• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于家庭药物使用情况调查中所使用方法的描述性综述。

A descriptive review of the methodologies used in household surveys on medicine utilization.

作者信息

Bertoldi Andréa D, Barros Aluísio J D, Wagner Anita, Ross-Degnan Dennis, Hallal Pedro C

机构信息

Programa de pós-graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, Brazil.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Oct 31;8:222. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-222.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-8-222
PMID:18976465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2584639/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies carried out in the community enable researchers to understand access to medicines, affordability, and barriers to use from the consumer's point of view, and may stimulate the development of adequate medicines policies. The aim of the present article was to describe methodological and analytical aspects of quantitative studies on medicine utilization carried out at the household level.

METHODS

Systematic review of original papers with data collected in studies in which the household was a sampling unit, published between 1995 and 2008. The electronic review was carried out in Medline/Pubmed, Scielo and Lilacs. The reference lists of the papers identified were examined, as well as other publications by their authors. Studies on the utilization of specific pharmacological groups, or those including only respondents with a given disease were excluded.

RESULTS

Out of 4852 papers initially identified in the literature search, 61 fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Most studies were carried out in Europe and North America and used a cross-sectional approach. More than 80% used face-to-face interviews for data collection, and the most frequently used recall period for assessing medicine utilization was 14-15 days. In 59% of the studies, interviewers were trained to request the packaging of the medicines reported by the subjects; medical prescriptions were requested less frequently (15% of the studies).

CONCLUSION

These data will be useful for updating researchers on what methods their peers are currently using. Such information may help overcome challenges in the planning and analyses of future studies. Moreover, this publication may contribute to the improvement of the quality of medicine use data obtained in household surveys.

摘要

背景

在社区开展的研究能让研究者从消费者角度了解药品的可及性、可负担性及使用障碍,还可能推动制定适当的药品政策。本文旨在描述在家庭层面开展的药品使用定量研究的方法学和分析方面。

方法

对1995年至2008年期间发表的、以家庭为抽样单位收集数据的原始论文进行系统综述。通过Medline/Pubmed、Scielo和Lilacs进行电子检索。检查所识别论文的参考文献列表以及作者的其他出版物。排除关于特定药理组使用情况的研究,或仅纳入患有特定疾病受访者的研究。

结果

在文献检索最初识别出的4852篇论文中,61篇符合我们的纳入标准。大多数研究在欧洲和北美开展,采用横断面研究方法。超过80%的研究使用面对面访谈收集数据,评估药品使用最常用的回忆期为14 - 15天。在59%的研究中,访谈者接受培训以要求受试者提供所报告药品的包装;要求提供医疗处方的情况较少(15%的研究)。

结论

这些数据将有助于让研究者了解同行目前正在使用的方法。此类信息可能有助于克服未来研究规划和分析中的挑战。此外,本出版物可能有助于提高家庭调查中获得的药品使用数据的质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/379f/2584639/47a17470c943/1472-6963-8-222-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/379f/2584639/47a17470c943/1472-6963-8-222-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/379f/2584639/47a17470c943/1472-6963-8-222-1.jpg

相似文献

1
A descriptive review of the methodologies used in household surveys on medicine utilization.关于家庭药物使用情况调查中所使用方法的描述性综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Oct 31;8:222. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-222.
2
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
3
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
6
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
9
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
10
Efficacy of nicergoline in dementia and other age associated forms of cognitive impairment.尼麦角林治疗痴呆及其他与年龄相关的认知障碍形式的疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;2001(4):CD003159. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003159.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-medication among pregnant women in comparison to the general population: a scoping review of the main characteristics.与普通人群相比,孕妇的自我药疗:主要特征的范围综述
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024 Dec 4;46. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo77. eCollection 2024.
2
Inappropriate antibiotic access practices at the community level in Eastern Ethiopia.在埃塞俄比亚东部的社区层面存在不合理的抗生素获取做法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 1;14(1):17751. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67688-1.
3
[Contextual characteristics and demand for health services among Brazilian adolescents: Brazilian National Health Survey, 2019].

本文引用的文献

1
The Po River Delta epidemiological study: use of medicines in a general population sample of north Italy.波河流域三角洲地区流行病学研究:意大利北部一般人群用药情况。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2000 Jul;9(4):319-26. doi: 10.1002/1099-1557(200007/08)9:4<319::AID-PDS505>3.0.CO;2-6.
2
Medicine access and utilization in a population covered by primary health care in Brazil.巴西初级卫生保健覆盖人群的医疗服务可及性与利用情况
Health Policy. 2009 Mar;89(3):295-302. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
3
Medication use and gender in Massachusetts: results of a household survey.
[巴西青少年的背景特征与卫生服务需求:2019年巴西国家卫生调查]
Cad Saude Publica. 2023 Dec 11;39(12):e00070223. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPT070223. eCollection 2023.
4
A New Tool for an Awareness Plan Concerning Critical Issues, Needs and Attitudes of Citizens on the Use of Medicines.一个关于公民在药品使用方面的关键问题、需求和态度的宣传计划的新工具。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Oct 20;9(11):1409. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111409.
5
Intra-Individual Variability in Self-Reported Use of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Medicines Depending on Mode of Data Collection - Observations from the Population Study of Women in Gothenburg, Sweden.根据数据收集方式,自我报告的非甾体抗炎药和镇痛药使用情况的个体内变异性——来自瑞典哥德堡女性人群研究的观察结果
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Jul 8;14:3243-3250. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S314348. eCollection 2021.
6
Medicine storage, wastage, and associated determinants among urban households: a systematic review and meta-analysis of household surveys.城市家庭中的药品储存、浪费及相关影响因素:一项关于家庭调查的系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 12;21(1):1127. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11100-4.
7
Impact of birthweight on health-care utilization during early childhood - a birth cohort study.出生体重对儿童早期医疗保健利用的影响——一项出生队列研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Mar 1;19(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1424-8.
8
National Survey on Access, Use and Promotion of Rational Use of Medicines (PNAUM): household survey component methods.全国药品合理使用的获取、使用及推广情况调查(PNAUM):家庭调查部分方法
Rev Saude Publica. 2016 Dec;50(suppl 2):4s. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050006156.
9
Sociodemographic profile of medicines users in Brazil: results from the 2014 PNAUM survey.巴西药品使用者的社会人口学概况:2014年全国药物使用情况调查结果
Rev Saude Publica. 2016 Dec;50(suppl 2):5s. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050006119.
10
Access to continued-use medication among older adults, Brazil.巴西老年人获取持续使用药物的情况。
Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49:14. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2015049005352. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
马萨诸塞州的药物使用与性别:一项家庭调查的结果
Health Care Women Int. 2007 Aug;28(7):593-613. doi: 10.1080/07399330701334646.
4
Predictive factors of self-medicated drug use among the Spanish adult population.西班牙成年人口中自我用药的预测因素。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Feb;17(2):193-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.1455.
5
Medication administered to children from 0 to 7.5 years in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC).在阿冯父母与儿童纵向研究(ALSPAC)中,对0至7.5岁儿童施用的药物。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Feb;63(2):189-95. doi: 10.1007/s00228-006-0231-y. Epub 2007 Jan 3.
6
[A population-based study on use of medication by the elderly in Greater Metropolitan Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil].[巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州贝洛奥里藏特大都市区老年人用药情况的基于人群的研究]
Cad Saude Publica. 2006 Dec;22(12):2657-67. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2006001200015.
7
Self-reported drug utilization, health, and lifestyle factors among 70-74 year old community dwelling individuals in Western Norway. The Hordaland Health Study (HUSK).挪威西部70 - 74岁社区居住个体的自我报告药物使用、健康及生活方式因素。霍达兰健康研究(HUSK)。
BMC Public Health. 2006 May 3;6:121. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-121.
8
Self-medication practices in Khartoum State, Sudan.苏丹喀土穆州的自我药疗行为。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Apr;62(4):317-24. doi: 10.1007/s00228-006-0107-1. Epub 2006 Mar 7.
9
[Use of medications by elderly Brazilian retirees: 1--methodology and response rates of a multicenter survey].[巴西老年退休人员的药物使用情况:1. 多中心调查的方法和应答率]
Cad Saude Publica. 2006 Jan;22(1):87-96. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2006000100010. Epub 2006 Feb 6.
10
Utilization of medicines by the Brazilian population, 2003.2003年巴西民众的药品使用情况
Cad Saude Publica. 2005;21 Suppl:100-8. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2005000700011. Epub 2006 Jan 31.