• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭药品支出与巴西公共卫生系统中免费药品的作用。

Household expenditures for medicines and the role of free medicines in the Brazilian public health system.

机构信息

Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo, Brazil.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2011 May;101(5):916-21. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.175844. Epub 2010 Aug 19.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2009.175844
PMID:20724692
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3076418/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We sought to investigate, across different socioeconomic groups, the proportion of household medicine expenses that were paid by households and the proportion paid by the Brazilian national health system.

METHODS

We carried out a survey in Porto Alegre, Brazil, that included 2988 individuals of all ages. We defined 2 expenditure variables: "out-of-pocket medicines value" (the sum of retail prices of all medicines used by family members within the previous 15 days and paid for out of pocket) and "free medicines value" (a similar definition for medicines obtained without charge).

RESULTS

In 2003, the Brazilian national health system provided, free of charge, 78% of the monetary value of medicines reported (79% in the bottom wealth quintile and 32% in the top 2 quintiles). The mean out-of-pocket expense for medicines was 6 times greater among the top wealth quintiles compared with those in lower quintiles, but free medicines constituted a 3-times-greater proportion of potential expenditures for medicines among the bottom quintile than among the top 2 quintiles.

CONCLUSIONS

Free provision of medicines seems to be saving substantial amounts of medicine expenditures for poor people in Brazil.

摘要

目的

我们旨在调查不同社会经济群体中,家庭支付的药品费用占比和巴西国家卫生系统支付的药品费用占比。

方法

我们在巴西阿雷格里港开展了一项调查,共纳入 2988 名不同年龄段的个体。我们定义了 2 个支出变量:“自付药品价值”(家庭在过去 15 天内使用的所有药品的零售价格总和,需自费支付)和“免费药品价值”(用于无费用获取的药品的类似定义)。

结果

2003 年,巴西国家卫生系统免费提供了所报告药品货币价值的 78%(底层五分之一财富群体为 79%,前两个五分之一财富群体为 32%)。与较低财富五分位数相比,最高财富五分位数的药品自付费用平均高出 6 倍,但在底层五分位数中,免费药品占潜在药品支出的比例比前两个五分位数高 3 倍。

结论

在巴西,免费提供药品似乎为贫困人群节省了大量药品支出。

相似文献

1
Household expenditures for medicines and the role of free medicines in the Brazilian public health system.家庭药品支出与巴西公共卫生系统中免费药品的作用。
Am J Public Health. 2011 May;101(5):916-21. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.175844. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
2
Access to medicines in Brazil based on monetary and non-monetary acquisition data obtained from the 2008/2009 Household Budget Survey.基于2008/2009年家庭预算调查获得的货币和非货币购买数据,分析巴西的药品获取情况。
Rev Saude Publica. 2016 Dec 22;50:79. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050006635.
3
Trends in out-of-pocket health care expenditures in Canada, by household income, 1997 to 2009.加拿大 1997 年至 2009 年按家庭收入划分的自付医疗保健支出趋势。
Health Rep. 2014 Apr;25(4):13-7.
4
Household out-of-pocket medical expenditures and National Health Insurance in Taiwan: income and regional inequality.台湾地区家庭自付医疗支出与全民健康保险:收入与地区不平等
BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 Sep 2;5:60. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-60.
5
Socioeconomic inequalities in expenditures and income committed to the purchase of medicines in Southern Brazil.巴西南部用于购买药品的支出和收入的社会经济不平等。
Rev Saude Publica. 2011 Oct;45(5):897-905. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102011005000054. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
6
Changes in equity in out-of-pocket payments during the period of health care reforms: evidence from Hungary.医疗改革期间自付费用的公平性变化:来自匈牙利的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2012 Jul 24;11:36. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-11-36.
7
Out-of-pocket health expenditure in a population covered by the Family Health Program in Brazil.巴西家庭健康计划覆盖人群的自付医疗费用。
Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;37(4):758-65. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn063. Epub 2008 Apr 13.
8
[Financial protection for health care expenses provided by public and private systems in Chile].[智利公共和私人系统提供的医疗费用财务保护]
Rev Med Chil. 2018 Jun;146(6):737-744. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872018000600737.
9
Can mothers rely on the Brazilian health system for their deliveries? An assessment of use of the public system and out-of-pocket expenditure in the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort Study, Brazil.母亲们能依靠巴西的医疗系统进行分娩吗?对巴西2004年佩洛塔斯出生队列研究中公共系统的使用情况和自付费用的评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Mar 18;8:57. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-57.
10
An analysis of equity in Brazilian health system financing.巴西卫生系统融资中的公平性分析。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jul-Aug;26(4):1017-28. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.4.1017.

引用本文的文献

1
Corporate social responsibility to improve access to medicines: the case of Brazil.企业社会责任促进药品可及性:以巴西为例
Global Health. 2017 Feb 21;13(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0235-7.
2
Catastrophic expenditure on medicines in Brazil.巴西药品的灾难性支出。
Rev Saude Publica. 2016 Dec;50(suppl 2):15s. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050006172.
3
Use of the Brazilian People's Pharmacy Program by older adults.老年人对巴西人民药房计划的使用情况。
Rev Saude Publica. 2016;50:13. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050006180. Epub 2016 May 3.
4
Is the Brazilian pharmaceutical policy ensuring population access to essential medicines?巴西的药品政策是否确保了民众能够获得基本药物?
Global Health. 2012 Mar 21;8:6. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-8-6.

本文引用的文献

1
A descriptive review of the methodologies used in household surveys on medicine utilization.关于家庭药物使用情况调查中所使用方法的描述性综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Oct 31;8:222. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-222.
2
Medicine access and utilization in a population covered by primary health care in Brazil.巴西初级卫生保健覆盖人群的医疗服务可及性与利用情况
Health Policy. 2009 Mar;89(3):295-302. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
3
Out-of-pocket health expenditure in a population covered by the Family Health Program in Brazil.巴西家庭健康计划覆盖人群的自付医疗费用。
Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;37(4):758-65. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn063. Epub 2008 Apr 13.
4
[Out-of-pocket drug expenditures by retirees and pensioners 60 years and older in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil].[巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州贝洛奥里藏特60岁及以上退休人员和领取养老金者的自付药品费用]
Cad Saude Publica. 2007 Jun;23(6):1423-30. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2007000600017.
5
Health care spending growth: how different is the United States from the rest of the OECD?医疗保健支出增长:美国与经合组织其他国家有何不同?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jan-Feb;26(1):154-61. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.1.154.
6
[Prevalence and determinants of medicines consumption in Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil].[巴西塞阿拉州福塔莱萨市药品消费的患病率及影响因素]
Cad Saude Publica. 2005 Nov-Dec;21(6):1737-46. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2005000600021. Epub 2006 Jan 9.
7
[A nationwide wealth score based on the 2000 Brazilian demographic census].[基于2000年巴西人口普查的全国财富得分]
Rev Saude Publica. 2005 Aug;39(4):523-9. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102005000400002. Epub 2005 Aug 16.
8
[Drug utilization in adults: prevalence and individuals determinants].[成人药物使用情况:患病率及个体决定因素]
Rev Saude Publica. 2004 Apr;38(2):228-38. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102004000200012. Epub 2004 Apr 26.