Department of Civil Engineering, National University of Singapore, 117576 Singapore, Singapore.
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1866-77. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.007. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
Work zones especially long-term work zones increase traffic conflicts and cause safety problems. Proper casualty risk assessment for a work zone is of importance for both traffic safety engineers and travelers. This paper develops a novel probabilistic quantitative risk assessment (QRA) model to evaluate the casualty risk combining frequency and consequence of all accident scenarios triggered by long-term work zone crashes. The casualty risk is measured by the individual risk and societal risk. The individual risk can be interpreted as the frequency of a driver/passenger being killed or injured, and the societal risk describes the relation between frequency and the number of casualties. The proposed probabilistic QRA model consists of the estimation of work zone crash frequency, an event tree and consequence estimation models. There are seven intermediate events--age (A), crash unit (CU), vehicle type (VT), alcohol (AL), light condition (LC), crash type (CT) and severity (S)--in the event tree. Since the estimated value of probability for some intermediate event may have large uncertainty, the uncertainty can thus be characterized by a random variable. The consequence estimation model takes into account the combination effects of speed and emergency medical service response time (ERT) on the consequence of work zone crash. Finally, a numerical example based on the Southeast Michigan work zone crash data is carried out. The numerical results show that there will be a 62% decrease of individual fatality risk and 44% reduction of individual injury risk if the mean travel speed is slowed down by 20%. In addition, there will be a 5% reduction of individual fatality risk and 0.05% reduction of individual injury risk if ERT is reduced by 20%. In other words, slowing down speed is more effective than reducing ERT in the casualty risk mitigation.
工作区,尤其是长期工作区,会增加交通冲突并导致安全问题。对工作区进行适当的伤亡风险评估,对交通安全工程师和出行者都很重要。本文开发了一种新的概率定量风险评估(QRA)模型,用于评估由长期工作区事故引发的所有事故场景的频率和后果,从而对伤亡风险进行评估。伤亡风险由个体风险和社会风险来衡量。个体风险可以解释为驾驶员/乘客死亡或受伤的频率,而社会风险描述了频率与伤亡人数之间的关系。所提出的概率 QRA 模型由工作区碰撞频率的估计、事件树和后果估计模型组成。事件树中有七个中间事件——年龄(A)、碰撞单元(CU)、车辆类型(VT)、酒精(AL)、照明条件(LC)、碰撞类型(CT)和严重程度(S)。由于某些中间事件的概率估计值可能存在较大的不确定性,因此可以用随机变量来描述这种不确定性。后果估计模型考虑了速度和紧急医疗服务响应时间(ERT)对工作区碰撞后果的综合影响。最后,基于密歇根东南部工作区碰撞数据进行了数值示例分析。数值结果表明,如果将平均行驶速度降低 20%,个体死亡风险将降低 62%,个体受伤风险将降低 44%。此外,如果 ERT 降低 20%,个体死亡风险将降低 5%,个体受伤风险将降低 0.05%。换句话说,在减少伤亡风险方面,降低速度比降低 ERT 更有效。