and angular velocity on antagonist IEMG.