Suppr超能文献

健康的早产儿需要神经心理学随访吗?与足月婴儿相比的学龄前结局。

Do healthy preterm children need neuropsychological follow-up? Preschool outcomes compared with term peers.

机构信息

Unit of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neurosciences, Bambino Gesù Paediatric Hospital, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010 Oct;52(10):955-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03730.x. Epub 2010 Aug 16.

Abstract

AIM

the aim of this study was to determine neuropsychological performance (possibly predictive of academic difficulties) and its relationship with cognitive development and maternal education in healthy preterm children of preschool age and age-matched comparison children born at term.

METHOD

a total of 35 infants who were born at less than 33 weeks' gestational age and who were free from major neurosensory disability (16 males, 19 females; mean gestational age 29.4wk, SD 2.2wk; mean birthweight 1257g, SD 327g) and 50 term-born comparison children (25 males, 25 females; mean birthweight 3459g, SD 585g) were assessed at 4 years of age. Cognition was measured using the Griffiths Mental Development scales while neuropsychological abilities (language, short-term memory, visual-motor and constructive spatial abilities, and visual processing) were assessed using standardized tests. Multivariable regression analysis was used to explore the effects of preterm birth and sociodemographic factors on cognition, and to adjust neuropsychological scores for cognitive level and maternal education.

RESULTS

the mean total Griffiths score was significantly lower in preterm than in term children (97.4 vs 103.4; p<0.001). Factors associated with higher Griffiths score were maternal university education (β=6.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7-11.7) and having older siblings or a twin (β=4.0; 95% CI 0.5-7.6). At neuropsychological assessment, preterm children scored significantly lower than term comparison children in all tests except lexical production (Boston Naming Test) and visual-processing accuracy. After adjustment for cognitive level and maternal education, differences remained statistically significant for verbal fluency (p<0.05) and comprehension, short-term memory, and spatial abilities (p<0.01).

INTERPRETATION

neuropsychological follow-up is also recommended for healthy very preterm children to identify strengths and challenges before school entry, and to plan interventions aimed at maximizing academic success.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定神经心理学表现(可能预测学业困难)及其与认知发展和母亲教育的关系,研究对象为学龄前健康早产儿和足月出生的年龄匹配的对照组儿童。

方法

共有 35 名胎龄小于 33 周且无重大神经感觉障碍的婴儿(男 16 名,女 19 名;平均胎龄 29.4 周,标准差 2.2 周;平均出生体重 1257 克,标准差 327 克)和 50 名足月出生的对照组儿童(男 25 名,女 25 名;平均出生体重 3459 克,标准差 585 克)在 4 岁时接受评估。认知能力采用 Griffiths 精神发育量表进行测量,而神经心理学能力(语言、短期记忆、视觉运动和空间建构能力以及视觉处理能力)则采用标准化测试进行评估。采用多变量回归分析来探讨早产和社会人口因素对认知的影响,并对认知水平和母亲教育进行神经心理学评分调整。

结果

早产儿的 Griffiths 总评分明显低于足月出生的儿童(97.4 分 vs 103.4 分;p<0.001)。与较高 Griffiths 评分相关的因素包括母亲接受过大学教育(β=6.2;95%置信区间 [CI] 0.7-11.7)和有兄弟姐妹或双胞胎(β=4.0;95% CI 0.5-7.6)。在神经心理学评估中,早产儿在除词汇生成(波士顿命名测试)和视觉处理准确性外的所有测试中均显著低于足月对照组儿童。在调整认知水平和母亲教育后,语言流畅性(p<0.05)和理解、短期记忆和空间能力仍存在统计学意义上的差异(p<0.01)。

结论

建议对健康的非常早产儿进行神经心理学随访,以便在入学前发现优势和挑战,并计划干预措施,旨在最大限度地提高学业成功。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验