• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨盆入口和出口射线照片重新定义。

Pelvic inlet and outlet radiographs redefined.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 1 Barnes Hospital Plaza, Suite 11300, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Aug 18;92(10):1947-53. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01580.

DOI:10.2106/JBJS.I.01580
PMID:20720137
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal plain radiographic imaging protocols are typically predicated on orthogonal views of the bone or joint being evaluated. Pelvic injury has been evaluated with 45 degrees inlet and 45 degrees outlet radiographs. While these views are perpendicular to each other, they may not be in the best plane to evaluate pelvic injury because of variable lumbopelvic anatomy. We hypothesized that inlet and outlet radiographic views optimized to examine the clinically relevant osseous landmarks vary substantially from routine 45 degrees inlet and outlet views.

METHODS

Sixty-eight consecutive patients without pelvic ring disruption who had undergone routine axial pelvic computed tomography scans were retrospectively identified. The optimal inlet and outlet angles required to profile the clinically relevant pelvic anatomy were quantified for each patient with use of sagittal computed tomography reconstructions.

RESULTS

The optimal inlet angle to profile the anterior body of S1 required an average caudal tilt of 21 degrees . The average outlet angle (cephalad tilt) perpendicular to the body of S1 was 63 degrees and perpendicular to S2 was 57 degrees . The optimal angles were the same for male and female patients and for patients with normal and dysmorphic pelves and were independent of patient age.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening inlet and screening outlet radiographs made at 25 degrees and 60 degrees , respectively, are recommended to provide accurate profiles of the clinically relevant posterior osseous pelvic anatomy.

摘要

背景

肌肉骨骼的普通 X 光影像学检查方案通常基于待评估的骨骼或关节的正交视图。骨盆损伤的评估采用 45 度入口和 45 度出口 X 光片。虽然这些视图彼此垂直,但由于腰骶骨盆解剖结构的差异,它们可能不在评估骨盆损伤的最佳平面上。我们假设,为检查临床相关的骨性标志而优化的入口和出口 X 光视图与常规的 45 度入口和出口 X 光视图有很大的不同。

方法

回顾性地确定了 68 例没有骨盆环破裂且接受过常规轴向骨盆 CT 扫描的连续患者。使用矢状 CT 重建,对每位患者进行量化,以确定检查临床相关骨盆解剖结构所需的最佳入口和出口角度。

结果

为了对 S1 的前体进行成像,最佳入口角度需要平均向下倾斜 21 度。与 S1 体部垂直的平均出口角度(头倾)为 63 度,与 S2 垂直的角度为 57 度。最佳角度对男性和女性患者、正常和畸形骨盆患者以及与患者年龄无关的患者均相同。

结论

建议分别使用 25 度和 60 度的筛查入口和筛查出口 X 光片,以提供临床相关的后部骨性骨盆解剖结构的准确图像。

相似文献

1
Pelvic inlet and outlet radiographs redefined.骨盆入口和出口射线照片重新定义。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Aug 18;92(10):1947-53. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01580.
2
Reexamination of pelvic inlet and outlet images using 3-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions.采用三维 CT 重建技术对骨盆入口和出口图像进行再次检查。
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Jun;28(6):324-9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000018.
3
Standardized posterior pelvic imaging: use of CT inlet and CT outlet for evaluation and management of pelvic ring injuries.标准化骨盆后方成像:利用CT入口位和CT出口位评估及处理骨盆环损伤
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Dec;28(12):665-73. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000127.
4
Correlating preoperative imaging with intraoperative fluoroscopy in iliosacral screw placement.在髂骶螺钉置入术中,将术前影像学与术中透视进行关联。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2015 Dec;16(4):309-16. doi: 10.1007/s10195-015-0363-x. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
5
Incidence of Suboptimal Fluoroscopic Outlet Imaging of the Sacrum and Pelvic Retroversion Necessary for Optimal Views.骶骨和骨盆后倾的透视出口成像不理想的发生率,对于获得最佳视野是必要的。
J Orthop Trauma. 2024 Jun 1;38(6):299-305. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002795.
6
Radiographic Assessment of Pelvic Inlet and Outlet View Angles in the Ethiopian Population.埃塞俄比亚人群骨盆入口和出口视角的影像学评估
JB JS Open Access. 2024 Aug 19;9(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00015. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
7
Iliosacral screw placement: are uniplanar changes realistic based on standard fluoroscopic imaging?髂骶螺钉置入:基于标准透视成像的单平面改变是否切实可行?
J Trauma. 2011 Jul;71(1):204-8; discussion 208. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31821e842a.
8
[Influence of the included angle between anterior aspects of S2 and S1 vertebral bodies on pelvic inlet imaging in mid-line sagittal plane].
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2014 Aug;27(8):645-9.
9
[The role of plain radiography in pelvic trauma in the era of advanced computed tomography].[普通X线摄影在先进计算机断层扫描时代骨盆创伤中的作用]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006 Dec;73(6):394-9.
10
Radiological evaluation of pelvic inlet and outlet radiographic view in Indian population.印度人群骨盆入口和出口X线片的放射学评估。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018 Oct-Dec;9(4):334-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Special screw corridors and imaging in pelvic ring trauma.骨盆环创伤中的特殊螺钉通道与影像学
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Jan 4;145(1):110. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05610-0.
2
Radiographic Assessment of Pelvic Inlet and Outlet View Angles in the Ethiopian Population.埃塞俄比亚人群骨盆入口和出口视角的影像学评估
JB JS Open Access. 2024 Aug 19;9(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00015. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
3
Intraoperative computerised tomography scan for percutaneous fixation of the pelvis: a retrospective case series.
术中计算机断层扫描在骨盆经皮固定中的应用:一项回顾性病例系列研究。
Int Orthop. 2024 Oct;48(10):2743-2748. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06265-7. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
4
Higher pelvic incidence values are a risk factor for trans-iliac trans-sacral screw malposition in sacroiliac complex fracture treatment.骨盆入口平面倾斜角较大是骶髂复合体骨折经髂骨-骶骨螺钉固定后螺钉位置不良的危险因素。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2023 Sep 21;24(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s10195-023-00728-0.
5
A novel biplanar positioning technique to guide iliosacral screw insertion: a retrospective study.一种新型双平面定位技术引导骶髂螺钉置入:回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 May 11;24(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06482-y.
6
Percutaneous iliosacral screw insertion with only outlet and inlet fluoroscopic view for unstable pelvic ring injuries: Clinical and radiological outcomes.仅通过出口位和入口位透视进行经皮髂骶螺钉置入治疗不稳定骨盆环损伤:临床和影像学结果
Surg Neurol Int. 2022 Sep 30;13:455. doi: 10.25259/SNI_616_2022. eCollection 2022.
7
Application of a three-dimensional virtual model to study the effect of fluoroscopic angle on infra-acetabular corridor parameters and screw insertion rates.应用三维虚拟模型研究透视角度对髋臼下腔参数和螺钉置入率的影响。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Sep 26;16(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02730-w.
8
Computerised Tomography Analysis of Pelvic Inlet and Outlet Fluoroscopic View Angles.骨盆入口和出口透视视角的计算机断层扫描分析
Indian J Orthop. 2020 Jun 27;54(5):687-694. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00169-5. eCollection 2020 Sep.
9
Intra- and interrater reliabilities and a method comparison of 2D and 3D techniques in cadavers to determine sacroiliac screw loosening.尸体中评估骶髂螺钉松动的 2D 和 3D 技术的组内和组间可靠性以及方法比较。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 28;9(1):3141. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40052-4.
10
Radiological evaluation of pelvic inlet and outlet radiographic view in Indian population.印度人群骨盆入口和出口X线片的放射学评估。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018 Oct-Dec;9(4):334-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 Jun 20.